Maybe a Prussian player would like to join that middle block with Germany again, away from the axis?
Dude, the only reason I need 'freeing' is because you betrayed me in the first place. My attitude comes from being betrayed by you twice in two successive wars. How is this ignorant? I appreciate the crumbs you are throwing me, Germany to is 1905 borders is great. But when your rhetoric doesn't match your actions and I end up getting the fuzzy end again and again while you say you are helping me, I feel the need to speak out. Sure, I gain some territory, but at the expense of the one person in this game recently who has actually shown himself to be a good sport and a decent fellow. So now I am hurting my alliance with this little expansion. I notice your 'help' for Germany doesn't involve me keeping Skane. So yeah, I am telling you that your words and actions don't match up, when they do I will be the first to thank you for helping Germany, until then I wish you wouldn't say you 'give up' as that implies you have been even trying to help in the first place.
Oh yesCan you even do that ? I mean do you have interventionism =>5 ?
I would like to reiterate my interest in taking the reins of the long-suffering Old World Italians, should their independence remain on the table after the French are done with the peace negotiations.
-edit- And those Italian borders are absurd! That state would be a de facto Georgian puppet, as there is no way they would be capable of defending themselves against a Georgian attack. Were I in charge of the Italian nationalist caucus at Versailles (or wherever these negotiations are underway) I would argue strenuously for limiting the Georgian gains to Venice; perhaps with some payment of resources to the Georgians as compensation.
Well you heard Germany players own views, he doesen't appriciate any efforts to restore his nation. Thus restoring Germany is no longer anyone interest (it never have been aside Axis).
Germany has never been since 1936 In any position to dicatate nor even negotiate for any terms over others helping him. He was in position where his existence was solely dependable over others mercy...He didn't realise it. His lost.
Get your facts rigth:
France offer peace two times: WP after the first war session. Back then I vote for accepting it, others in the war helping Germany voted no. That was mistake by us, and I've admitted it allready.
The seccond peace offer was made by France to Georgia and that was the ultimate "Backstabbing" peace deal that all the fuzz came about. It included relatively free Germany with loss of provinces that Germany took From France in 1905...
The third and final peace came when China (after knowing about that above mentioned peace) Bailed out and left Axis to figth against France. France beated us and drove us from German soil and started to advance into our land. We asked terms for Axis then and Loose few provinces in Prussia. Only after that Germany was left for mercy of France.
Limited German military:
50 land divisions total, with no more than 5 of these being armored.
8 air divisions total
Non-aggression pact, with the following:
Military access given to France
No military access or alliances with enemies of France.
Resource deal:
150 energy and 75 metal to France
30 supplies to Germany
It looks like that is the whole point of the release of Italy: A strengthening of Georgian power that does not look as obvious as direct annexation of Italy. Smart strategy, though.
I once spend two weeks bargaining with the german player to end the centuries old cold war division in europe and form a first joint HRE-Samoyeds alliance against France...
I woke up in next morning and read that Germany had signed a NAP with France...
PS: to further emphasis the issue, Finnish troops won germany troops with numerially inferior ammounts so Germany should focus on getting it's army into shape...