Okay, so to some replies finally, starting from the last set of unreplied replies:
RGB - I guess I mentally saw Manuel's end as him getting bored - to him politics and intrigue is a game almost. Konstantinopolis was boring, so he moved to a new, more pristine venue to play.
As for Basil, he's grown a little cocky - considering the odds he's faced and the age he is, it's little wonder why. He's 23 years old, faced insurmountable odds, and is considered the living embodiment of his grandfather. He firmly believes God is on his side, so why should he fear the Moors, even if they outnumber him all told ten to one?
As for linking... I should do that! I think I'll do it later on tonight!
asd21593 - Noticed the avatar change. Excellent choice.
Wars are always risky endeavors, especially wars far from home with few men behind you... messy indeed...
Estonianzulu - Quite a few, yes, though technically in game Nikolaios reigned only 6 years. Part of the reason the average was so long was Demetrios' absurdly long reign - 45 years on the throne. Manuel was there for a long 28 years as well.
Oh, and don't expect the other Kings of Europe to sit aside as Basil attempts to gobble all of Iberia. France especially has a vested interest in the regions just south of her border, and as the French King is technically also sovereign over the Crusader States of Algeria, he's going to be taking a personal interest into what happens in what he increasingly views as "his end of the pond."
"Volatile" doesn't begin to describe this group of villains...
Enewald - If you remember, what happened with Manuel and Egypt was that he conquered all of the Delta without consulting Nikolaios, and Nik took Alexandria for the Imperial desmense and made Manuel give the rest back. One of Manuel's first acts as Emperor was to swiftly retake the rest of Egypt as Romanoi. In game, Nik only took Alexandria, and Manuel cleaned up the rest in his reign.
And yes, Basil is going crusading, much as the real Manuel Komnenos "did." Save the real Manuel Komnenos, as soon as the situation had changed, left the Crusaders of Antioch to their own devices and went home. It remains to be seen if Basil will carry on that tradition, or if he'll truly "crusade."
As for 38 bastards
How in heaven's name did you get that many?!
AlexanderPrimus - In the realm of the Kings in Rome, to me, it seems the biggest problem is going to be simple coordination and cooperation. The Iberian peninsula is quiet large, and these monarchs (or at least their troops, assuming they all commit to the Crusade) have a great distance to march. Also, Boleslav isn't "the Bold," he's self-titled himself that. The rest of Europe has less savory names for him.
As for Rodrigo not saying anything in the exchange... well... look at his traits. You tell me if you think something is going on.
And yes, Basil might be a genius, but there is
always a very thin line between genius and madness... and often that line gets blurry.
Irenicus - Indeed Demetrios was a mighty conqueror. Partly that's because he started off with a relatively strong Empire and absurdly strong personal lands (before the Imperial title, Demetrios was prince of three of the largest
themes in the Empire). If I had the gains broken up into individual wars, though, you'd notice that alot of his conflicts took only three or four provinces, and thats it - other than Cyrenaica and the last Seljuk War, that is how all his wars operated. So his reign was more a series of small gains over an absurdly long time (45 years) with two massive gains - one in the middle and one at the very end.
Basil - schizophrenic? He took a heavy blow to the head at Jerusalem, and its only
after that the visions began. But then again, how would he, or anyone else, know it was divine intervention versus a hallucination? I guess we'll just have to find out...
Fulcrumvale - When Romanion has a bad Emperor (it's not an if, its coming quickly down the road), alot will depend on the Imperial bureaucracy - how much good inertia is left? Also, alot will depend on the loyalty of the
themes - they might easily be more loyal to a bad emperor that liberally bribes them and empties the treasury than a good emperor who hoards his money and spends little.
As for the possibility of an insane Emperor, yes, you will see the results of that.
And true, disasters tend to have very very long preludes. Romanion's final fate will be no different.
And perhaps Basil needs a lesson in humility right now... you never know how handy it might come in later... I wouldn't call those who he's about to head to war with from the rest of Europe "geniuses." In game, its more when the Pope issued the call for a Crusade against Cordoba, every single European county, duchy and kingdom pounced...
Nikolai - Great commanders sometimes make really dumb assessments or even stupider mistakes. What separates a great commander is his ability to recover from a moment of idiocy, not necessarily not having said moments.
Eams - :rofl: I don't think "Here's Ioannis!" works as well as "Here's Johnny!" I might be mistaken! As for whether Basil is mad or not... as for this motley group of monarchs, I'm not sure they could equally divide a stuffed teddy bear, let alone an entire peninsula...
English Patriot - Likely, the Hispanian campaign will be the most ambitious launched since Justinian... and since the Turks have been bled dry, if there was a time to reach for the impossible, it'd be now. And coordination by far is going to be the hardest issue for the Crusaders (see above), not just spoils of conquest...
TC Pilot - Ah! Someone who still believes in Basil, and that he's not crazy! Hooray!
junrui - Hey! Congratulations, you've made it! Glad to hear you've enjoyed what you've read so far!
The next update is about 60% done right now, so it will probably be up tomorrow afternoon some time. Glad to hear everyone is enjoying things!