25/50/75 souds better to me also when speaked MP, but organization can be lower maybe 10 / 30 / 50
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
This is way more important than the specific percentages. 25/50/75% Strength sounds good to me though.
Any confirmation if this is individual based or an average for all planes int he group? My observations tend to say that it is an average for the group as I see plaens on missions where the first plane in the group has very low organization but the other two are full. Of course I have no clue what stance the AI is using against me. Often the first plane in the group is the target and takes the most damage.
it is the average, I believe. I've used aerial HQ's on full AI control in ICE and have seen my planes on missions where one wing has, say, 75%, while another one is at 100% and the third one is below the threshold I set.
Any updates to the "stance" behaviors for air & naval in TFH?
I thought I read somewhere that interceptors on passive would only intercept over friendly territory, but I can't find it now.
I thought I read somewhere that interceptors on passive would only intercept over friendly territory, but I can't find it now.
The settings in TFH are for organization, aggressive - .10 (10%); defensive - .30; passive - .50. Strenght settings are: agressive - .25; defensive - .30; passive - .75.
I don't know if the mechanics are different though.
This thread is well over a year old. Posting in old threads is not allowed except in special circumstances. Please start a new topic if you have questions like this.
Thread closed.
Thread closed.
- Status