this isn't "Papal Election Kings 2" or "College of Cardinals 2." It's "Crusader Kings 2."
That's true.
But, maybe I can't forget that the Pope who calls for Crusade...
o
The last game I made, popes were often ridiculous teenagers: these "elections" seem to forget the Gregorian Reform period.
The papal system need not be logical or accurate.
It's
your point of view.
Please, note I didn't say that I think the election mechanism
need to be "historical", but only "logical".
It's not the case at this time.
it's abstracted in the game, because the game's major theme lies in other directions.
Yes, I know. You think that the game is
only about
dynasties.
And you are right...
But with the previous version of the game, I have often tried to put a character from my
dynasty on the Holy See.
So, it isn't clearly
off topic.
papal elections lie outside the scope of this game, that is my argument
And
my argument is that, conversely, the role of the Pope is essential in a game focused on the history of the Crusades.
(More than knowing, as we read regularly, if you can play with a pagan or republican family).
I'm not asking for
substantial changes, but at least the return of a more logical system, as we could found in the first version of the game.
I can understand that this issue doesn't concern your opinion about this (moreover, always interesting) game, but I don't see how you can think that it's almost irrelevant... :sad:
Of course, that doesn't make me stop playing the game, but this issue seems more important to me that other minor problems, because it's hard coded and can not be resolved by any mod (as I know).