One of the complaints I always hear about EU3 was that colonial revolters stood no chance of ever actually forming and kicking Europe out of the Americas. I've only had so many chance to spectate my friends playtime after 1750, but I have dug through the files and saw that colonial rebels only get ONE army. They wound up in several wars against all of Europe at times (why THAT happened I'll never know)... with ONE army. I'm assuming that EU4 will use the US as the model revolter, considering the "founding fathers" bit. In that war, the US had numbers which actually overwhelmed the British (Militia, our regulars were not nearly so numerous) and that local numerical advantage and the logistics of an internalized line of supply was essentially how we beat them and their darn hessians. That was a laughable outcome in EU3 if the files are any indication of the norm.
Will EU4 fix that? Will colonial revolts be the very large, extremely hard to stop tides that they were in history, or will it be another "joke of a whack-a-mole" as they're called?
(PS I'm very mad at you, Paradox. I never preorder games on principle, prefering instead to read reviews, play them or at least watch friends play to be sure it's worth my $$$, but you foul temptors have swayed me and I just bought EU4 Extreme).
Will EU4 fix that? Will colonial revolts be the very large, extremely hard to stop tides that they were in history, or will it be another "joke of a whack-a-mole" as they're called?
(PS I'm very mad at you, Paradox. I never preorder games on principle, prefering instead to read reviews, play them or at least watch friends play to be sure it's worth my $$$, but you foul temptors have swayed me and I just bought EU4 Extreme).