• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Wixelt

Lt. General
44 Badges
Apr 17, 2016
1.658
795
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 2
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
Title.
 
Well, the title is very misleading, to say the least.
I don't know what leads you to believe that, we just posted a more than 2000 words long development diary showcasing our progress and post continuously: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...-info-news-links.829142/page-12#post-25664228 So no the mod is [still being developed], otherwise there wouldn't be development everyday and we wouldn't be constantly replying here on the forums.
Maybe you could edit it to reflect the actual situation, namely that of a very reduced team developing the mod at a slow pace?
 
?????? An answer to a similar question asked in August 2019 in irrelevant in Febuary 2020 [I can see all your OT forum posts and those aren't "replying constantly" FYI]. Save the "title is very misleading" for actually misleading questions, please.
 
An answer to a similar question asked in August 2019 in irrelevant in Febuary 2020
I never said your question was irrelevant, I said it was misleading.

I can see all your OT forum posts and those aren't "replying constantly" FYI
I was referring to this forum and other channels about the mod, where questions are being replied to. If you consider that we don't reply, please point us to questions that would have been left unanswered. Me having replied on the OT forum or not is irrelevant in the context.

Save the "title is very misleading" for actually misleading questions, please.
The title is misleading because it implies the mod would not be developed, which it is until we announce the opposite. If you had asked "is the mod still developed" or "what is the latest progress" it would had been fair. Instead you ask "why is the mod not being developed", which wrongly leads the reader to think the mod would no longer be developed.
 
It's what it is
I'm not sure I get what you are trying to say? If you are referring to the title of the thread, it can be edited.