i think it was the lebensraum-ish one.
and what do you think about cleaning up the western hemisphere before finishing?
and what do you think about cleaning up the western hemisphere before finishing?
Russia... What is the status of St.Petersburg?
St.Petersburg/Leningrad is a no-go cause it was the capital of The Empire. It should be Sevastapol or Novorosisk would be fit IMO.
For Germany, Wolfsburg, close the Berlin, like India did might be good. Otherwise Hamburg is a great option.
UK, it should be in England, anywhere that hasn't been nuked yet qualifies.
My point is that USA should a bit, how to say STFU about antinazi propaganda (No offense), because it cant afford such.
I think it's been stated earlier, but much of the German civilian population would have been evacuated east from the allied advance into Europe - it was quite slow through all those fortifications. Ok, no evacuation from the nukes, but losses would have been lower.
Germany, Hamburg gets my vote.
Sorry to say so (as a native of Hamburg), but that's a really bad choice, historically. If Frankfurt wasn't bombed, that should be your first choice, after all this was were new emperors were crowned for several hundert years. If that's been nuked, take Nuremberg/Regensburg - this was where the Imperial Regalia were being kept for centuries and where the old Reichstag convened. (all of this refers to the First Empire - the Holy Roman one.)
Total causalities.
UK:
Sheffield 400,000
Birmingham 2,000,000
Glasgow 500,000
Edinburgh 400,000
Norwich 80,000
London 6,000,000
Liverpool 320,000
Total:9,700,000
Germany:
Berlin 3-4,000,000
Vienna 1,500,000
Prague 800,000
Gottingen 80,000
Wolfsburg 90,000
Munich 1,000,000
Total: 7,470,000
US:
Philadelphia 1,500,000
Detroit 600,000
New York 7,000,000
Atlantic City 30,000
Washington DC 2,500,000
Total:11,630,000
The causalities would be this high from the nuclear fallout spreading to the Metropolitan zones around the larger cities.
Deaths from the Atom bomb wouldn't be 100%. The Hiroshima bomb killed roughly 140,000 out of 300,000 (give or take 10,000). That's more or less 46%.
Quick question are those modern population counts? Because if they are in the 1950s the people per city would be lower. In this timeline it would be lower then OTL 1950s as well.
I thought so at first too, but remember, these bombs were bigger then hiroshima and combines fallout figures with it.
Exactly, I did rough estimates of Population growth in the 50s and and factored the towns and suburban areas that surrounds cities. The Fallout effect would have been devastating for many many miles.
Total causalities.
[snip...]
Total:11,630,000
The causalities would be this high from the nuclear fallout spreading to the Metropolitan zones around the larger cities.
Naval bases (Iceland)Delex said:(War reperations, disbanding the army navy, giving up colonies, naval bases ETC...).
It is coming. I still have an event somewhere that is bugging things up I am de-bugging. I still have enough updates to go that I can work on it without holding the AAR up. That would be why I am not posting every two days anymore too (aside from work).OAM said:Also yes, wheres that map of Europe?!?
frigidmagi said:And on what rail cars would they go east on? On what rail roads? Every rail car full of people is one not carrying fuel, ammo and food for the troops. Bluntly the logistics aren't there to move millions of people over a thousand miles and set them up in hostile territory without leaving them die at the hands of angry partisans.
It's very unlikely that Germany could have moved that many people given how much else it has to move and over how much territory. Not to mention moving those people slows down the military units that are needed to actually stop the Allies. If the people fled, which is likely they did it themselves with very little government help.
rule_them_all said:but then again, think about the nuclear winter, and the contamination of food provoked by radiation, along to smaller productions of food. that should have killed some 100 million people after a 14 years total war.
in the 50s the population was around 3 billion, in this timeline it should be around 2.4-2.3 billions.