Emergency Resolution Initiative: NO!
Military Non-Partisan Act: No
Industrial Encouragement Act: No
- Pablo Garcia, Trade Unionist
Military Non-Partisan Act: No
Industrial Encouragement Act: No
- Pablo Garcia, Trade Unionist
May I ask, why do people in this congreso dislike the Industry encouragement act?
Emergency Resolution Initiative: No. The duties of the governmental branches in military appointments needs reforming, but we set a dangerous precedent (...) if we give power over entirely to one man to determine the army against the intent of prior laws of Chile
The Chief of Staff only has control over some armies, Señor. There is a difference between some and all, and I would rather not hand the country over to mad or sane men of any political ideology. If segregation is necessary for that goal to be reached in the short run before a more thorough and judicious regulation of the military appointments can be made, then so be it.You are contradicting yourself. You speak of limiting the president's power to determine the army against the laws of Chile, but you prefer to give that same power -the power of giving one man absolute control over the armies of the country- to the Chief of Staff. How is it that the CoS is any better than the elected President? Atleast the president would have to comply with congress.. but chief of staff Rios isn't taking orders from the President or the congress. You are practically handing over the country to a leftist madman.
In implementing the original President's plan for army appointments, the initiative still gives all appointments over to the will of the President - albeit a will already exercised. Without the duties of a Chief of Staff being fulfilled, there is no regulation of those appointments, and the Congress is not regulating it or checking the power of the executive simply by saying yes or no to the appointments in general. When legislators meet, they do not just debate bills as a whole, but must consider amendments and revisions so as to correct errors or bring about a compromise. I still stand against the initiative, and urge the senators to find a better path to resolving the problem without simply giving it up to the President.I believe the honourable Admiral's opposition stems from a cruicial misunderstanding of the Initiative.
The Initiative does not empower the President to make appointments at will. All it does is implement the original army appointments that were drawn up at the beginning of my term. Any subsequent change in command would have to be carried out in the traditional manner, vis-à-vis the President and the Chief of Staff. This is a single-instance decision. If later in my term, I should choose to appoint new generals, I would require the consensus of the Chief of Staff to do so. It does not undermine the Chief of Staff or render him redundant. It merely resolves this current debate, which has crippled our military with factionalism.
I hope this clears things up for Admiral Alvarez, and shows that my intentions are not to concentrate power in my own hands but to resolve a constitutional crisis by congressional vote.
- President Charles Maximilien de Conti