((Ah, B*******. However, I still don't understand why a party is forced into a coalition if only one part of the potential coalition is in favour.))
((Ah, B*******. However, I don't understand why a party is forced into a coalition if only one part of the potential coalition is in favour.))
The only real proponents of socialism? Excuse me good Sir, but that does not sound like a rational statement. The FNT has and always will stand for Socialism. Just because we refuse to use senseless violence to achieve our goals like you do does not mean that we are not proponents of Socialism.
- Sérgio Gogołów
"Comrade Acevedo, our struggle does not end with Socialism. It ends with true Communism. Renaming ourselves the Socialist Party merely gives the image that this is all we want. Socialism. I do not support such a changing of the Party's name."
-Comrade Armando Renin
The FNT is obviously a bourgeois party. We are a workers' party.
You're not the party, Dyranum. By my count, both parties were in favor of a coalition, and I just recounted to confirm that. Unless there was some odd vote swapping that I missed (and I saw yours), then you can blame Viola and Welshdude for your current circumstance, as they both voted in favor of coalitions.
((Yeah, but AFAIK there were 2 votes for a coalition with the Commies, one abstainee and two in favour for a coalition with the Liberals. That doesn't make the FNT in favour of a coalition with the Commies. It makes it hopelessly divided on that point.))
No, it doesn't because WelshDude voted for both Liberal and Comunista coalition, so both had two votes OUT OF THREE VOTES CAST. That's a majority for both.
And you're the kind of man who would enslave the workers, "for their own good" and "so as not to loose votes from the centre". But, for the moment we are partners so I apologize for hurting your pride. I thought it a was a truism.