• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Message to Adm. Gensui Yamamoto:

Your strategy, while not without merit from a purely militaristic point of view, will allow the enemy to take our soil. This is unacceptable and unhonorable. Also, in the current situation I do not see how we could possibly enrage the worlds public opinion if we would enact war economy while being at war and with the growing threat of Soviet agressiveness right at our doorstep. We have to do this simply to prepare ourselves for eventualities.

Not if we take their soil!

If we start a mobilisation for a war economy, then we must prolong this war in China, not shorten it, if we take General Surts idea of marching into Siking (and posssibly Tibet), then we can extend the war until our preperations to deal with the Soviets are met.

If instead we do not take this warmongering stance, then in the soon to be peace, we shall have massive popular disent back home. Let me stress this will not only create war weariness, but also a need to placate the populace since the economic implementations will be highly unpopular dispite the support our party holds.



This is what this decision means. It is not a bonus only, it comes with other issues. I myself would advocate the first stance, if this administration does not proscicute it, then I must accept the latter stance with General Surt and extend this Chinese conflict. We shall therefore increase our threat but more than what we would should we have waited.

We must recognise that war weariness will kick in, this will eventually sap the publics will to prosicute war in a year and a bit or so, at which point we will have much more difficultiy in justifying our possition, then we will need to revert to less mobilised economic state (if we can), or begin to loosing the backing of industrialists and financiers for equipment and armaments (IC). This will be at a time when such a state may be entirly what we need.
 
I fully expected that the war could be prolonged by various means, to a point where we are ready to take the fight to the Soviets or the western Allies. We have so much to produce to be ready for either of these wars, we dearly need the additional capacities that law provides.
 
*Actually, the war itself doesn't do much. The laws do, but we are currently at Full Mobilisation, which is fully possible to keep even during peacetime. CGs are not a problem, thanks to our government type and various modifiers. War Economy would result in loss of popularity during peacetime, but popularity of the fascists is very high, so this is not a concern ATM. War exhaustion is a non-issue thanks to our victories, but it will probably change over time and War Economy increases its accumulation. Battles which ended with very high casualties on our side also increase war exhaustion. During peacetime, there is no war exhaustion, only popularity loss.
 
*out of char
I find it gamy to prolong any war, we either fight to defeat the enemies we have or we DoW someone else before any surrender and then prosecute that war with all energy.
 
*out of char
I find it gamy to prolong any war, we either fight to defeat the enemies we have or we DoW someone else before any surrender and then prosecute that war with all energy.
*I agree, so it will not be allowed as a long-term measure. I don't have a problem with it as a short-term measure, though. Besides, AI-controlled armies cannot really be told to "prolong the war".
 
Influence Levels

1. Industrial Capacity:

IJA - 60%

IJN - 40%


2. Leadership

IJA - 50%

IJN - 50%


3. Manpower

IJA - 70%

IJN - 30%



No changes, because the previous budget was sufficient to carry out most of requested orders. Our total IC was increased and generally less IC was needed for upgrades and reinforcements and many of our infrastructure development programs were finished, so more IC could be used for production. However, our troops and aircraft eat supplies at a astonishing rate, which means that our supply stock dwindled. I've been gradually increasing supply production in order to avoid rapid shifts in focus, but it will still be needed now, I guess. Of course, I monitor the supply situation in China closely in order to avoid the collapse of the supply network.

I like the fact that we started building units again. I feel safer that way, because we will have more reserves.

No, China is not beaten. Most of your predictions in that regard were overly optimistic. The funny thing is that RL Japanese also believed that they won the war when they scored several major victories, but the reality was different.

General Influence Levels - IJA 60% / IJN 40%

*Note that the General Influence Level doesn't mean much by itself. It's just there to show the average influence levels of both factions.
 
Chapter Four, Part One: Sino-Japanese War / Japanese-American War
Dec 1940 - May 1941

Previously in the Influence Wars...

The Japanese armies managed to form a big pocket near Wuhan and destroyed all trapped Chinese divisions. However, the Chinese made a major counter-attack in northern and southern China.

In Europe, the Soviet Union declared war on the German Reich and Germany was trapped in a two-front war. Despite this, they made big gains in Western Europe, while war in East looked like a stalemate. In North Africa, however, the Axis was clearly losing.

And now, the conclusion...


Politics


The beginning of the Japanese-American War





The beginning of the Japanese-American conflict was unequivocally the most important event of the several last months, if not the several last years. Therefore, it is very important to describe it in detail.

On 11th of January, the United States of America officially started mobilisation. We believe that unofficially it had been ongoing for months on smaller scale and the US government was simply trying to find or create the right excuse for official mobilisation. It is well known that President Roosevelt and his administration support interventionist foreign policy, but the bulk of the American public opinion does not want war. This isolationism served as a shield against US intervention in China, but even the strongest shields can be broken.

The US mobilisation was troubling for the Japanese leadership and many claimed that it was the failure of the foreign policy pursued by various cabinets formed in 1939-1940. The new situation required a strong leader and Konoe Fumimaro was no longer viewed as the right candidate. Therefore, on 22th of January General Hideki Tojo was appointed as the new Prime Minister of Japan. General Tojo is a patriot, the Emperor's loyalist and a firm supporter of an alliance with Germany and Italy.

General Tojo believed that war with the West was inevitable and the only thing that could be done was to delay the beginning of the conflict with the West as long as possible and finish the war in China as soon as possible, so that the Japanese forces would gain more time to prepare for the upcoming conflict. General Tojo agreed with some of the senior members of the Army and the Navy who claimed that the Japanese industry should not be mobilised further in order not to cause the American and British reaction. Also, despite his strong support for Germany, he believed that joining the Axis would mean the war with the Soviet Union, something that the Empire could not afford.

Unfortunately, despite the best efforts to preserve peace as long as possible, the US warmongers still attacked us sooner than expected. On 17th of May, President Roosevelt asked the Congress to authorise the beginning of hostilities against Japan. Despite the protests of the opposition, the authorisation was granted. In a demagogic speech full of blatant lies, the President accused Japan of "warmongering", "causing destabilisation in Asia and the Pacific" and "making intensive preparations for a strike on the US soil". He managed to convince many Americans that a strike against Japan is a pre-emptive war.

In the light of this event, the Imperial Administration feels obliged to clearly and openly state its full support for the actions of the Emperor and General Tojo and for the Holy War against China and the United States of America. The Administration will perform its duties even more diligently.

Europe and the Middle East





On 30th of December 1940, the French signed the armistice with the Germans and a pro-German French State was created in parts of southern France and North Africa. This was a major victory for the Germans, as it allowed them to focus on the Soviet Union and Scandinavia.

The German government has been searching for a way to distract the Allies for quite some time and when the opportunity presented itself in the Middle East, they took it immediately. Anti-British sentiment in Iraq was strong and Iraq joined the Axis still in 1940. Given the situation in North Africa, they obviously had no chance to survive very long, but the Germans had what they wanted - a distraction that could last several months (Iraq was conquered by the Allies in March).

Eastern Asia





On January 1940, the alliance between the Chinese communists and nationalists came to an end. This came as a surprise to the Japanese government, as it was expected that the Chinese would manage to stay more or less united during war with Japan. The theory is that recent Chinese defeats caused internal disorder among their ranks. Naturally, everything that weakens the Chinese is beneficial to the Empire.

However, since most of the Chinese warlords supported the nationalists, Kuomintang was able to strengthen its rule. The nationalists gained full control over Yunnan and they managed to persuade Xinjiang to join the war against Japan.


War in China





In the second half of December, the Japanese soldiers not only managed to stop the Chinese counter-attack in the North, but also to start a powerful offensive on their own. At least three Chinese divisions were encircled and the Chinese were being pushed back along the whole front.






In the last day of January, the Japanese troops took Changde. The Third Battle of Changde was not as bloody as the first and second ones and the casualty ratio was very favourable for us.

The disorganisation caused by the continuation of the Chinese Civil War hastened the collapse of the Chinese defence lines in northern China and by February all territory lost in the latest Chinese counter-attacked was reconquered and the Japanese troops started new conquests. The primary goals were the conquest of Chongqing and various northern Chinese cities and the encirclement of the communist mountain strongholds. Unfortunately, the terrain became even harsher than before and combined with the Chinese numbers, the mountains and the jungles were very hard obstacles to overcome. As a result, most battles in the region were very bloody.





In the South, Bose changed hands several times. The city was named the Baofeng of the South by the soldiers and for good reasons - whoever managed to gain control over it did not remain in control for a long time. However, considering that Baofeng was eventually conquered and secured by the Japanese troops, we believe that one day Bose will meet the same fate. As of 17th of May, we control the city.

Combined Japanese-Chinese southern offensives in Chongqing and Guiyang failed and several thousand Japanese and pro-Japanese Chinese men lost their lives in the process. The masses of enemies protecting those provinces were simply overwhelming.


Economy, war readiness and other matters






Two new warships - a light carrier and a light cruiser - were finished in March. The shipyards immediately started the production of two modern light cruisers, which will surely be needed in the war against the USA. Additionally, a new fighter wing and several infantry and garrison divisions were formed.

Various infrastructure development programs in China were finished and although the general program is not completed yet, the state of infrastructure in China is already much better than it was before and we managed to expand the Hirohito Line considerably.

Tons of new equipment are being produced in order to equip many new infantry divisions and new fighter wings. Our supply production had to be increased in order to meet the greater demand, but we expect that the current efforts are not enough and it will have to be increased even further.

List of researched technologies:

Light Cruiser AA, Education, Fire Control System Training, Single Engine Airframe, ASW Tactics, Fighter Ground Crew Training, Commander Decision Making, Central Decision Making, Central Fighter Command Structure, Armoured Car Armour, Radar Training, AT Ammunition and Muzzle Velocity, CAs Ground Crew Training, Light AA Armament, Combat Medicine, Security Training, Electronic Computing Machine.

Currently our engineers and planners are working on the development of tank destroyers and mechanised infantry formations and we should be ready to start production of necessary equipment in May and June, respectively.






Generally, it was expected that hostilities between Japan and the USA would not be started before 1942, so the Japanese military is not as ready for the war with the USA as we would like it to be. Most of our divisions and all of our airforce are still engaged in China and two available CTFs are supporting the operations in southern and northern China. However, our SAGs are currently docked at ports and waiting for orders. Whether the current composition of our fleets is optimal or not is unclear - their performance was good against the token Chinese Navy, but the American Navy is a much more formidable enemy.

It should be noted that in some cases there are massive differences between the capabilities of our most modern ships and their older equivalents, e.g. the difference between the available firepower of the IJN Yamato and the old battlecruiser IJN Kirishima are immense. Also, not all of our ships have been equipped with modern AA guns and scout planes yet and we definitely lack modern escort ships.


Overviews








*Note the Allied offensive in Denmark

---------------

Meeting of the Imperial General Headquarters
*IGH have been recently reactivated, as the High Command was deemed insufficient for the purposes of the war with the USA

*Before you arrive at the meeting, you are approached by strange men who are most likely Kempeitai officers working undercover in civilian clothes. They make it clear to you that you are expected to "willingly" state your full approval of the war with the USA and full support for the Axis armies fighting in Europe. Apparently, your previous lacklustre support for the fascists and reluctance to the prospect of joining the Axis gained some unwanted attention.

Emperor's Speech

Honoured Members of the Imperial Japanese Military,

We meet today in this building which started to resemble a giant bunker in order to face our fears openly and honourably. We already know the facts, now we need to address them.

The task at hand may seem daunting, but if we succumb to fear and cowardice, the Nation will surely be ruined. If we are to win this war and prosper, in the following days, weeks, months and probably even years, each Japanese General and Admiral, every member of the Japanese society will have to use all of their abilities to the uttermost.

While it is a clear failure of our policies that we did not choose the moment for the outbreak of hostilities, it is My will that we do not delve too deeply into fighting with the past and instead look straight into the eyes of the future. The Nation needs to stay united in the face of a crisis.

General Hideki Tojo will serve as my right-hand in the meetings of the Imperial General Headquarters and whenever I am not present, his words are to be treated as my own.

I expect nothing less than total loyalty from each and every one of you, as the Empire shall need every ounce of it in order to assume its rightful place under the Sun.

Hideki Tojo's Speech

Blessed be the Emperor and the Empire He rules!

It goes without saying that when survival is threatened, struggles erupt between peoples, and unfortunate wars between nations result. The United States of America clearly does not want to accept the position Japan is destined to take in Asia. As every imperialist nation, they do not want to share - they only want to control. They are the threat to the very survival of our Nation.

As the reserves we currently have at our disposal are clearly not sufficient to conduct a full-scale war against the Americans, our resources will need to be split between the Pacific Theatre and the Chinese Theatre. I believe that China should still be our first priority and we should dedicate our efforts to end the war in China as soon as possible. Therefore, it is our foremost duty to protect the shipping lines to Korea and China, vital to the war effort.

I think that recent events convinced everyone that we should immediately mobilise our economy for war. Our military efforts take priority before anything else.

Chongqing is currently the most important Chinese city and we should try to take it as soon as possible. In the Pacific, the Philippines is the most obvious and the most immediate threat. As long as the Americans control the Philippines, our shipping lines to China cannot be safe. In fact, Japan itself cannot be safe, as the American long-range bombers may be able to reach our homeland from their bases in the Philippines - something that we simply cannot tolerate.

Under no conditions the troops currently stationed in Manchuria are to be moved to other theatres. We need to guard ourselves against every eventuality, including the Soviet aggression. If the communists strike in Manchuria and we are not able to defend it, our entire effort in China will be wasted.

We also need to accept the fact that sooner or later, the British may support the Americans. Therefore, contingency plans have to be created for the potential war with the British Empire.
 
To make a long story short:
- Get all ships forming into sensible fleets and go out hunting for US fleets. This means that the most modern ships should be grouped together. There shouldn't be pure CTF / SAG fleets, the elements will need to support each other.
- Keep our fleets together so they can support each other, rotate damaged ships back to port, replace them with ships from the reserve if neccessary.
- Once the marine corps can be taken out of the Chinese front, we can use them to take over the American Islands in the Pacific. These should be taken to deny the enemy forward bases, we will not have the spare manpower to garrison them as well.
- Once the enemy starts to hunt for our convoys, me must take all available steps to find and destroy these subs.


To administrative clerk:
Are we at war with the Philippines as well?
Did we finally switch over to war economy?
 
Are we at war with the Philippines as well?
Did we finally switch over to war economy?
1. Yes, we are.
2. It was mentioned in the report and in General Tojo's speech that this is not the case. Obviously, it should be done now.

Once the marine corps can be taken out of the Chinese front, we can use them to take over the American Islands in the Pacific
Naval infantry is already stationed on Taiwan - check the "Overviews" section.
 
I'd still recommend to invade all US islands between Japan and Hawaii. Hawaii does not need to be taken yet. The marines will ship out of these islands instantly and then turn their attention on the Philippines.

Message to army HQ: We'll need troops to garrison the Philippines.
 
Fleets should be mixed.

Combat fleets should consist of several BBs with an Carrier for air cover and 5-6 light cruisers.
Support fleets consist of BCs with heavy cruisers if they don't slow the BCs down. If they do, they should be replaced by CLs.
ASW fleets should of course consist of ships which are good at sub hunting. 2-3 DDs with a light cruiser should do fine.

Fleets should be assembled so they have maximium effect. This will result in the most advanced ships being deployed in the same fleets while more outdated ships will be relegated to fleets with similarily outdated ships.

The fleets will need to operate in each others vincinity to allow us mutual fire support.

The reasoning behind the invasion of the US islands close to us is to:
a) annihalate a small portion of their forces
b) lure their fleet out into a battlefield of our choosing
c) temporarily reduce the submarine threat to our merchant shipping
d) throw back their own plans regarding China
 
The US navy is quite big, hence the idea to concentrate on parts of it one at a time. We need to hit them with overwhelming power and come out with as few losses as possible because they can produce so many more ships than we can. Also, while the area of operation is currently quite vast, our fleets can sail rather quickly, especially on our side of the Pacific.

If we can manage to create 3x Combat fleets, 2x Support fleets, 2x ASW fleets, that'd be the minimum we need to cover our operations and our merchants. We should also divert our forces from landing operations to oppose hostile movements when the opportunity is there. We can re-conquer islands, but if we can sink enemy ships without losing some of our own, that'll be too good a chance to pass by.
 
Your assumption about the size of the USN is most likely correct, but the Administration wants to point out that as long as the USA has access to even one base in the Pacific, some of our supply lines will be threatened by US submarines. If the British support the Americans, then the situation will be even worse.

The Administration also believes that it is very important to develop a method of escorting damaged ships back to port safely. If we use whole fleets for this purpose, then they will not be able to take part in the action for some time.
 
Generals, Admirals, our Gracious Emperor,

Before we embroil ourselves too far we need an exit strategy. Since the Americans have declared war on us, they obviously have the will to prosecute this war, unlike the Chinese. The American declaration of war is a mixed blessing because we now have a just cause to inspire the masses and mobilise a full war economy. Thus settling earlier issues of mobilising the nation in a soon-to-be peace.

Our exit strategy should be simple; if they want to fight Japan, they shall have to kill every single last one of us before we surrender. Yet at the same time we propose that once we have claimed all their imperial colonial assets as reparation for this unprovoked aggression, we shall offer terms of negotiation for armistice.

Obviously this means that any plans for avenging ourselves against the vile soviets will need to be put on hold indefinitely as propping up our south-china, central china and Himalayain regions against the British and French empires will become necessity after the fall of China. Similarly a bulk of our armed forces shall need to be moved into central Manchuria in order to react to a soviet stab of attack with them being in cahoots with the evil Americans.

Overall; the cost of subduing the Asian Peoples to the colonials or soviets needs to cost far more than these powers can or will be willing to pay.

It is our manifest destiny that the Emperor and Japanese people will unite all of Asia under the flag of the rising sun. To that end, the Philippines should be considered an extension of the Japanese Empire as well, other groups such as the Xinjiang Turkic groups and Hui Chinese however can be considered as a Japanese supported puppet*. This should help in our post-war image and do much to help reconcile a future peace.


With this exit strategy, a full war economy, and a defensive stance vis-a-vis the Bolsheviks our main target outside of securing and rebuilding China will be solely focused on the American Threat.


This Admiral proposes that we take action with a sense of caution. Fleets should only seek to engage on favourable defensive terms against American fleets. Where we don't have radar to detect American naval assets we could do with flying some of our figheter-bombers to keep an active scout on our maritime sphere.

The garrisons for the Home Islands and Pacific Islands should be put on top priority. If the administrations clerk could pull up the relevant maps with our current deployments on these islands I would be most grateful.

Our second priority needs to be economic total war. It will not be 'good enough' to build just a few escort ships more. In line with previous thinking, Japan needs to mass produce the weapons of war. We should seek to production line light cruisers at a rate of manufacture that will mean even as we take losses our entire navy will still grow. While we might not have the capitals for mass produced fleets as of yet, within a year we could be undertaking such thoughts. As part of our exit strategy we need to make the Americans believe they have woken the slumbering Asian Economic juggernaut.

Third priority is to win air command of the pacific. If our planes control the skies, our ships can deploy as they like. Any and all NAV bombers need to be set to raid American naval ports. It is this Admiral suggestion that we could strongly do with a Naval Patrol Bomber focus in air build priorities in the near future.

Our first targets should be Guam, Wake and the Philippine naval bases, spot for fleets present and then conduct port strikes, prioritising the repair of this naval wing within the airforce. Meanwhile researching naval attack ordinance to modern levels.

With the fall of the ROC we should immediately switch our CAG focus to naval roll, but for the meantime most CAGs should focus on the land war. Only recall enough CAGs to populate one of our most modern carrier groups full time**. The worst thing we can do is to create a knee jerk reaction to the Americans and thus loose the focus in China. One target at a time.

South Priority needs to be conducted swiftly, a show of direct force. The Philippines needs to be taken. Pending Admiral Baltersars approval and a full account of the current strength of our Marine Corps (I can't appear to see their unit icons for their numbers/location).

I suggest three landings, a diversion on the east coast of a single division that we should be able to air supply from Palau***, then two main attacks from the Northern ports initially spearheaded by Marine corps, but shipping in 6-8 divisions of infantry and art to take the highlands and Clark field. As much air cover needs to be given to this attack as can be until it is clearly in the ascendant.

At least two marine divisions will then begin the island hopping to clear out and claim other parts of the Philippines if need be.

Pending the collapse of the American puppet regime we shall annex the Philippines and consider the fortification of its ports and major straits crossings (marked orange).

map.png



At this point in time we can consider prosecuting attacks on Guam and Wake, then Marcus, then a major strike against the Hawaiian islands.


Strategically Thinking:
We do not have a strong source of oil now that America has cut us off. Our plans to attack the Soviets are now on hold, and the Colonial Powers hold the other reserves in the region. We are at a fundamental disadvantage to declare war on either of those parties. Therefore it is imperative that we bring our Oil refining, Coal to Oil, and Coal production techniques up to state-of-the art present day standards.

Given that the pacific war will be one of high technology over numbers of men, it may be very prudent to look at pursuing a line of theoretical technologies that may lead to war winning weapons; For either of these we shall either need to develop specialist labs, reviewing some scientific literature scientists in Osaka are looking for backing on cyclotron construction, and we do not have any rocket test sites like many of the major powers.

This admiral would like to hear thoughts on if we should pursue technological concepts of the future?


With regards to what we should make our current naval stance, I believe we should employ a universal defensive stance to insure that our fleets are not squandered in patrols without us being in place for decisive engagement.


With regards to joining the axis alliance. I am still strongly against us joining a war with the Colonial Powers with America taking up our concerns, we should not over extend ourselves. After all we cannot take on almost the entire world and emerge victorious....

Fleet Operations
I shall release a single fleet** for current patrol, and support of the mission to take the Philippines$. The rest of the carrier fleet shall remain at port for saving oil consumption, unless the Americans come within sight of the home islands, Chinese Coast or begin attacks of their own against our pacific assets. To that end the other carrier assets shall be configured;

4th Fleet
IJN Soryu
IJN Ryujo
4x CL Escort

Reserve Fleet
IJN Hosho
IJN Zuiho
+ at least 3xCL Escort

The 4th fleet shall be used in this support role for engagements where additional force is needed, and the reserve at this time shall act in reserve as well as an escort fleet for other damaged vessels to bring them back to port.


* Rather than annex Xinjiang or Xibei we should instead allow them to keep a level of sovereignty, but under our auspice. Thus allowing them to supply themselves, utilise home industry more effectively etc. We might also wish to consider producing some home grown garrison or militia divisions to 'export' to these puppet states on their fall, since our equipment will be off better quality then they can produce themselves. Hence our puppets will be better 'defensive buffers' at the edge of our sphere of influence.

** 3rd Fleet - 2CV 4CL (IJN Kaga, IJN Akagi, and the 4 newest, best equip light cruiser escorts).

*** This is just to confuse the defenders and is not to attempt to advance inland until other divisions are nearby.

$ Note: That CAGs in use in Philippine operations should operate in both CAG duty rolls and support of our ground troops in direct battles.
 
Last edited:
The garrisons for the Home Islands and Pacific Islands should be put on top priority. If the administrations clerk could pull up the relevant maps with our current deployments on these islands I would be most grateful.
Practically every island with a port is currently garrisoned, some more heavily than the others. This is the result of an old defensive strategy developed by the IJA and the IJN several years ago. All ports in Japan are garrisoned, but most of these formations lack heavy artillery, as it was transferred to China.

Third priority is to win air command of the pacific. If our planes control the skies, our ships can deploy as they like. Any and all NAV bombers need to be set to raid American naval ports. It is this Admiral suggestion that we could strongly do with a Naval Patrol Bomber focus in air build priorities in the near future.
The Administration agrees with the thesis that air superiority will greatly aid our efforts in the Pacific. However, at the moment we only have 1 air wing of Patrol Bombers and 1 air wing of Medium Bombers. 2 air wings of Light Bombers which we have at our disposal would be of little use in the Pacific, because of their extremely limited range. Practically no effort has been put into improving the quality or increasing the quantity of our bombers outside of those deployed in CAGs. Most of the budget was devoted to fighters. Therefore, if we are to improve our bomber force, we need to invest considerable resources into it. Another option would be to use reserve CAGs from air bases in the Pacific to support our fleets, but with the completion of the latest light carrier, we do not have CAG reserves. In fact, we lack one CAG already, since we have 3 carriers (=6 CAGs) and 3 light carriers (=3 CAGs) and only 8 CAGs at the moment.

*Apparently, 2 of our CAGs were destroyed after one of the Chinese airfields was overrun (either by the enemy forces or by partisans). I forgot to mention it, sorry. I probably didn't even notice it - this is the price we paid for not guarding provinces with airfields properly. However, we have 1 CAG in production "reserve" which can be completed quickly.

South Priority needs to be conducted swiftly, a show of direct force. The Philippines needs to be taken. Pending Admiral Baltersars approval and a full account of the current strength of our Marine Corps (I can't appear to see their unit icons for their numbers/location).
SNLF corps is stationed on Taiwan. It consists of 15 naval infantry brigades, as shown in the report under the "Economy, war readiness and other matters" section.

I shall release a single fleet** for current patrol, and support of the mission to take the Philippines. The rest of the carrier fleet shall remain at port for saving oil consumption, unless the Americans come within sight of the home islands, Chinese Coast or begin attacks of their own against our pacific assets. To that end the other carrier assets shall be configured;
Does this mean that the Admiral requests to release the CTFs fleets from the missions they are currently undertaking, i.e. supporting our troops in China? Or does the Admiral plan to relocate CAGs to airfields and continue supporting our troops in China in that manner?

With the fall of the ROC we should immediately switch our CAG focus to naval roll
Should we terminate the development of CAG Land Focus?
 
I regret that due to lack of time, that I must resign my General position.

I will be talking in the discussion thread, but other than that, this is it.

Good Bye, and may we be victorious against the U.S!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.