I support the formation of the Nacionales Independientes
Maybe Partido Tradicionale? ((somewhat stolen from Rogov's Union Tradicionale))
Maybe Partido Tradicionale? ((somewhat stolen from Rogov's Union Tradicionale))
Though the demise of the Partido Monarquíco is truly a victory for democracy in Chile, there still remains the threat from the Liberales. We must look to the future and build a Bloc of Nacionales and Conservadores which is capable of hold off the anarchy which the Liberales seek to institute as state policy. I would also advise Presidente Romano to look closely at his supporters, ministers, and generals, and to think hard about whether or not they are truly committed to Chilean democracy, or if they work solely for power and would do anything they could to achieve as much of it as possible. We do not need another challenge to Chilean democracy from within the elected government itself.
((I like Rogov's proposed name for the new party. It reminds me of the traditionalists from Spain who supported the Carlists, they had a party named the Comuníon Tradicional with the same politics as our Nacionales Independientes.))
I take offence to that remark. I am wholly for the defence of Chile and what the Chilean identity stands for. The fact that you're insinuating that I'm only in this for the power is quite surprising. If I was in this solely for the gain of power then I would have voted for Romano to secure my position. I did not, because I supported both sides equally and thus put my position at risk. So, I would ask you to reconsider your statement as I am not into it for personal power, and I am certain that I am not the only one.
- General Jorge Alejandro Santandera
One who take such offence at remarks which fail to identify any individual person must obviously have something to hide.
"This ambitious plan has the purpose of not only to silence my critics, but also to make Chile a better place. On a side note, I have in my last term improved Chilean and Brazilian relationship. In order to finalize our strong position in south america, is a military alliance with Brazil. The alliance has the purpose to forever stay secure against the Bolivians, the Peruvians and Argentinians. With such an alliance, even if they all three struck us, then they could not defeat us. Which is why I wish the congreso to vote on an alliance request to Brazil which -if approved- will be signed in Santiago, and thus be called the Pact of Santiago."
- El Presidente
Pallen, we already have an alliance with Brazil. They fought with Chile in both the liberation of Potosi and Patagonia.
One who take such offence at remarks which fail to identify any individual person must obviously have something to hide.
Mr. Senator Manuel Armando Prieto de las Casas, I laugh when you claim that the Liberales are a threat to democracy. We have kept the tradition alive for our years of rule, and we have greatly improved Chile in many ways: we have enlarged our military, we have expanded our borders and set the standard for the following presidents. We have brought many highly literate immigrants and incorporated them into our nation and succesfully used their superior knowledge to beat our enemies. We have kickstarted the economy and you all owe us a big thank you. I see no way that the liberals have harmed the nation.
Also, it seems that the generals and the conservatives are really plotting something. Let us keep Chile free! Let me present my Military Transparency Bill that proposes that a minimum amount of generals (at least two) must be from opposition parties, so that no coup can effectively undermine our democracy.
((Chile is seriously needing some liberales. I mean, dude there's like three major blocs: the conservatives, the militarist nationalists and the reactionary nationalists ))