Where did this misconception that alxeu wasn't subbing come from?
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Votecount ~ 23 hours to deadline:
Falc: 1
Enkhuush[#850]
Enkhuush: 1
Randakar[#856]
LatinKaiser: 1
Madchemist[#860]
Not Voted: Bunch of people
Falc: 1
Enkhuush[#850]
Enkhuush: 1
Randakar[#856]
LatinKaiser: 1
Madchemist[#860]
Not Voted: Bunch of people
Well, I for one am willing to listen to others when I have no great ideas myself.
Unvote Enkhuush
Vote LatinKaiser
Because lynching him gives us information on Aedan.
In theory you have a point, but usually the problem is that there are simply too many of them.
edit: And in completely unrelated news, I have a deadline in which I have to complete an online course but parts of that course are unavailable, and at 21:00 GMT the entire educational site will go down for maintenance
Ah, I must have missed that then.
Thank you for the compliment, I'm just trying my best and seeing where that takes me.
Well, you were right, I apologize for not heeding your post.
Looking at the votes, Johho was the only player to vote for (and stay on) Dadarian both days. It probably doesn't mean much and definitely isn't enough to put a vote on him, but madchemist's comments about voting out players who target bad candidates made me check.
I think randy has a decent point with enkhuush, again though, not much.
And madchemist, can you briefly explain why you're voting for LK?
I've sort of explained already here, and his vote record is now demonstrably bad on top of that (randy day 1, who I think is a likely goodie, and Dadarian day 2).
LatinKaiser: 2
Madchemist[#860]
Randakar[#856 Enkhuush -> 864]
Falc: 1
Enkhuush[#850]
happycats: 1
Kaisersohaib[#867]
Not Voted: Bunch of people
Madchemist[#860]
Randakar[#856 Enkhuush -> 864]
Falc: 1
Enkhuush[#850]
happycats: 1
Kaisersohaib[#867]
Not Voted: Bunch of people
Actually it may have come from aedan first. Let me rearead.
Unvote: Taimus so as not to edit vote posts
Unvote: Taimus so as not to edit vote posts
Panzer Commader said:
The proper collective noun to use here is a wagon of voters.
Edit:C-c-combobreaker, I choose you!
Tr-tr-tr-triple post!
All with votes though.
Vote: aedan777
Seemed to push the sui kill hardest. Strong baddie vibes.
All with votes though.
Vote: aedan777
Seemed to push the sui kill hardest. Strong baddie vibes.
Ah thank you, I see what you're saying now. It's definitely something worth considering.
Hello, mr. 2 word voter.
Please explain why you are voting for a new player that is actually contributing in a constructive fashion to this game.
Thank you.
Disagree. Suirantes was arguably the better choice of the two final candidates, and aedan has been more or less his usual self in this game, to my reckoning.
Um, what? Early game is the BEST time to use CAWZ. In fact, it's just about the only time you can use it. After the first few days you should always have an in-game reason to vote someone. Day 1, and to an extent 2 and 3 you usually don't, and so it is the only time you can get rid of quieter players as an end in itself. Not sure where this idea came from.
And the sub thing was weird. I'm remember explicitly saying whomever died day 1 would probably get to sub in, and alxeu immediately applied for sub when he got lynched.
Contribution does not mean that he couldn't be a wolf, I will not refrain from voting an active player.
My reasons are that he "contributes" with very "original" cases that have failed on and on, his votes are also interesting if you look at the recent votecounts.
Because it's generally poor form to kill first time players early in a game without a really compelling reason. If his arguments don't make sense to you, he's a new player so that's to be expected.