• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
((I just forgot to fix it. I'll do it tomorrow.))

((Also add the NLPD as a party. It has four members you know :)))

There have been many calls recently by our Liberal friends for "political reform" - as I understand it, the NLPD has based its electoral campaign on "change in both social and political reforms". But now the old proposal of secret ballots has been enacted by the Republic, I would be interested to learn what our Liberal parties believe remains to be done in the name of "political reform". We have universal suffrage, with the Reichstag proportionally representing the whole of society by population, not wealth, and we have freedom of speech, of assembly, of public meetings, of trade unions. In a world where many countries still practice hereditary monarchy - and even chattel slavery - the Republic stands out as a shining beacon in the freedom of its electorate.

And in such a Republic, what need is there for multiple political parties dedicated to electoral reform? What political reform even remains for them to advocate?

Herr Adimari. You know social reforms. The poor workers who use their body for their whole lives get nothing from the Republic when they get old. People work from early morning to late night and have you ever heard about the safety of a factory in Germany? It is unacceptable. There are many other things wrong with the German society I want to have changed.

And about the need of more than one liberal party. I will answer this question, with a question: Why does Germany need two conservative parties?

~Konrad von Schwaben
 
Last edited:
'Tis a glorious day for the Republic. We are one step closer to Total Liberation.

-the Liberator
Liberation from what? Your sanity? Reality?
-Albrecht von Spinoza
 
((Your party will not exist until the next election since you have no voters and no elected officials by game standards. Avi could add your party now but then all of your members have no ability to vote.))
 
((Your party will not exist until the next election since you have no voters and no elected officials by game standards. Avi could add your party now but then all of your members have no ability to vote.))

((Oh, that makes sense. Then, you Avi may wait until the next election.))
 
Herr Adimari. You know social reforms. The poor workers who use their body for their whole lives get nothing from the Republic when they get old. People work from early morning to late night and have you ever heard about the safety of a factory in Germany? It is unacceptable. There are many other things wrong with the German society I want to have changed.

Aah, so the NLPD is in fact a Socialist party rather than a Liberal one?

But regarding the need for Liberal parties, I may not have made myself clear. I was not asking why the Republic needs more than one Liberal party; I was asking why the Republic needs any Liberal parties at all.

The free-market ideology is pushed forwards by the Anarcho-Liberal DDA, which seems to gain about as much popular support as one would expect from such an economic policy. And calls for socialist reforms have been chiefly the domain of the self-declaredly Socialist SDAP. I think it likely that the Liberal parties hereon will likely exist only to divide and so weaken these Jacobin or Socialist causes, or to bureaucratically sustain themselves through ontological inertia.

But as for the division between the Conservative parties - sometimes I ask myself the same question, why does the Republic need two conservative parties? Ostensibly, the Hohenzollern Unger Nationalist Party exists for those who take a Jingoist and Kaiserist approach to foreign policy, while the New Society prefers an approach of moderatio rebus omnibus. But sometimes I wonder if such a disagreement really warrants dividing the Conservative vote. Perhaps, someday, there will be a single unified Conservative party, presiding over the preservation of our Republic... If current voting figures do not change much, then it would command a substantial majority of the Reichstag.

But of course, such a unification would require much negotiation and much political discourse between our two parties. One day, perhaps, but not one day any time soon.
 
This is madness! You sheep let that moron von Vanderburg limit the rights of gentlemen! Every one of you swine that voted for that filthy, disgraceful bill are cowards who hide behind women's skirts! You are not men of honour, you are foolish infants not yet weaned off the milk of your mothers' breasts! You disgusting slime, you spineless idiots! You will bring ruin to Germany! You, the harbingers of our downfall! Let any among you who thinks himself a man face me and prove his so-called manhood!

~ Friedrich von Hohenstaufen
 
This is madness! You sheep let that moron von Vanderburg limit the rights of gentlemen! Every one of you swine that voted for that filthy, disgraceful bill are cowards who hide behind women's skirts! You are not men of honour, you are foolish infants not yet weaned off the milk of your mothers' breasts! You disgusting slime, you spineless idiots! You will bring ruin to Germany! You, the harbingers of our downfall! Let any among you who thinks himself a man face me and prove his so-called manhood!

~ Friedrich von Hohenstaufen
I think it is best if you follow me to the tavern and come drink a beer with me to calm down.Such talks.are not needed

Heinrich von Gogh, leader of the SDAP
 
Aah, so the NLPD is in fact a Socialist party rather than a Liberal one?

But regarding the need for Liberal parties, I may not have made myself clear. I was not asking why the Republic needs more than one Liberal party; I was asking why the Republic needs any Liberal parties at all.

The free-market ideology is pushed forwards by the Anarcho-Liberal DDA, which seems to gain about as much popular support as one would expect from such an economic policy. And calls for socialist reforms have been chiefly the domain of the self-declaredly Socialist SDAP. I think it likely that the Liberal parties hereon will likely exist only to divide and so weaken these Jacobin or Socialist causes, or to bureaucratically sustain themselves through ontological inertia.

But as for the division between the Conservative parties - sometimes I ask myself the same question, why does the Republic need two conservative parties? Ostensibly, the Hohenzollern Unger Nationalist Party exists for those who take a Jingoist and Kaiserist approach to foreign policy, while the New Society prefers an approach of moderatio rebus omnibus. But sometimes I wonder if such a disagreement really warrants dividing the Conservative vote. Perhaps, someday, there will be a single unified Conservative party, presiding over the preservation of our Republic... If current voting figures do not change much, then it would command a substantial majority of the Reichstag.

But of course, such a unification would require much negotiation and much political discourse between our two parties. One day, perhaps, but not one day any time soon.

We in the NLPD are not socialist, but I wouldn't discard the opportunity of working together with the SDAP, as they're a most honest party. You say that the liberal parties are only here too weaken socialist and jacobin activities, this is untrue, as I see the DDA and SDAP as a partner in future politics. And I know you hate them, but the last coalition government, had Carlo Brunelli as minister of education, until he was dismissed. That means he was in the government, with his anarcho-libral thoughts.

Now, why do we need two liberal parties? Well, because the UAI is too weak and unstable. They have an anti-military policy which I disagree off. And two parties because, if the voters don't like the UAI, they have another moderate-liberal choice.

And you answered my question by saying you only wanted one party to rule them all. This my dear Adimari, is called a dictatorship. And we have all seen how that went haven't we.
 
Perhaps Herr von Schwabern needs to make up his mind. First he questions why there are two separate Conservative parties, implying that having one Conservative party would be preferable. But then he declares that a single Conservative party would be a "dictatorship" for some reason.

Sadly for Herr von Schwabern, the word "dictatorship" does actually have a dictionary definition. And that definition is not "government that I wouldn't like". If the majority of the population were to vote for one party, such that that one party were able to form a government without establishing a coalition, then that would not be "dictatorship", that would simply be the will of the people, be that a Unified-Conservative majority, an NLPD majority, or even an Imperialist majority.
 
This is madness! You sheep let that moron von Vanderburg limit the rights of gentlemen! Every one of you swine that voted for that filthy, disgraceful bill are cowards who hide behind women's skirts! You are not men of honour, you are foolish infants not yet weaned off the milk of your mothers' breasts! You disgusting slime, you spineless idiots! You will bring ruin to Germany! You, the harbingers of our downfall! Let any among you who thinks himself a man face me and prove his so-called manhood!

~ Friedrich von Hohenstaufen

At a HUN meeting

Men of the HUN, for not the first time Assemblyman von Hohenstaufen has called out against the decisions made by the Republic. His never ending rage against all decisions which he does not support is putting a blemish on our party. His blind ambition coupled with this constant anger at the Republic has put me in a position to call for a vote removing Friedrich von Hohenstaufen from our party. Though he has been among us since the founding, he simply does not hold up to the proper standards that a man of this organization should have. Therefore, I ask you all to vote in favor of removing this man from our party.



Addressing the German Government

"This past year has been a good year for Germany. We have seen our naval power grow with the addition of more naval bases along our coasts as well as an increase in troops stationed in Plymouth. These additional troops have allowed for the Jamaican Crisis of 1863 to blow over without a single shot fired. On top of all this, the minorities of this Republic are finally being properly treated as equal citizens, as they should be. This Republic is stronger than ever.

"With my first announcement of this new year, I wish to name a friend of mine and member of the HUN, Giuseppe Putini, to the position of Minister of Education effective immediately. His time as a soldier in the War of Three Powers will make him the most effective man to take up this position. Secondly, I wish to welcome back Herr Adimari to the world of the living. It is good to have your voice once again in this government. Your words and wisdom has been missed in this age.

"Lastly, this recent epidemic which has struck our capital is truly sad. Among those to lose their lives was the good Doctor, Herr Gotha. Few men can say they had been a greater and important man of this Republic then DDr Gotha. He will be missed and a day in remembrance should be held to honor this man and all others who have lost their lives to these recent plagues on Germany."
 
Liberation from what? Your sanity? Reality?
-Albrecht von Spinoza

Total Liberation is the ultimate goal in the Doctrine Liberation. It is a perfect state of happiness and utopia protected by a just and august government. All the peoples of the world will be free to pursue their own pleasures under Total Liberation.

-the Liberator
 
Total Liberation is the ultimate goal in the Doctrine Liberation. It is a perfect state of happiness and utopia protected by a just and august government. All the peoples of the world will be free to pursue their own pleasures under Total Liberation.

-the Liberator
Sounds like somebody has been stealing from Buddhism and the local opium dealer.
 
Perhaps Herr von Schwabern needs to make up his mind. First he questions why there are two separate Conservative parties, implying that having one Conservative party would be preferable. But then he declares that a single Conservative party would be a "dictatorship" for some reason.

Sadly for Herr von Schwabern, the word "dictatorship" does actually have a dictionary definition. And that definition is not "government that I wouldn't like". If the majority of the population were to vote for one party, such that that one party were able to form a government without establishing a coalition, then that would not be "dictatorship", that would simply be the will of the people, be that a Unified-Conservative majority, an NLPD majority, or even an Imperialist majority.

You forgot that you said, you didn't want the other parties to exist. That would be dictatorship. If 100% of our population voted for one party, it wouldn't be a dictatorship.
 
At a HUN meeting

Men of the HUN, for not the first time Assemblyman von Hohenstaufen has called out against the decisions made by the Republic. His never ending rage against all decisions which he does not support is putting a blemish on our party. His blind ambition coupled with this constant anger at the Republic has put me in a position to call for a vote removing Friedrich von Hohenstaufen from our party. Though he has been among us since the founding, he simply does not hold up to the proper standards that a man of this organization should have. Therefore, I ask you all to vote in favor of removing this man from our party.

Herr Unger, may I recommend we consider this matter in private? Airing internal party business like this seems... unseemly.

Michael von Hohenzollern

((Let's go to the group to vote on this.))
 
You forgot that you said, you didn't want the other parties to exist. That would be dictatorship. If 100% of our population voted for one party, it wouldn't be a dictatorship.

How dare you, sir. I said no such thing.

I said I saw no reason for the continued existence of the Liberal parties, namely the UAI and the NLPD. Nowhere did I state that I didn't want the DDA to exist, nor the SDAP, nor the Imperialist Party - neither would I oppose the formation of the Lombard Independence Party, nor the Common School Movement Party, were they to legitimise themselves from paramilitary organisations into honest political parties and gain the support of the electorate. I may be conservative, longwinded, noncommittal, Italian, even grandiloquent - but I am not an Imperialist, and I take great offence to being cast as such.

And I'll thank you in future not to put words into my mouth, sir.
 
If I am right, Isnt the NLPD more social-liberal then liberal ? I currently mainly see the NLPD as a fusion between social and liberal ideas put into a party that isnt quite the one, but not quite the other as well.It is quite likeminded to my party,And I am sure we can work out some agreement in the future.

Heinrich von Gogh,Leader of the SDAP
 
If I am right, Isnt the NLPD more social-liberal then liberal ? I currently mainly see the NLPD as a fusion between social and liberal ideas put into a party that isnt quite the one, but not quite the other as well.It is quite likeminded to my party,And I am sure we can work out some agreement in the future.

Heinrich von Gogh,Leader of the SDAP

You are completely correct Herr von Gogh. NLPD is a social-liberal-nationalist party, and I would welcome future cooperation with the SDAP.

~Konrad von Schwaben, Leader of the NLPD
 
You are completely correct Herr von Gogh. NLPD is a social-liberal-nationalist party, and I would welcome future cooperation with the SDAP.

~Konrad von Schwaben, Leader of the NLPD
So, you flip flop once more? Earlier you said that you were like the New Society but pro-reforms! I respected you, Von Schwaben, but that is gone. My father would be turning in his grave.