Link the new score system to ethics and history

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Narva

First Lieutenant
34 Badges
Apr 2, 2017
240
26
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Divine Wind
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Crusader Kings II
With a score system coming to Stellaris, what I would love would be if the things you score and lose points for varied according to your Ethics and Civics - a pacifist empire would view its wars as shameful, whereas a militarist one would think of them as glorious; xenophobes would gain points for exterminating alien species, while Xenophiles would gain points for the number of different species in their empire; Rogue Servitors would score points by pampering organics, Honorbound Warriors would gain points when their own ships died in battle, that sort of thing. Points for roleplaying, basically, so people playing to win get to enjoy more of the fun characterful side of the game.

Ethics-switching is where it would get interesting. The way I see it working is that your historical actions get re-assessed when you change Ethics, so those wars of aggression that used to give you points when you were a militarist might start dragging you down now you're a pacifist. There might then be ways to mitigate the negative effects of that, such as the newly-minted pacifist paying reparations to empires they invaded (which the recipient empire could choose to reject), or the Xenophobe-to-Xenophile switcher engaging in projects to clone species they exterminated. Interactions between empires might be a part of this, so you might have systems for historical revisionism and propaganda to alter the scores other empires get for their historical actions, and/or ways to try to shift the Ethics of other empires through subterfuge and thereby tank their scores. These systems could tie into the faction system, into future political conflict systems, and so forth. The idea is that your score isn't just a gamey win-condition but also simulates how your empire sees itself and how history is thought about, as well as enabling new, interesting tradeoffs and forms of conflict.

Dq74Y-HWoAA6-UE.jpg:large
 
Upvote 0
An afterthought: the way this would have to work would be that potential point-scoring events would be recorded in a log of each empire's history, which is something a lot of people have been calling for anyway. ('Events', here, would include ongoing things like the number of species in your empire in a given period - the way things would be grouped into different individual 'events' and the points available for each event would have to be fairly carefully balanced to make the points-interference mechanics play well.)