FlyingDutchie: A bit more finesse, but not much more.
Sokraates: It's possible that I'm more reckless. Personally, I think I'm about the same as before, but there's just more provinces to be reckless in, so my handful of forces don't cover the front as they used to, so I'm weaker (and more reckless) compared to previously, if that makes any sense.
Oh, and welcome! Good to see another friendly face.
Piko: Yeah, it was precarious for a bit, but it's all right now. I'm definitely looking forward to more challenges though.
Baltasar: I hope the British prove to be more troublesome. They're the closest thing to a world superpower at this moment, or should be at any rate, regardless of the fact that they're badly declining. If they're not a spot of trouble, something is wrong.
Maj. von Mauser: Hey, there's always the history forum.
As for those French provinces, AFAIK I didn't get them.
Baltasar: That's a good idea too.
Valentinan: My 7a Armata commanders are pretty good actually, certainly the cream of the crop. I think my best three there are Messe, Roatta and Bitossi but the rest are pretty good true. To be fair though, I find myself spoiled when playing a major power, given that I'm used to leader-starved minors.
Stuyvesant: I'll leave the forces on the French border alone for now as I don't need them yet. Plus, I'd need to reorganize those two corps-sized armies into one two-corps army and I want to procrastinate on that as long as possible. Is it possible to drag and drop when it comes to army organization?
Evil4Zerggin: I think that makes sense, more or less, yeah.
Cacahuananche: Oooh that's terrible.
As for Suez, I've already got an army earmarked for that. The two armies on the French border will be amalgamated into one and then I'll use them where I need them.