i believe that before UN there was no treaty saying anything about "national waters" and "neutral waters" so i think that you sending your fleet on no real purpose near Transamurs coastline should be seen as declaration of war ;]
These are merely Russian Military Naval exercises in her sovereign territories, no matter what the locals say about not being part of russia!
Stormbringer said:
Good read. I think that it is actually best to not build anything until 1937 at the earliest. In fact I disbanded the entire fleet in my game because it is quite useless.
Chernov isn't incharge of an army, nor is he a duke of some merit. It's a bit of appeasement toward those who are in charge... after all, the last time an Admiral decided he was unhappy, Kerensky nearly lost it all!
CarbrBard said:
No, the Reds Won! Run Away!
I usually when playing Russia prioritize Reinforcments and Upgrades, then later I think about creating a new Airforce and some new Tanks.
I'm currently doing that. You pretty much are following the same idea.
Morlak said:
Don't worry about Kolchak, you can always control them by the events (it may cost you some dissent, but it's worth it)
Oh, I know. President Chernov doesn't.
Delex said:
Too bad the first event, where you chose your ideology was not let to be voted on.
Ah, but that event required an immediate reaction by one of the four power groups. Therefore I play it as Me, Myself and I making the snap decision. I actually sat for a 2hr period thinking about how I was going to tell my story.
Mico94 said:
i hope you changed Yagoda from his position (+ 5% CG ain't nice)
anyway, nice to see good comrades in power
At this point the only replacement is Spiridinova, with her Prince of Terror +10% CG need and no foreign territory to exploit... he's the better choice (and believe you me, I'd never had thought Genrikh Yagoda would ever be a better choice...)
~~~
Update to follow.