I've noticed a minor bug, when playing as a High Tribal nation the government flavor says "Anarchy". Playing as Romano-Gallic culture, if that makes a difference.
[WtWSMS] Bug Reports/Technical Issues
- Thread starter loup99
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Yeah, at the moment it's... pretty terribly jarring, I have to say. Makes it really hard to read the map, too.
I am also having Beverages problem of showing an anarchy type, however I am playing as Romano-British with a Sub-Roman government type.
In addition during the bubonic plague, I got an event to banish the jews, and now am stuck with the 'expelled the jews' modifier. I don't know if this is a bug but a few other rulers have the same modifier, is there anyway to 'unexpel' the jews like in base game?
In addition during the bubonic plague, I got an event to banish the jews, and now am stuck with the 'expelled the jews' modifier. I don't know if this is a bug but a few other rulers have the same modifier, is there anyway to 'unexpel' the jews like in base game?
Last edited:
Usually it takes a number of years, or even a new ruler before you are able to invite the Jews back to your realm, at least that's how it works in the base game. I don't believe it's changed here.
I'm pretty sure in vanilla it shows you the option to reinvite the jews even if you can't exactly do that for a number of years. Unfortunately, I may likely be wrong and in that case this is not a bug.
Another bug is that when you try to integrate a Foederatus and they decline, and you try to declare war to integrate them, instead of actually declaring war, it doesn't declare war and in the notifications states that it ended inconclusively because the Casus Belli was no longer valid.
Noted, it is because the new governments don't have government flavours
Not something we modify.
Noted, will see if I can reproduce.
You can try to add this file to the WTWSMS\map folder to see if it resolves the issue: https://www.dropbox.com/s/76scekfzfnlpehu/rivers.bmp?dl=0
If you guys are intending on keeping the current province layout. Then you might want to include the rivers.bmp, topology.bmp, world_normal_height.bmp, colormap.dds, and colormap_water.dds form 2.7 or 2.8.
I usually tend to make Rome the capital because Ravenna as a county is not all that great. It just feels kind of annoying that whenever I grant out the province of Annonaria I end up having to revoke Ravenna and pay the 2k gold price to reform the fleet.
I mean the "latin solar" religion, which is extinct in all start dates but can be revived via secret cult. Right now it's almost exactly the same as the "african solar" religion, it uses the african_gfx I think, which turns the title shields on the map into african ones and that looks odd.
We will try to find an alternative solution since we have gotten several remarks on this.
Ok, I misunderstood you then, that is indeed an issue.
I'm pretty certain there aren't supposed to be any Sub-Roman Realms in Arabia at game-start..png){kind=avatar}
A funny thing with Defensive Pacts ON is that legions which aren't my vassals usually join against me, even if the ERE isn't on the pact. And since they are mercenaries, they all spawn on the capital of my target. It is a decent deterrent, but also gamey if what I want is to cripple the ERE...
Not sure if the mod is balanced with Defensive Pacts in mind, but I thought I'd mention it anyway
Not sure if the mod is balanced with Defensive Pacts in mind, but I thought I'd mention it anyway
On the note of High Tribal Government I noticed that in the first start date the government map says that most of the romano-brithon rulers use sub-roman government but after switching to other bookmarks and going back to first one those same realms become high tribal.
Starting as a Lombard (at the first start date they're all alive), the king's heir has a child that's only ten years apart, that'll mean the child was born when the heir was ten, which is improbable. Just make the father a three years older and the child three years younger, so the father can be 16 at the time of birth.
We will look into this.
Not meant to happen, noted.A funny thing with Defensive Pacts ON is that legions which aren't my vassals usually join against me, even if the ERE isn't on the pact. And since they are mercenaries, they all spawn on the capital of my target. It is a decent deterrent, but also gamey if what I want is to cripple the ERE...
Not sure if the mod is balanced with Defensive Pacts in mind, but I thought I'd mention it anyway
As was observed by another user, the river file alone is indeed not enough to fix the problem. I will have to upload some other files as well, will try to get hold of them later.
The character selection menu lies about governments. Due to the way they are attributed with scripted triggers and the government file they only fully load once you are playing. It switching in that menu has no incidence on the actual game, to my knowledge (if it does have an impact then it is an issue, but otherwise merely visual).
Noted.
A bugs report about tribal government:
1- There seems to be a bug with tribal organization and succession. Basically the tooltip says that non-existent to medium tribal organization in kingdoms put it at risk of imploding during succession. The problem is that even if you have high or absolute tribal organization, the tribal kingdom will always explode which is very frustrating especially if you can't change from tribalism.
2- Also, regarding tribal kingdoms explosion, there should be something to tell you what is exactly a "worthy" heir and there is also maybe a bug with that. Because from what I saw, every tribal kingdoms that form during the game blow up in successions, no matter the stats of the new king.
3- Converting to Zoroastrianism when you are tribal transform automatically your government into the "Eransharh" one, which can be a big problem.
1- There seems to be a bug with tribal organization and succession. Basically the tooltip says that non-existent to medium tribal organization in kingdoms put it at risk of imploding during succession. The problem is that even if you have high or absolute tribal organization, the tribal kingdom will always explode which is very frustrating especially if you can't change from tribalism.
2- Also, regarding tribal kingdoms explosion, there should be something to tell you what is exactly a "worthy" heir and there is also maybe a bug with that. Because from what I saw, every tribal kingdoms that form during the game blow up in successions, no matter the stats of the new king.
3- Converting to Zoroastrianism when you are tribal transform automatically your government into the "Eransharh" one, which can be a big problem.
This a small bug.
Start year 480 some Romans in Africa are 480 year old.
They died right away.
Thank.
Start year 480 some Romans in Africa are 480 year old.
They died right away.
Thank.
There is a last Punic culture province in Malta, but they don't have family name list and spawn as "Smith".
That must be an outdated tooltip, since the risk of implosion is for all tribal rulers until they become High Tribal, noted.
Generally the AI is unable to form lasting tribal realms, yes, but that is intentional since it reflects how these realms relied much more on personal loyalties and how each new ruler could be challenged by vassals. That being said we can look into making it more clear how to avoid implosion upon succession.
Noted.
Where exactly? Within the Vandal kingdom? We will try to localise them.
Noted.