Wow that's quite a list... This promises to be a nice patch (and DLC) I'm looking forward to it.
Alternatively the change in the de jure set up, with the Wendic kingdom of Pomerania being divided between Poland and the HRE (Germany) could be scripted into the history files of the duchy titles.
I also not agree with your HRE in Italy example, but that's in part on how the game handles the relationship between the HRE and Italy. To use game terms historically the kingdom of Italy was a de jure part of the HRE with the elected Roman-German king (elected by the electoral nobles of the German Kingdom (initially including the duchy of Bohemia and later together with the kingdom of Bohemia)) also becoming king of Italy (at least not directly elected).
Maybe instead to represent the 'de jure' relationship the HRE had with the Italy and Burgundy, it perhaps should get it's own 'imperial' CB. Obviously this should be limited to those kingdoms (Italy and Burgundy), which historically were a part of the HRE, but in game aren't. Furthermore it should be restricted to certain conditions, only successful should be able to put them back into the fold; finally on victory they should return as vassal. So basically a way to mimic a de jure cb (under certain conditions) for the HRE in these areas, which for gameplay reasons aren't made a part of the HRE.
Regarding the latter I'm wondering that too, but I'm not sure Tanistry would be the best way to represent this, since that basically was a de jure elective monarchy with a de facto primogeniture succession.Nice, ... would Tanistry also work as the 'pseudo-elective' succession many thrones had in the later part of the game, where it de jure were elective, but de facto was more of a hereditary kingdom, with the kingdom staying within said family
I beg to differ, historically for the larger part of the timespan covered by the game the HRE did rule these areas. Certainly when the in game kingdom covers Saxony, Meissen, Brandenburg and Mecklenburg (IMHO especially the first three should belong to the German Kingdom; but one can debate over Mecklenburg). Pomerania and Pomeralia initially went to Poland, but at the end of the period covered the former also was a part of the HRE.Didn't make sense anyhow with HRE only rarely actually ruling those parts
Alternatively the change in the de jure set up, with the Wendic kingdom of Pomerania being divided between Poland and the HRE (Germany) could be scripted into the history files of the duchy titles.
good, helps stop the gamey 'accept independence, war each isolated with superior forces' that specially AI HRE loves doing in Italy
I also not agree with your HRE in Italy example, but that's in part on how the game handles the relationship between the HRE and Italy. To use game terms historically the kingdom of Italy was a de jure part of the HRE with the elected Roman-German king (elected by the electoral nobles of the German Kingdom (initially including the duchy of Bohemia and later together with the kingdom of Bohemia)) also becoming king of Italy (at least not directly elected).
Maybe instead to represent the 'de jure' relationship the HRE had with the Italy and Burgundy, it perhaps should get it's own 'imperial' CB. Obviously this should be limited to those kingdoms (Italy and Burgundy), which historically were a part of the HRE, but in game aren't. Furthermore it should be restricted to certain conditions, only successful should be able to put them back into the fold; finally on victory they should return as vassal. So basically a way to mimic a de jure cb (under certain conditions) for the HRE in these areas, which for gameplay reasons aren't made a part of the HRE.
Last edited: