Smth strange with Naval Aircraft MIO

[Iwo Jima]

This MIO gives +10% range, while range doesn't matter to carrier planes, only to naval bombers. Little bit strange but OK.

The most interesting, it gives +5% to ground attack and +0% to naval attack. Naval(!!!) aircraft designer. Looks like absurd.

As I see, its the most useless aircraft MIO in the game.

 

[Kayzer-i Anadolu]

This MIO gives +10% range, while range doesn't matter to carrier planes, only to naval bombers. Little bit strange but OK.

The most interesting, it gives +5% to ground attack and +0% to naval attack. Naval(!!!) aircraft designer. Looks like absurd.

As I see, its the most useless aircraft MIO in the game.

Another strange and unexplained decision. There is no reason for taking this MIO.

 

[Umbosch]

I understand what you mean but is there no risk that this units with naval attack or targeting bonus are to strong in seabattle? 10% range why not. Can be helpfull when you attack land with CVs, for example Japan. The 15% relaibility sounds very good for me. Only mediumplains get 20% from a other designer.

 

[Iwo Jima]

I understand what you mean but is there no risk that this units with naval attack or targeting bonus are to strong in seabattle? 10% range why not. Can be helpfull when you attack land with CVs, for example Japan. The 15% relaibility sounds very good for me. Only mediumplains get 20% from a other designer.

Maybe youu right. Maybe +5% naval atack could destroy balance, but then its a question to this balance. Moreover, some other MIOs give little bonuses to naval atack, while this gives zero (not Zero)
Now Naval Aircraft MIO is absolutely counterintuitive and have not much sense. Japan has better MIOs for aircraft, for example.

 

[PadaV4]

This MIO gives +10% range, while range doesn't matter to carrier planes, only to naval bombers. Little bit strange but OK.

The most interesting, it gives +5% to ground attack and +0% to naval attack. Naval(!!!) aircraft designer. Looks like absurd.

Well technically there is carrier CAS which benefits from both range and ground attack.

 

[Iwo Jima]

Well technically there is carrier CAS which benefits from both range and ground attack.

technically you right. but its one of the most useless planes, while workhorses Navs get nothing

 

[Caeric]

technically you right. but its one of the most useless planes, while workhorses Navs get nothing

You can technically get more naval attack using 3x AP dive bombs (3x6) than a single medium torpedo (17) if you use CAS and lower production cost for the modules 3x1 vs 4

 

[Ringwraith_JP]

technically you right. but its one of the most useless planes, while workhorses Navs get nothing

They're not completely useless, I use them quite often to support naval invasions.

Edit: not sure if enough people are aware of this, but CV CAS on carriers assigned the Naval Invasions Support Mission will automatically participate on the invasion battles.