• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
So if Brandenburg inherits Saxony - who should gain the Saxon electoral vote? Can (and should) Brandenburg have two votes or would the emperor (if the crown is not held not Brandenburg) give it to anther state?
 
So if Brandenburg inherits Saxony - who should gain the Saxon electoral vote? Can (and should) Brandenburg have two votes or would the emperor (if the crown is not held not Brandenburg) give it to anther state?

Historically the emperor always tried to avoid having any dynasty gain two electoral votes (e.g. by preventing that the Palatinate Wittelsbachs and the Bavaria Wittelsbache had 1 vote each). So he would probably not grant another vote to the Hohenzollerns. However in gameterms it´s a moot point as every german state is an "elector".
 
Last edited:
This event is not needed any longer as Marchfeld is Bavarian and owned by Austria from the start. This event is needed in vanilla AGCEEP because Ostmarch is owned by Bohemia from the start to help the Hussites and to represent Tabor. In this map, we have a specific Tabor province.

Or the event could stay in. To make sense Marchfeld should start as bohemian (PV) /czech (AGCEEP) provinceculture. Then a -1 to provincemanpower and the change of culture from czech to bavarian would be something a player would understand.
And the text should not refer to "Ostmarch" and events of the year +/- 1000 but to the battle on the Marchfeld
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_on_the_Marchfeld
where the Habsburgs first took the province from the then-ruler of Bohemia and Austria around the year 1270

Suggested change to provinces.text to have Marchfeld start bohemian:

Code:
province = {
	id = 327
	name = "PROV_Marchfeld"
	continent = "Europe"
	region = "Central Europe"
	area = "Danube"
	type = inland
	terrain = forest
	size_modifier = 0
	climate = ncontinental
	religion = catholic
	culture = [color=yellow]bohemian[/color]
	manpower = 2
	income = 5
	goods = grain
	city_name = "CITY_Marchfeld"
	cot_modifier = 1
	colonization_difficulty = 0
	natives = {
		combat = 0
		ferocity = 0
		efficiency = 0
		tp_negotiation = 0
		tolerance = 0
	}
	gfx = {
		city = { x = 10223 y = 1897 }
		army = { x = 10181 y = 1898 }
		manufactory = { x = 10177 y = 1897 }
	}
	history = { }
}

and to AGCEEP_Specific_Austria.eue

Code:
#(1419-1820) [color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color] and Habsburgs Hereditary Lands
event = {
	id = 179141
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 327 data = -1 } #[color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color]
                [color=yellow]control = { province = 327 data = -1 }[/color]
	}
	random = no
	country = HAB
	name = "EVENTNAME129048" #[color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color]and Habsburgs Hereditary Lands
	desc = "EVENTHIST129048"
	#-#In 976, the march ruled by the Babenberg family was described as regione vulgari vocabulo Ostarrîchi, that is, the region called 'Ostarrîchi' (the Eastern Realm) in the vernacular. The term Ostarrîchi is linguistic ancestor of the German name for Austria, Österreich. Under Ernest the Brave (1055–1075), the colonisation of the Waldviertel was begun and the Bohemian and Hungarian marches were united to Austria.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { year = 1820 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME129048A" #[color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color]belongs to Austria
		command = { type = provincemanpower which = 327 value = -1 } #[color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color]
		command = { type = provinceculture which = 327 value = bavarian } #[color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color]
		command = { type = trigger which = 398020 } #ROM: [color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color]and Habsburgs Hereditary Lands
		command = { type = trigger which = 129049 } #BOH: [color=red]Ostmarch[/color][color=yellow]Marchfeld[/color]and Habsburgs Hereditary Lands
	}
}
 
Last edited:
Luxemburg or rather
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayern-Straubing
has dutch culture (to rule Holland) and franconian(german) to rule Luxemburg. However their ancestral lands as Wittelsbachs in Bavaria is bavarian culture and they lack that...

I suggest to give them all 3 cultures at the start of the game in 1419_LUX_Luxemburg.inc

Code:
culture = { 
		type = franconian
		type = dutch
		[color=yellow]type = bavarian[/color]
	}
 
Bavaria setup:

Bavaria (BAY) has two provinces at the start of the game, +3 stability, national cores on both.

However historically there were *4* bavarian duchys. Bavaria-Straubing (=Luxemburg ingame) is one of them.
The 3 others (Bayern-München, Bayern-Landshut and Bayern-Ingolstadt)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria-Munich#mediaviewer/File:Bayern_nach_der_Teilung_1392.png
are all represented by "Bavaria" ingame.

The ruler Bavaria starts with "Ernst" is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest,_Duke_of_Bavaria
the Duke of Bavaria-Munich/Bayern-München. Ernst and the other two dukes within "Bavaria" were not on good terms. Between 1420 and 1422 there was open warfare. German WIKI, as I found nothing about the bavarian war on the english site:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayerischer_Krieg_(1420–1422)

I suggest to reduce both national cores to claimcores to represent that Bavaria-Munich only ruled 1/3rd of the area that it has ingame:

Change to 1419_BAY-Bavaria.inc:

Code:
[color=red]nationalprovinces = {
		349 869
	}[/color]
[color=yellow]claimedprovinces = {
                349 869
	}[/color]
...
technology = {
		stability = { level = [color=red]3[/color][color=yellow]2[/color] value = 0 }
		infra = { level = 1 value = 50 }
		trade = { level = 1 value = 50 }
		land = { level = 1 value = 0 }
		naval = { level = 1 value = 0 }
	}

and to 1419_Provinces_Misc.inc:

Code:
[color=yellow]province = { id = 349 nationalism = { year = 1419 month = january day = 1 } } #Bavaria-Landshut
province = { id = 869 nationalism = { year = 1419 month = january day = 1 } } #Bavaria-Ingolstadt[/color]
 
Last edited:
Or the event could stay in. To make sense Marchfeld should start as bohemian (PV) /czech (AGCEEP) provinceculture. Then a -1 to provincemanpower and the change of culture from czech to bavarian would be something a player would understand.
And the text should not refer to "Ostmarch" and events of the year +/- 1000 but to the battle on the Marchfeld
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_on_the_Marchfeld
where the Habsburgs first took the province from the then-ruler of Bohemia and Austria around the year 1270

Suggested change to provinces.text to have Marchfeld start bohemian:
Was this part of Lower Austria still Bohemian/Czech by 1419?

Luxemburg or rather
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayern-Straubing
has dutch culture (to rule Holland) and franconian(german) to rule Luxemburg. However their ancestral lands as Wittelsbachs in Bavaria is bavarian culture and they lack that...

I suggest to give them all 3 cultures at the start of the game in 1419_LUX_Luxemburg.inc

Code:
culture = { 
        type = franconian
        type = dutch
        [COLOR=yellow]type = bavarian[/COLOR]
    }
To be honest I don't like the German split (which I did myself) as it complicates things unnecessarily. IMO the culture in the Germanic lands of the Holy Roman Empire should simply be 'German'. 'Dutch' culture should only emerge when the Dutch achieve nationhood and Dutch language stops being considered like any other German dialect.
 
Bavaria setup:

Bavaria (BAY) has two provinces at the start of the game, +3 stability, national cores on both.

However historically there were *4* bavarian duchys. Bavaria-Straubing (=Luxemburg ingame) is one of them.
The 3 others (Bayern-München, Bayern-Landshut and Bayern-Ingolstadt)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria-Munich#mediaviewer/File:Bayern_nach_der_Teilung_1392.png
are all represented by "Bavaria" ingame.

The ruler Bavaria starts with "Ernst" is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest,_Duke_of_Bavaria
the Duke of Bavaria-Munich/Bayern-München. Ernst and the other two dukes within "Bavaria" were not on good terms. Between 1420 and 1422 there was open warfare. German WIKI, as I found nothing about the bavarian war on the english site:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayerischer_Krieg_(1420–1422)

I suggest to reduce both national cores to claimcores to represent that Bavaria-Munich only ruled 1/3rd of the area that it has ingame:

Change to 1419_BAY-Bavaria.inc:

Code:
[COLOR=red]nationalprovinces = {
        349 869
    }[/COLOR]
[COLOR=yellow]claimedprovinces = {
                349 869
    }[/COLOR]
...
technology = {
        stability = { level = [COLOR=red]3[/COLOR][COLOR=yellow]2[/COLOR] value = 0 }
        infra = { level = 1 value = 50 }
        trade = { level = 1 value = 50 }
        land = { level = 1 value = 0 }
        naval = { level = 1 value = 0 }
    }

and to 1419_Provinces_Misc.inc:

Code:
[COLOR=yellow]province = { id = 349 nationalism = { year = 1419 month = january day = 1 } } #Bavaria-Landshut
province = { id = 869 nationalism = { year = 1440 month = january day = 1 } } #Bavaria-Ingolstadt[/COLOR]
Alternatively we could create a new country for Bavaria-Landshut. That way three of the four 'Bavarias' would be represented.
 
Was this part of Lower Austria still Bohemian/Czech by 1419?

No. More likely mixed so the event does not mean that all bohemians there are suddenly bavarians, but more like that the majority has become bavarian since the province moved from Bohemia to the Habsburgs.
Furthermore while the battle of Marchfeld took place at the northeasternmost parts within Lower Austria historically, ingame Lower Austria/Niederösterreich and Marchfeld are two different provinces.

But in any case a reference to the battle on the Marchfeld is 250 years newer than the reference to the Ostarrichi March and the name Marchfeld for the province offers that connection to be used instead of the original AGCEEP event about the provinces of "Ostmarch" there.

To be honest I don't like the German split (which I did myself) as it complicates things unnecessarily. IMO the culture in the Germanic lands of the Holy Roman Empire should simply be 'German'. 'Dutch' culture should only emerge when the Dutch achieve nationhood and Dutch language stops being considered like any other German dialect.

I agree with that. Howver in the current cultural setup the simple way is to give LUX bavarian in addition to dutch and franconian (which is in effect the same as they having "german" in the vanilla map AGCEEP).
 
Suggested changes to austrian/HAB events:

Code:
#(1419-1511) Recuperation of old claims
event = {
	id = 179029
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 388 data = HAB } #Bern
			owned = { province = 1612 data = HAB } #Schwyz
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = HAB
	name = "EVENTNAME179029" #Recovery of Habsburg possessions
	desc = "EVENTHIST179029"
	#-#The Habsburg possessions located in today's Switzerland were historically lost to the Swiss in 1415 (Aargau with the castle that gave them their name), 1452 the County of Kyburg had to be finally sold to Zürich, Thurgau was lost in 1460 during Sigismund of Tyrols excommunication, the city of Winterthur 1467, and were too small and poor to precipitate serious problems or to face the always increasing power of the Swiss confederation. The Habsburgs were much more concerned about their chances to expand their rule in Austria, become emperor or King of Bohemia and Hungary. But if there had been a chance to assert their claim, it is very probable that it would have been used.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 7 month = february year = 1511 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME179029A" #We concentrate on Austria
		command = { type = independence which = HEL }
		command = { type = [color=red]se[/color]cedeprovince which = HEL value = 1612 } #Schwyz
		command = { type = [color=red]se[/color]cedeprovince which = HEL value = 388} #Bern
		command = { type = relation which = HEL value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 10 }
		command = { type = relation which = BUR value = 10 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 10 }
		command = { type = badboy value = -4 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME179029B" #Reclaim our ancestral lands
		command = { type = addcore[color=yellow]_claim[/color] which = 1612 } #Schwyz
		command = { type = addcore[color=yellow]_claim[/color] which = 388 } #Bern
		command = { type = relation which = HEL value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = BUR value = -10 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 179072 } #HAB: Swiss asking for independence
	}
}

#(1419-1513) Extermination of the Old Swiss Confederation - Ahistorical
event = {
	id = 179063
	trigger = {
		core = { province = 388 data = -1 } #should be only Burgundy-Lotharingia and Austria
		emperor = yes #only a powerful Austria should be able
		countrysize = 6 #to get away with this
		owned = { province = 388 data = HAB } #Bern
		owned = { province = 1612 data = HAB } #Schwyz
		control = { province = 388 data = HAB } #Bern
		control = { province = 1612 data = HAB } #Schwyz
		NOT = { exists = HEL }
		NOT = { exists = TYR } #Tyrol has the claims on Switzerland - only when Tyrol is gone can HAB/Austria mess around there
		NOT = { event = 20307 } #must be before Swiss get more non-german cantons
	}
	random = no
	country = HAB
	name = "EVENTNAME179063" #The fate of the Old Swiss Confederation
	desc = "EVENTHIST179063"
	#-#For years the house of Habsburg and the rebellious peasants that dared to form the Swiss Confederation in defiance of our overlordship over their lands, have been struggling against each other. Now we are in a position to dictate what should happen in the lands that are again and forever ours.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1513 } #must be before Switzerland gains more non-german cantons

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME179063A" #Gracefully allow them to keep their identity
		command = { type = independence which = HEL }
		command = { type = [color=red]se[/color]cedeprovince which = HEL value = 1612 } #Schwyz
		command = { type = [color=red]se[/color]cedeprovince which = HEL value = 388} #Bern
		command = { type = relation which = HEL value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = 10 }
		command = { type = relation which = BUR value = 10 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 10 }
		command = { type = badboy value = -4 }
		command = { type = stability value = 1 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME179063B" #Replace the administration with germans
		command = { type = provinceculture which = 388 value = [color=red]german[/color][color=yellow]Swabian[/color] } #Bern
		command = { type = provinceculture which = 1612 value = [color=red]german[/color][color=yellow]Swabian[/color]} #Schwyz
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = BUR value = -50 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 388 } #Bern
		command = { type = revolt which = 1612 } #Schwyz
	}
}
 
Suggested correction to Styria/STY events. As in Plus Vltra "Salzburg" is an existing state again, the lines that were marked as comments can be put back in:

Code:
#(1463) Austria inherits Styria
event = {
	id = 261000
	trigger = {
		exists = HAB
		exists = TYR
		NOT = { event = 261001 } #STY: Death of Duke Albert
	}
	random = no
	country = STY
	name = "EVENTNAME261000" #Death of Duke Albert
	desc = "EVENTHIST261000"
	#-#In december 1463 Duke Albert of Styria died childlessly. Despite their former conflicts, he let his brother, Emperor Friedrich III. inherit all his possessions.

	date = { day = 1 month = december year = 1463 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1464 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME261000A" #The duke's brother is heir (End Game)
		[color=red]#[/color]command = { type = independence which = SLZ } #Salzburg
		command = { type = independence which = BAY }
		command = { type = independence which = WUR }
		command = { type = independence which = MLO }
		command = { type = independence which = MAN }
		command = { type = independence which = VEN } #Weird things can happen :-)
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = VEN value = 368 } #Istria
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = VEN value = 365 } #Dalmatia
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 352 } #Odenburg
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 326 } #Presburg
		command = { type = trigger which = 179002 } #HAB: Austria inherits Styria
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME261000B" #Let Sigmund of Tyrol have it instead (End Game)
		command = { type = trigger which = 322014 } #TYR: Styria and Krain are willed to Tyrol
	}
	action_c = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME261000C" #Friedrich is our enemy! Styria remains independent
		command = { type = stability value = -3 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 367 } #Krain
		command = { type = revolt which = 369 } #Steiermark
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = -200 }
		command = { type = relation which = TYR value = -100 }
		[color=red]#[/color]command = { type = relation which = SLZ value = -100 } #Salzburg
	}
}
#(1463) Austria inherits Styria (Tyrol doesn't exist)
event = {
	id = 261001
	trigger = {
		exists = HAB
		NOT = {
			exists = TYR
			event = 261000 #STY: Death of Duke Albert
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = STY
	name = "EVENTNAME261000" #Death of Duke Albert
	desc = "EVENTHIST261000"
	#-#In december 1463 Duke Albert of Styria died childlessly. Despite their former conflicts, he let his brother, Emperor Friedrich III. inherit all his possessions.

	date = { day = 1 month = december year = 1463 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1464 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME261000A" #The duke's brother is heir (End Game)
		[color=red]#[/color]command = { type = independence which = SLZ } #Salzburg
		command = { type = independence which = TYR }
		command = { type = independence which = BAY }
		command = { type = independence which = WUR }
		command = { type = independence which = MLO }
		command = { type = independence which = MAN }
		command = { type = independence which = VEN } #Weird things can happen :-)
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = VEN value = 368 } #Istria
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = VEN value = 365 } #Dalmatia
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 352 } #Odenburg
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 326 } #Presburg
		command = { type = trigger which = 179002 } #HAB: Austria inherits Styria
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME261000C" #Friedrich is our enemy! Styria remains independent
		command = { type = stability value = -3 }
		command = { type = revolt which = 367 } #Krain
		command = { type = revolt which = 369 } #Steiermark
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = -200 }
		[color=red]#[/color]command = { type = relation which = SLZ value = -100 } #Salzburg
	}
}
 
Styria during the Cilli regency:


In event STY 261013 the regent Friedrich IV (of Tyrol) is exchanged against Hermann II of Cilli and cores are added because of the Cilli possessions.

Problems:
1) When those cores are added to Styria during the regency of Hermann II of Cilli in this event, then why are they not added in events STY 261010 B (ahistorical choice to have Hermann II of Cilli early) and STY261011 (STY and TYR at war)? I suggest that Cilli cores are added in all 3 events.

2) The cores given are nationalcores. However the Cilli lands were not undisputed property of a sovereign Cilli state but part of Croatia (and so of Hungary) and did not cover the entire province.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_Cilli
Hermann II of cilli was named heir presumptive of Turko of Bosnia to rule Bosnia after his death but never actually ruled it despite having that title - and even Turko did not rule Bosnia undisputed but had several opponents who wanted the throne of Bosnia.

I suggest to give only claimcores instead of nationalcores.

3) Hermann II of Cilli was not a ban of Croatia but of Slavonia. In the vanilla map there was only Croatia but now we have Slavonia too (1952) so a claimcore for Slavonia should be added too.

4) Those cores are never removed. As Styria usually is annexed by Austria in 1463 normally that is no problem. But if Styria is player controlled and chooses to stay independant it won´t ever lose the Cilli cores - even if after Hermann II. of Cilli the normal Habsburg regents take over..,

Either the cilli cores need to be removed when Friedrich V. of Habsburg takes over Styria or we need an event in which the player decides to go the Cilli way completely and the next Habsburg Styria regent is slept and Cilli´s son takes over after him and then after Ulrich II of Cilli in 1456 the styrian Habsburgs would take over again with Friedrich V. only 20 years later than historical.

Code:
#(1425-1439) Change of regent
event = {
	id = 261013
	trigger = {
		exists = TYR
		monarch = 0111018 #Friedrich IV
		NOT = { vassal = { country = STY country = TYR } }
	}
	random = no
	country = STY
	name = "EVENTNAME261013" #Change of regent
	desc = "EVENTHIST261013"
	#-#Unsatisfied with Friedrich IV's handling of matters in Styria, the estates of Inner Austria decided to entrust the regency into the hands of the Counts of Cilli. In 1437, Emperor Siegmund of Luxembourg, elevated the Counts of Cilli to State Princes. Since Hermann II was the son of Hermann I, Count of Cilli, and his wife was Katerina of Bosnia. The title of Lord of Bosnia was entrusted to the counts of Styria.

	date = { day = 0 month = january year = 1425 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { day = 23 month = june year = 1439 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME261013A" #We prefer Herman of Cilli
		command = { type = relation which = TYR value = -200 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = -200 }
		command = { type = relation which = HUN value = 200 } #Friend of emperor Sigismund, King of HUN and BOH
		command = { type = relation which = BOH value = 200 }
		command = { type = relation which = ROM value = 200 }
		command = { type = addcore_national which = 364 } #Bosnia
		command = { type = addcore_national which = 366 } #Croatia
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 0111017 } #Hermann II von Cilli
		command = { type = stability value = 3 }
	}
}
 
As this thread
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum...-WATKABAOI&p=13243754&viewfull=1#post13243754
is closed I´ll reply here:

Any idea why Straubing is owned by Luxembourg at the start? The Wittelsbach line of Straubing is the one that ruled Hainaut and Holland, not Luxembourg. Additionally, are there any sources about Straubing being momentarily granted to Austria?

Yes, you are right it was Bavaria-Straubing which ruled Hainault, Holland, Zeeland and Straubing:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavar...varia-Straubing_-_Karte_Straubing-Holland.png

However in 1419 Bavaria-Straubing was in a civil war and practically did not exist. Part of it was occupied by Brabant (as the husband of the heiresss of the last Duke of Bavaria-Straubing Jaqueline of Hainault) and Jan the Pitiless
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_III,_Duke_of_Bavaria-Straubing

As Jan III/John III was the husband of Elisabeth of Görlitz (who rules Luxemburg) that war was simulated by a Brabant-Luxemburg war in 1419 in AGCEEP and LUX having the cores that Jan III (as ruler of Bavaria-Straubing) tried to conquer and Bavaria-Straubing was left out of the game as a seperate state by AGCEEP in EU2 among other reasons for the lack of tags.

In AGCEEP LUX did have a core on Artois because on the vanilla map there was no Hainault so Artois had to double as Hainault for LUX.
As in the PV map Hainault does exist I suggest to change the starting cores of Lux:

Code:
ownedprovinces = {
		377 928 [color=yellow]#Luxemburg and Straubing[/color]
	}
	controlledprovinces = {
		377 339 [color=yellow]#Holland[/color]
                928
	}
	nationalprovinces = {
		377 339 [color=red]379[/color] 928 
	}
        [color=yellow]claimedprovinces = {
		340 #Zeeland
               1924 #Hainault
	}[/color]

Edit: About sources of Austria and Straubing: The german WIKI has a bit more info than the english one
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preßburger_Schiedsspruch
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayern-Ingolstadt#Straubinger_Erbfall
Basically Straubing was a mess. After the death of John III. of Bavaria-Straubing the male line of Bavaria-Straubing was extinct and the fief fell back to the Emperor to decide what to do.

In 1426 the other Bavarian Dukes met to discuss what to do with Straubing. Ludwig the bearded (of Bayern-Ingolstadt the smallest of the bavarian Duchys)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Bayern_nach_der_Teilung_1392.png
wanted Straubing completely for himself with the reason that he was the eldest bavarian Duke.
Heinrich the rich (of Bayern-Landshut) suggested to divide Straubing by 3 and give Bayern-München, Bayern-Landshut and Bayern-Ingolstadt 1/3rd each.
Bayern-München was ruled jointly by two dukes (Ernst and Wilhelm) so they suggested to divide Straubing by heads so that Bayern-München would get 2/4th and Landshut and Ingolstadt 1/4 each.
As they could not agree Sigismund of Luxemburg in March 1426 as a first step named the possible heirs as Heinrich, Ernst, Wilhelm *and suddenly Albrecht of Habsburg* (because Albrechts mother was a daughter of a former duke of Bavaria-Straubing). Ludwig was excluded in that list because he was excommunicated for quarreling with the others who united in the league of Constance
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstanzer_Liga
against Ludwig. The leage tried to mediate and suggest a partition into 3 parts after negotiating for months. In october Ludwig suddenly was back in the list of heirs because his excommunication had been lifted. Then the league delegated the decision to the "Landstände" of Straubing itself, who did not want to and gave the decision back to the Emperor...
And Sigismund needed until 1429 to finally decide to partition it in 4 quarters of which 2/4th went to Bayern-München and B.-Ingolstadt and B.-Landshut got 1/4 each.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Das_Straubinger_Erbe.png

Historically Austria got nothing. However my guess would be that Austria gets Straubing because Albrecht was a possible heir and someone had to own it until the 1429 decision.

Therion said:
Alternatively we could create a new country for Bavaria-Landshut. That way three of the four 'Bavarias' would be represented.

As one-province minors each one would be at risk to vanish ahistorically early compared to the 2 province Bavaria currently in the game. It´s possible but then each bavarian duchy would need an event to become the surviving united Bavaria.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/timeline/a13c8f00effd7015073dcb1f308ccc7d.png
 
Last edited:
Suggested changes to the LUXemburg event file:

The WAR command should be avoided in most cases unless it´s used to force a historical war that is unlikely to happen otherwise. Here it´s used in the ahistorical b choice so it should go:

Code:
#(1420) Jan and the Schieringers -1-
event = {
	id = 213003
	trigger = {
		control = { province = 339 data = -1 } #Holland
		exists = FRI
	}
	random = no
	country = LUX
	name = "EVENTNAME213003" #Schieringers request aid
	desc = "EVENTHIST213003"
	#-#From 1392 to 1498, civil war between two parties, the Schieringers and the Vetkopers raged in Friesland. In june 1420, the Schieringers asked Jan of Bavaria to aid them in their civil war against the Vetkopers, Jan was too busy with internal affairs.

	date = { day = 15 month = june year = 1420 }
	offset = 14
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = july year = 1420 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213003A" #No thanks, too busy
		command = { type = trigger which = 22011 } #FRI: Reconciliation effort of the Schieringers
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213003B" #With pleasure
		command = { type = addcore[color=yellow]_claim[/color] which = 337 } #Friesen
		[color=red]command = { type = war which = FRI }[/color]
		command = { type = stability value = -2 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 22012 } #FRI: Vetkoper reaction to the Schieringer pact with Jan VI
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 213004 } #LUX: Jan and the Schieringers
	}
}

In 213005b provincial revoltrisk is added. As I suggest to give LUX only a claimcore it already will have 3% nationalism so it´s sufficient to add +22% RR instead of +25:

Code:
#(1420) Jan and the Schieringers -2-
event = {
	id = 213004
	trigger = {
		control = { province = 339 data = -1 } #Holland
		exists = FRI
	}
	random = no
	country = LUX
	name = "EVENTNAME213004" #Jan and the Schieringers
	desc = "EVENTHIST213004"
	#-#Despite their previous reconciliation effort, the Schieringers came to Jan once more, this time Jan accepted and became lord over Friesland.

	date = { day = 4 month = october year = 1420 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 4 month = november year = 1420 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213004A" #A great oppurtunity
		command = { type = addcore[color=yellow]_claim[/color] which = 337 } #Friesen
		command = { type = war which = FRI }
		command = { type = trigger which = 22012 } #FRI: Vetkoper reaction to the Schieringer pact with Jan VI
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213004B" #We have no interest in Friesland
		command = { type = relation which = FRI value = 50 }
	}
}


#(1422) Jan loses control of the Schieringers -I-
event = {
	id = 213005
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 337 data = -1 } #Friesen
	}
	random = no
	country = LUX
	name = "EVENTNAME213005" #Jan loses control of the Schieringers
	desc = "EVENTHIST213005"
	#-#After stepping on the Shieringers' toes once too many, Jan lost control of the Schieringers. After losing Dokkum, his last foothold in Friesland, on the 29th of May 1422, the treaty ending his Frisian adventure was signed on the 17th of August.

	date = { day = 16 month = august year = 1422 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213005A" #Let go of Friesland
		command = { type = independence which = FRI }
		command = { type = removecore[color=yellow]_national[/color] which = 337 } #Friesen
		command = { type = trigger which = 22015 } #FRI: Jan loses control of the Schieringers
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 213006 } #LUX: Jan loses control of the Schieringers -II-
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213005B" #Crush the Frisian rebels
		command = { type = revolt which = 337 } #Friesen
		command = { type = revolt which = 337 } #Friesen
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 337 value = 2[color=red]5[/color][color=yellow]2[/color] } #Friesen
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 213006 } #LUX: Jan loses control of the Schieringers -II-
	}
}


#(1422) Jan loses control of the Schieringers -II-
event = {
	id = 213006
	trigger = {
		vassal = { country = LUX country = FRI }
	}
	random = no
	country = LUX
	name = "EVENTNAME213005" #Jan loses control of the Schieringers
	desc = "EVENTHIST213005"
	#-#After stepping on the Shieringers' toes once too many, Jan lost control of the Schieringers. After losing Dokkum, his last foothold in Friesland, on the 29th of May 1422, the treaty ending his Frisian adventure was signed on the 17th of August.

	date = { day = 16 month = august year = 1422 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213005A" #Let go of Friesland
		command = { type = removecore[color=yellow]_national[/color] which = 337 } #Friesen
		command = { type = trigger which = 22015 } #FRI: Jan loses control of the Schieringers
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 213005 } #LUX: Jan loses control of the Schieringers -I-
	}
}

Change from Artois (379) to Hainault (1924) province ID. As only a claimcore is given LUX will have 3% nationalism so instead of 8% Revoltrisk I suggest to add only 5% provincial RR:

Code:
#(1424) Jacqueline's invasion of Hainault
event = {
	id = 213000
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color] data = -1 } #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
	}
	random = no
	country = LUX
	name = "EVENTNAME213000" #The Countess of Hainault and the Duke of Gloucester
	desc = "EVENTHIST213000"
	#-#Jacqueline, daughter of Wilhelm, the last Count of Holland, Hainault and Zeeland, and rightful heiress to his possessions, was deprived of her inheritance by her uncle Jan of Bavaria and her husband Jan IV of Brabant. In an angry reaction, she declared her marriage invalid, fled to England and there fell in love with Humphrey of Gloucester, brother of the King, whom, after obtaining a dispens from the Antipope, she married and declared her coregent. With an English army, the couple on October 26th crossed the channel, landed in Calais and invaded Hainault. They managed to take control of most of the county. The Duke of Burgundy offers us support against the impertinent niece of Jan of Bavaria, pawnee of Luxemburg.

	date = { day = 26 month = october year = 1424 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213000A" #Beat her back with Burgundian help
		command = { type = revolt which =  [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = revolt which =  [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which =  [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]value = [color=red]8[/color][color=yellow]5[/color] } #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = INF which = -2 value = 6000 }
		command = { type = CAV which = -2 value = 3000 }
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = -100 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 137010 } #BUR: Support for Jan of Bavaria
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213000B" #Fight her alone
		command = { type = revolt which = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = revolt which = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]value =  [color=red]8[/color][color=yellow]5[/color] } #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = relation which = ENG value = -100 }
	}
}
 
Last edited:
Exchanging Hainault for Artois and adding Zeeland:

Code:
#(1425) Death of Jan the Merciless -I-
event = {
	id = 213001
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 339 data = -1 } #Holland
			owned = { province = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color] data = -1 } #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault
                        owned = { province = 938 data = -1 } #Zeeland [/color]
		}
		exists = BUR
	}
	random = no
	country = LUX
	name = "EVENTNAME213001" #Death of Jan the Merciless
	desc = "EVENTHIST213001"
	#-#Jan of Bavaria, husband of Elisabeth of Görlitz and as such pawnee of Luxemburg, died, probably of poison, on January 6th 1425. While his wife retained her pawn Luxemburg, the Duchy of Bavaria-Straubing was seized by Emperor Sigismund as a vacant Imperial fief and his part of the Dutch Wittelsbach inheritance passed to Burgundy, on the base of a treaty that had just been concluded, which is why the Duke of Burgundy was immediately suspected of having ordered the assassination of Jan.

	date = { day = 5 month = january year = 1425 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213001A" #Honour the agreement with Burgundy
		[color=red]command = { 
				trigger = { 
					NOT = { exists = HAU }
				}
				type = cedeprovince which = BUR value = 339 #Holland
		}[/color]
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HAU value = 339 } #Holland
                [color=yellow]command = { type = cedeprovince which = BUR value = 339 #Holland only works if HAU does not receive 339 before
                command = { type = cedeprovince which = BUR value = 938 } #Zeeland[/color]
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = BUR value = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 928 } #Straubing
		command = { type = independence which = FRI }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = FRI }
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 339 } #Holland
		command = { type = removecore_national which = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 928 } #Straubing
                [color=yellow]command = { type = removecore_national which = 938 } #Zeeland[/color]
		command = { type = remove_countryculture which = dutch }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 213002 } #LUX: Death of Jan the Merciless -II-
		command = { type = trigger which = 137026 } #BUR: The Dutch Wittelsbach possessions
		command = { type = trigger which = 182004 } #HAU: The Dutch Wittelsbach possessions
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213001B" #Don't turn over anything to the murderers of my husband!
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 928 } #Straubing
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 928 } #Straubing
		command = { type = war which = BUR }
		command = { type = stability value = -3 }
		command = { type = remove_countryculture which = dutch }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 213002 } #LUX: Death of Jan the Merciless -II-
		command = { type = trigger which = 137027 } #BUR: The Dutch Wittelsbach possessions
	}
}
#(1425) Death of Jan the Merciless -II-
event = {
	id = 213002
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			NOT = {
				owned = { province = 339 data = -1 } #Holland
				owned = { province = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
			}
			NOT = {
				exists = BUR
			}
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = LUX
	name = "EVENTNAME213001" #Death of Jan the Merciless
	desc = "EVENTHIST213002"
	#-#Jan of Bavaria, husband of Elisabeth of Görlitz and as such pawnee of Luxemburg, died, probably of poison, on January 6th 1425. While his wife retained her pawn Luxemburg, the Duchy of Bavaria-Straubing was seized by Emperor Sigismund as a vacant Imperial fief.

	date = { day = 5 month = january year = 1425 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME213002A" #My dear husband
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HAU value = 339 } #Holland
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HAU value = [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 928 } #Straubing
                [color=yellow]command = { type = cedeprovince which = BUR value = 938 } #Zeeland
                command = { type = removecore_national which = 938 } #Zeeland[/color]
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 339 } #Holland
		command = { type = removecore_national which =  [color=red]379[/color][color=yellow]1924[/color]} #[color=red]Artois[/color][color=yellow]Hainault[/color]
		command = { type = removecore_national which = 928 } #Straubing
		command = { type = remove_countryculture which = dutch }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 213001 } #LUX: Death of Jan the Merciless -I-
		command = { 
			trigger = { 
				OR = {
					owned = { province = 339 data = -1 } #Holland
					owned = { province = 1924 data = -1 } #Hainaut
                                        [color=yellow]owned = { province = 938 data = -1 } #Zeeland[/color]
				}
			}
			type = trigger which = 182005  #HAU: The Dutch Wittelsbach possessions
		}
	}
}

Edit: I attached the LUX event file with the changes I described above if noone obects to them.

View attachment AGCEEP_Specific_Luxemburg.zip
 
Last edited:
Change to the sequence about Sigismund of Tyrol mortgaging Alsace and Breisgau to Burgundy.
In AGCEEP on the vanilla map neither Breisgau nor Sundgau had it´s own province so both were represented by the Baden province. However Plus Vltra does have Breisgau as it´s own province.

Change to AGCEEP_Specific_Tyrol.eue

Code:
#(1469) Alsace mortgaged to Burgundy
event = {
	id = 322005
	trigger = {
		exists = BUR
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 374 data = -1 } #Alsace
			owned = { province = [color=red]373[/color][color=yellow]1930[/color] data = -1 } #[color=red]Baden[/color][color=yellow]Breisgau[/color]
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = TYR
	name = "EVENTNAME322005" #Problems in the Vorlande
	desc = "EVENTHIST137001"
	#-#Sigismund of Tyrol ruled the Vorlande, the Habsburg possessions north of the Alps, in Alsace and Breisgau, very ineffectively. Most of the local nobility operated as robber barons, there was virtually no tax collection and the Swiss neighbours in the south occasionally sent pillaging troops in and tried to expand into these territories. One such border war with Helvetia in 1468 was concluded by Sigismund promising to pay 10000 Guldens. Since he was always in financial trouble, he soon searched for someone to grant him a credit. After the Emperor's and the French King's refusal, the only likely creditor was Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. When on March 21st 1469 the two princes met in Arras, they negotiated an even more far-reaching agreement: Sigismund saw Burgundy as a potentially useful ally against the Helvetian threat, and in order to tie him closely to Tyrol, he offered him to mortgage the Vorlande for an amount of 50000 Guldens. To rebuy the provinces, Tyrol would have had to pay back not only this sum, but also all expenses Burgundy would make for the establishment of an administration, which seemed practically impossible for the struggling Count. Hence by the treaty of St. Omer signed in May Sigismund sold the Vorlande to Burgundy in exchange for the money he badly needed and Burgundian support against his Helvetian enemies. Only due to Charles' premature death in battle the vorlande were returned to Tyrol.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1469 }
	offset = 200
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1469 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME322005A" #Offer Alsace to Burgundy
		command = { type = trigger which = 137001 } #BUR: The Treaty of St.Omer
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME322005B" #Don't negotiate with Charles the Bold
		command = { type = relation which = BUR value = -50 }
		command = { type = treasury value = -30 } #They have to pay Helvetia themselves
	}
}
#(1469) Burgundy accepts
event = {
	id = 322006 #triggered by BUR_137001 A
	random = no
	country = TYR
	name = "EVENTNAME322006" #Burgundy accepts
	desc = "EVENTHIST322006"
	#-#Charles the Bold of Burgundy has accepted our offer. Alsace, Breisgau, Sundgau and the Rhenanian cities will be mortgaged to Burgundy for 50000 Guldens.

	action_a = {
		name = "OK"
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = BUR value = 374 } #Alsace
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = BUR value = [color=red]373[/color][color=yellow]1930[/color] } #[color=red]Baden[/color][color=yellow]Breisgau[/color]
		command = { type = treasury value = 70 }
	}
}

Changes to AGCEEP_Specific_Burgundy.eue

Code:
#(1469) Treaty of St. Omer (Purchase of Alsace)
event = {
	id = 137001 #triggered by TYR_322005 A
	random = no
	country = BUR
	name = "EVENTNAME137001" #The Treaty of St. Omer
	desc = "EVENTHIST137001"
	#-#Sigismund of Tyrol ruled the Vorlande, the Habsburg possessions north of the Alps, in Alsace and Breisgau, very ineffectively. Most of the local nobility operated as robber barons, there was virtually no tax collection and the Swiss neighbours in the south occasionally sent pillaging troops in and tried to expand into these territories. One such border war with Helvetia in 1468 was concluded by Sigismund promising to pay 10000 Guldens. Since he was always in financial trouble, he soon searched for someone to grant him a credit. After the Emperor's and the French King's refusal, the only likely creditor was Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy. When on March 21st 1469 the two princes met in Arras, they negotiated an even more far-reaching agreement: Sigismund saw Burgundy as a potentially useful ally against the Helvetian threat, and in order to tie him closely to Tyrol, he offered him to mortgage the Vorlande for an amount of 50000 Guldens. To rebuy the provinces, Tyrol would have had to pay back not only this sum, but also all expenses Burgundy would make for the establishment of an administration, which seemed practically impossible for the struggling Count. Hence by the treaty of St. Omer signed in May Sigismund sold the Vorlande to Burgundy in exchange for the money he badly needed and Burgundian support against his Helvetian enemies. Only due to Charles' premature death in battle the vorlande were returned to Tyrol.

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME137001A" #Buy the Habsburg Vorlande
		command = { type = addcore_[color=red]national[/color][color=yellow]_claim[/color] which = 374 } #Alsace to be changed to new Sundgau province as soon as new map appears
		command = { type = treasury value = -130 }
		command = { type = relation which = TYR value = 100 }
		command = { type = relation which = HEL value = -100 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 322006 } #TYR: Burgundy accepts
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME137001B" #Refuse to help Sigismund
		command = { type = relation which = TYR value = -50 }
	}
}

#(1482-1486) Sigismund of Tyrol renounces claim on Vorlande - Ahistorical
event = {
	id = 137076 #triggered by TYR_322028 A
	random = no
	country = BUR
	name = "EVENTNAME137076" #Sigismund of Tyrol renounces claim on Vorlande
	desc = "EVENTHIST137076"
	#-#As the new dynasty started settling into Brussels, it was time to determine the final fate of Vorlande. As expected, Sigismund was in no way capable of paying enough to get his lands back, and Vorlande was made part of Burgundy with his consent.

	action_a = {
		name = "GREAT"
		command = { type = addcore_national which = [color=red]373[/color][color=yellow]1930[/color] } #[color=red]Baden[/color]
		command = { type = addcore_national which = 374 } #Alsace to be changed to new Sundgau province as soon as new map appears
	}
}
#(1482-1486) Sigismund of Tyrol reclaims Vorlande - Ahistorical
event = {
	id = 137077 #triggered by TYR_322028 B
	random = no
	country = BUR
	name = "EVENTNAME137077" #Sigismund of Tyrol reclaims Vorlande
	desc = "EVENTHIST137077"
	#-#As the new dynasty started settling into Brussels, they were surprised by that Sigismund of Tyrol was able to offer enough gold to rebuy the lands he sold to Charles the Bold.

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME137077A" #We have no choice
		command = { type = treasury value = 200 }
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = TYR value = [color=red]373[/color][color=yellow]1930[/color] } #[color=red]Baden[/color]
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = TYR value = 374 } #Alsace to be changed to new Sundgau province as soon as new map appears
	}
}

#(1487-1820) Habsburgs reclaim Vorlande - Ahistorical
event = {
	id = 137078 #triggered by HAB_179153 A
	random = no
	country = BUR
	name = "EVENTNAME137078" #Habsburgs reclaim Vorlande
	desc = "EVENTHIST137078"
	#-#As the new dynasty started settling into Brussels, an offer came from Austrian successors of Sigismund of Tyrol to reclaim the lands he mortgaged to Charles the Bold.

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME137077A" #We have no choice
		command = { type = treasury value = 200 }
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HAB value = [color=red]373[/color][color=yellow]1930[/color] } #[color=red]Baden[/color]
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HAB value = 374 } #Alsace to be changed to new Sundgau province as soon as new map appears
	}
}
#(1487-1820) Habsburgs renounce claim on Vorlande - Ahistorical
event = {
	id = 137079 #triggered by HAB_179153 B
	random = no
	country = BUR
	name = "EVENTNAME137079" #Habsburgs renounce claim on Vorlande
	desc = "EVENTHIST137079"
	#-#Sigismund of Tyrol failed to settle the issue of Vorlande with the new Burgindian dinasty before he was succeeded by the Austrian branch of Habsburgs. Since they can't afford to rebuy the lands either, Vorlande can now be incorporated into our realm with their consent.

	action_a = {
		name = "GREAT"
		command = { type = addcore_national which = [color=red]373[/color][color=yellow]1930[/color] } #[color=red]Baden[/color]
		command = { type = addcore_national which = 374 } #Alsace to be changed to new Sundgau province as soon as new map appears
	}
}
 
Last edited:
Following the suggested changes for the Aquileia cores for VENice I suggest that Austria gains a core on the province of Aquileia around 1500.
At that time the Habsburgs historically inherited the County of Görz that included the city of Aquileia.

I suggest to add that command:

command = { type = addcore_claim which = 1423 } #Aquilea/Görz

to the choice a in events HAB 17021. 17022 and 3182.

Those events are about the leage of Cambrai against Venice and fit both in purpose (against VEN) and time (around 1500).
 
Suggested changes to the Cleves/Kleve event file
AGCEEP_Specific_Cleves.eue

As Magdeburg and Salzburg exist as states in Plus Vltra the lines that were commented out with # can be used again. Having good relations with the Pope is a good trigger for that event but not being at war seems to be more important to me:

Code:
#(1489) Johann II is awarded the Golden Rose
event = {
	id = 200005
	trigger = {
		relation = { country = PAP data = 50 }
                [color=yellow]NOT = { war = { country = KLE country = PAP } }[/color]
	}
	random = no
	country = KLE
	name = "EVENTNAME200005" #Johann II is awarded the Golden Rose
	desc = "EVENTHIST200005"
	#-#Although he did not think too highly of chastity, Duke Johann II received the surname the Pious, certainly not because of his character, but due to his favourable politic regarding the church, granting them a lot of privileges and advantages. As a reward, he was awarded the Golden Rose by Pope Innocentius VIII in 1489.

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1489 }
	offset = 300
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1489 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME200005A" #Thank you, your holiness
		command = { type = relation which = PAP value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = MAI value = 30 }
		#command = { type = relation which = THU value = 30 } #Bayreuth
		command = { type = relation which = MUN value = 30 }
		command = { type = relation which = BRE value = 30 }
		[color=red]#[/color]command = { type = relation which = MAG value = 30 } #Magdeburg
		[color=red]#[/color]command = { type = relation which = SLZ value = 30 } #Salzburg
		command = { type = vp value = 5 }
	}
}

This event still uses the MUN tag from AGCEEP but in Plus Vltra the Duchy of Berg is BRG so currently Cleves inherits the wrong state.
That the duchy to be inherited exists should not be checked in the trigger in my opinion. Cleves needs the event to gain the core as it historically inherited. If Berg would have been conquered by someone else then Cleves would still be the rightful heir that needs it´s core.
As Berg represents the Duchy of "Jülich-Berg" and Jülich has it´s own tag that for whatever reason might still exist I suggest to add that to the inheritance too.

Code:
#(1521) The united Duchies
event = {
	id = 200006
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			ai = no
			AND = {
				ai = yes
				OR = {
					event = 235002
					event = 235003
					event = 235004
				}
			}
		}
		[color=red]exists = MUN[/color]
	}
	random = no
	country = KLE
	name = "EVENTNAME200006" #The united Duchies
	desc = "EVENTHIST200006"
	#-#It had always been a primary goal of the Dukes of Kleve and Mark to unite their possessions with the duchies of Berg and Jülich, thereby creating a coherent territorial state in the low rhine area. This union was realised in the early 16th century. It was prepared on November 25th 1496 when the estates of both countries and Duke Wilhelm IV of Jü[color=red]ü[/color]lich-Berg agreed to a marriage between the future Duke of Kleve, Johann, and Wilhelm's only child Maria. In 1510 the couple was finally married and succeeded in Jülich-Berg in 1511. The union was complete when Duke Johann of Kleve died in 1521 and Kleve, Mark, Berg, Jülich and Ravensberg had the same ruler in Johann.

	date = { day = 15 month = january year = 1521 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME200006A" #Unite the low rhine duchies
		command = { type = addcore_national which = [color=red]343[/color][color=yellow]848[/color] } #[color=red]Kleves[/color][color=yellow]Berg[/color]
		command = { type = inherit which = [color=red]MUN[/color][color=yellow]BRG[/color] }
  	        [color=yellow]command = { type = inherit which = JUL }
                command = { type = addcore_national which = 1435 } #Jülich
                command = { type = addcore_claim which = 338 } #Geldern[/color]
	}
}
 
Proposed HRE provinces. In yellow are dubious provinces whose inclusion depends upon their province size and the regional limit.

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Artois - Artesie/Artois - Arras
Brabant - Brabant - Brussels
Breda (?) - Breda (?) - Den Bosch/Breda
Flanders - Vlaanderen/Flandern - Bruges/Antwerp (port Ostend)
Frisia - Friesland - Leeuwarden/Groningen (port Harlingen)
Gelderland/Lower Guelders - Gelderland - Nijmegen/Arnhem (port Hardewijk)
Hainault - Hainaut - Mons
Holland - Holland - Amsterdam (port Amsterdam)
Lille - Lille/Rijsel - Lille (port Dunkirk)
Limburg /Guelders - Limburg/Gelre/Geldern - Maastricht/Roermond

Luxemburg - Luxemburg - Luxemburg
Overijssel - Overyssel - Deventer/Zwolle (port ?)
Utrecht - Utrecht - Utrecht
Zeeland - Zeeland - Middelburg (port Vlissingen)

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Berg - Berg - Düsseldorf
Cambrai/Cambray - Cambrai/Cambray - Valenciennes
Cleves - Cleve/Kleef - Cleves
East Frisia - Ostfriesland - Emden (port Emden)
Juliers - Gülich/Jülich - Juliers
Liege - Liege - Liege
Mark - Mark - Hamm/Soest

Münster - Münster - Münster
Oldenburg - Oldenburg - Oldenburg (port ?)

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Coblenz/Coblence - Coblenz - Coblenz
Cologne - Köln/Cöln - Bonn
Mentz/Mayence - Mainz - Mainz
Palatinate - Pfalz - Heidelberg/Mannheim
Rhine Palatinate - Rheinpfalz - Oppenheim
Trier/Treves - Trier - Trier/Coblenz
Westphalia - Westfalen - Soest/Arnsberg

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Alsace/Lower Alsace - Elsass/Nordgau- Strassburg
Bar - Bar - Bar-le-duc
Hesse/Lower Hesse - Hessen/Niederhessen - Cassel
Lorraine - Lorraine - Nancy
Metz/Three Bishoprics - Metz/Trois Eveches - Metz
Wetteravia/Upper Hesse - Wetterau/Oberhessen - Darmstadt/Marburg

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Bremen - Bremen - Vörde/Stade (port ?)
Brunswick - Braunschweig - Wolfenbüttel
Calenberg - Calenberg - Hannover
Holstein - Holstein - Kiel/Glückstadt (port Kiel/Glückstadt)
Lunenburg - Lüneburg - Lunenburg
Magdeburg - Magdeburg - Magdeburg
Mecklenburg - Mecklenburg - Schwerin (port Wismar)
Vandalia - Wenden - Guströw/Rostock (port Rostock)

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Farther Pomerania - Hinterpommern - Stargard/Colberg (port ?)
Hither Pomerania - Vorpommern - Stettin (port Stettin)
Middle Mark - Mittelmark - Berlin-Cölln
Misnia - Meissen - Dresden
New Mark - Neumark - Küstrin
Old Mark - Altmark - Tangermünde/Stendal
Osterland - Osterland - Leipzig
Rugia - Rügen - Stralsund (port Stralsund)
Saxony - Sachsen - Wittenberg
Thuringia - Thüringen - Weimar

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Upper Franconia - Oberfranken - Ansbach/Culmbach/Bayreuth
Lower Franconia - Unterfranken - Würzburg

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Augsburg - Augsburg - Augsburg/Dillingen
Baden - Baden - Baden/Karlsruhe
Wirtemberg - Wirtemberg - Stuttgart

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Lower Bavaria - Niederbayern - Straubing
Middle Bavaria - Mittelbayern - Landshut
Salzburg - Salzburg - Salzburg
Upper Bavaria - Oberbayern - Munich
Upper Palatinate - Oberpfalz - Amberg

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Breisgau - Breisgau - Freiburg
Carinthia - Kärnten/Cärnten - Clagenfurt (port Trieste)
Carniola - Krain/Crain - Laibach
Cilli/Lower Styria - Celje - Cilli
Gorizia - Görz - Gorizia

Lower Austria - Unter der Enns - Vienna
Styria - Steiermark - Graz
Sundgau/Upper Alsace - Sundgau - Ensisheim
Trent - Trento - Trent
Tyrol - Tirol - Innsbruck
Upper Austria - Ob der Enns - Linz
Vorarlberg - Vorarlberg - Bregenz

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Prachens (?) - Prachens (?) - Budweiss/Tabor
Bohemia - Cechy - Prague
Erz - Erz - Plzen
Lower Silesia - Niederschlesien - Breslau
Lusatia - Lausitz - Bautzen/Görlitz
Moravia - Morava - Olomouc/Brno
Sudetes - Sudeten - Königingrätz
Upper Silesia - Oberschlesien - Oppeln

Prov English - Prov Native - City
Basel/Aargau - Basel/Aargau - Basel
Bern - Bern/Oberland - Bern
Grisons - Graubünden - Chur
Schwyz - Schwyz/Waldstätte - Schwyz

Vaud - Vaud - Geneva
Valtelline/Ticino - Valtellina/Ticino/Tessin - Sondrio (?)
Zürich/Thurgau - Zürich/Thurgau - Zürich
 
Last edited:
  • 1
Reactions: