Lionheart v Crusaders: Thy Kingdom Come

[unmerged(183166)]

Greetings, I apologies if this has been covered before:

What is the biggest differences between this game and Crusaders: Thy Kingdom Come ?

Looking at the screenshots, it appears to have identical units and same style gameplay, with the only difference being a minor UI change, and having a strategical map, opposed to the 'Campaign Camp' in Crusaders. (Thus it looks like Crusaders ported Arthur's system)

 

[unmerged(183166)]

I take it there is no difference between the games then...

 

[tului]

I'm not sure, I just purchased Lionheart and the DLC and saw Crusaders as well. Not a huge RTS fan but it looked so delicious and reminded me of ages past playing Myth.

 

[unmerged(210943)]

I"ve been a fan of the Neocore games since Crusaders, absolutely love King Arthur, and am currently enjoying Lionheart. Crusaders was fun but Lionheart is the game that Crusaders was meant to be. Many more options to build an army of absolute butt-kickers! The battles are still based on being heavily outnumbered and you can't spare to lose soldiers. Many options to give various abilities and specialties to units. I've almost finished the campaign as the crusaders and am anxious to play as Saracens. Only minor complaints- the campaign seems a little short (could use some more side missions) and you spend a lot of time watching your army move across territory. All in all a great game, thanks to Neocore/Paradox for a good time!

 

[unmerged(165900)]

@gorpfelch: Could not have said it better myself, a good summary of the difference between Crusaders and Kings' Crusade!

/M