• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
1. Defining Russian Territorial Claims
we should claim all original land belonging to the Russian Empire, and also the many territorial aims that autocratic russia had, such as northern persia, Manchuria, Mongolia, lands belonging to the Ma clique, and all the slav lands, these being Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Greece, the Dalmatian coast, Poland, the czech and slovak lands and germany east of Berlin. also, Turkey, because a strong Orthodox nation must have Hagia Sophia among it's main churches.
2. Distribution of State Resources
we should direct our strenghts towards the land army. Our people should have enough to live, and not a single penny more.

3. Air Force Strategy
direct our research towards strategic bombing, to bomb our enemy's industries flat.


4. Navy Strategy
we do not need a strong navy, as we are mainly a continental power.
 
also

1. Status of the Russian Orthodox Church (urgent)
make it our national religion as fast as possible.

2. Economic Development Strategy (urgent)
industries, industres, industries! we should create more and more factories, especially in distant lands, so that they won't be seized by petty invaders.

3. Economic Regulation (urgent)
a strong, state-controlled economy should do the job.

4. Army Reform (urgent)
keep Markov's idea. armored vehicles for the win.

5. Long Term Political Strategy (noncritical)
grr... these syndies and democrats should get of mah lawn. things looked so good under the Tsar...

6. Foreign Policy (noncritical)
ally with... urgh, the syndies! so that we can excert our rightful control over the lands west of us, when germany falls to them. the rest will come easily.
 
Territorial Claims: I support the idea that Finland should "merge". However I am against the Idea of expanding further into Western Europe besides the Baltic, Belerus and the Ukraine.
Naval: I agree that a small Navy, mainly for Ampibous and defence should be kept.
Airforce: I also beleive a Airforce made of Bombers and Small Fighters/Interceptors be kept.
 
Just from the gameplay point of view, why do people opt for STRAT bombers? I have always played with TAC since taking out the enemy industry seemed like too much trouble when you can instead obliterate their armies. But maybe there is some deeper strategy here that I'm not understanding.
 
Just from the gameplay point of view, why do people opt for STRAT bombers? I have always played with TAC since taking out the enemy industry seemed like too much trouble when you can instead obliterate their armies. But maybe there is some deeper strategy here that I'm not understanding.

Nukes. You need means to deliver them, and ICBMs don't come until 1951.
 
Current Members of the Administration:

The Administration’s recommendations are received and noted. The meeting with Pavel Milyukov is scheduled for two days from now. You will be kept informed of future developments.

Issues Facing the Administration:

1. Defining Russian Territorial Claims (noncritical)
The Russian Empire once ruled over a great territory encompassing many different people. Today the Russian Republic is still a multiethnic state but it is undeniably more monolithic than the Russian Empire was. The Administration has to decide on whether it is worth for the Republic to try to recapture lost lands (and which lands) or whether Russia should support the creation of progressive democratic pro-Russian states in the near abroad.

2. Distribution of State Resources (noncritical)
For the moment all state resources are directed into production of consumer goods in order to lower the economic hardship faced by the population. In the near future we expect to have resources available for other uses and as such the Administration has to decide whether to prioritize construction of new industry, reinforcement of the armed forces, technological upgrade of military equipment, or creation of new military units.

3. Air Force Strategy (noncritical)
Most of the Russian Air Force was scrapped in the later part of the Kerensky rule, and the new Government needs to put together a strategy towards the use and development of the Air Force. It is unlikely that Russia will have the resources to develop and build more than one type of bomber (strategic, tactical, close air support) and one type of air to air place (fighter, interceptor) so a decision needs to be made regarding which designs to pursue. The development of a doctrine will follow from the types of planes selected.

4. Navy Strategy (noncritical)
Most of the Russian Air Force was scrapped in the later part of the Kerensky rule, and the new Government needs to put together a strategy towards the use and development of the Navy. Depending on how many resources the Administration wishes to dedicate to the Navy choices can range from a submarine-only navy aimed at harassing enemies to a battleship or carrier based fleet. In addition the Administration has to decide what doctrine our Navy should follow and what ship designs should be developed.

Map of Potential Russian Claims:

Russiaclaims.png

1. Claims;
I say Russia need to establish herself as an Eurasian hegemon. To do that reconquering old lands might be necessary. We need to reach the Black Sea again. We need to get our hands on more harbours in the Baltic Sea. We might need to recapture the resource rich lands of the Caucasus to further our industialization. I'd say we must reunite with our East Slavic brothers first; the Belarussians, the Ukrainians and the Cossacks. Then we have to hinder the spread of German influence by taking the Baltic Duchy as ours.
All Asian adventures need to be defensive to defend ethnic Russian or oherwise allied population there.

2. If we want to modernize our army we need to invest in a massive industrialization. We are far beyond the Germans and the Syndies. If we want to be the shining beacon of democracy in Europe we need to catch up.

3. Strategic bombing is a good strategy. Bomb the insustries of the enemy.

4. I can say the navy is in a sad shape. But we need to capture more harbours before we can even consider naval expansion. Our strength now lies in our land forces.

More suggestions proposed by Stormbringer;

1.Status of the Church;
We're a secular state, while we don't want to upset the church too much, we need to remind the clergy that they hav no place in politics in a modern democracy.

2. Economic Development Strategy;
We need to build a strong industrial base, all our aims should be directed towards that end.

3. Economic Regulation;
The government should not have an extended control over the economy in a democratic state, but we should control the most essential parts for now, we can't afford to allow the private market to screw up in these dangerous times.

4. Army Reform;
We need our manpower. Denikin is right, a massive conscription army is unfortunately the only thing that hinder bandits and thugs from overrunning the country right now.

5. Long Term Policy goals;
As long as we are on the same page as our coalition allies we keep them, if they cause trouble, we kick them out and create a Leftist coalition. But only if they are the ones causing trouble.

6. Foreign Policy;
Our policy need to have three steps;
Step 1; Support ethnic Russians and East Slavs abroad, promise to defend them from abuse.
Step 2; Reintegrate essential lost territory into Russia.
Step 3; Become the champion of democracy, denounce both Germany and the Syndicalists. Fight for a democratic revolution in Europe.
 
Domestic advisor Vincent of TRP rises to the Duma :p
Gentlemen, comrades, Russians

Issues Facing the Administration:

1. Defining Russian Territorial Claims (noncritical)
It is time to reassert Russian hegemony and our rightfull satus as world power. This, however, is not achieved by wildly laying claims to foreign lands based on prehistoric assumptions and ethnic policies. I can assure you, this will greatly antagonize our enemies and will not help us. A few things are in order:

- The old Tsarist Empire was, and always has been, righteously Russian, with the exception of Poland, Finland and Manchuria. We have no claim to these ethnically different peoples and should respect their freedom (as puppets to the Motherland). For all the other stated claims, however, it belongs to the Motherland, and by god, we must retake it for the Motherland!

2. Distribution of State Resources (noncritical)
I believe we must prioritize lowering dissent among the population first, which should liberate more resource for (in this order)

1. Upgrading and reinforcing our outdated military
2. Beginning an Industrial Expanse programme. I suggest doing one Two Year plan, which will raise our base ic with about 30-40, while focussing heavily on research devloping our available IC and research capabilities

3. Air Force Strategy (noncritical)
The Air Force is highly noncritical at this point. I suggest focussing on Multi-Role Fighters for their superior range, and keep out of the bombing department for now

4. Navy Strategy (noncritical)
A navy? We are Russians! Russians do not need this waste of IC!

That is all. Gentlemen of the Duma:
Long live the Federation, and glory to the Motherland!
 
++++++++++++++PRESIDENTIAL EYES ONLY++++++++++++++​



The administration come to the following conclusions. The Chief of the Presidential Staff presents his comments and the results of several discussions.

Topic 1: Defining Russian The Role of the Church.

Despite discussions and rumours hinting at the election of Mikhail Polski'i to position of Prime Minister, this notion of a clerical list is... absurd. Orthodox Christianity shall formally be declared the state religion.

Topic 2: Long Term Economic Policy

The Council is Unanimous Mister President. Build Factories. NOW!

Topic 3: Short Term Economic Policy

Essential Government Industries such as the various vehicle manufacture combines, the shipyards, the arsenals and gunsmithies as well as strategic materials stocks and mines should be consolidated under Government control - the private market cannot be trusted with vital industries such as these.

Topic 4: Armed Forces Reforms

Almost as divisive within the council as in the army. The following recommendation is made. If the Government wishes to persue General Markov's Scheme, sufficient allocation of resources and industrial production must be directed into the construction of tanks and motorised divisions. If no such allocation is forthcoming then General Denikin's plans would be the most optimal for the long term. This question simply hinges on the result of industrial allocation and the President's preference. It is widely felt that Markov is 20 years ahead of his time, but we could have his Молниеносная война operational within 3 given the right economic incentives and government programs.

Topic 5: Political Strategy.

The Council have given various responses, ranging from allying with Bukharin to burning Bukharin, alive, at a stake along with other politicians and instituting a Tsar once again. Thus it is felt that the President must follow his gut on this, as no consensus has been achieved.

Topic 6: Foreign Strategy

The Promotion of Russian Groups Abroad would serve our purposes most admirably.
 
Last edited:
Thank you KM!

To summarize the decisions so far, with my comments:

1. Establish a broad SR-Kadet Coalition. Completed.

2. Begin building a new bureauracy to extend control over the country. Completed. (Ouch to the 25 dissent hit)

3. Capital to be officially put in Moscow. Pending, no objections.

4. Foreign policy - aggressively promote pro-Russian democratic regimes.

5. Russian claims abroad will include all Russian-inhabited territories plus some strategic areas. Surrounding states will be brought in as autonomous self-governing entities.

6. Distribution of Resources. Reinforce the army, then build industry.

7. Regulatory Policy - a balance between state-owned and private-owned sectors.

8. Economic Policy - encourage industry rather than military production or resource extracting operations.

9. Army - tanks and mobility.

10. Air Force - strategic bombers.

11. Navy - battleships, but low priority.

12. Future political regime - to be determined.

13. Status of the Church - recognition of Orthodoxy as the official religion of Russia. Is there a specific reason for the Administration's recommendation in this regard?

Ok, I play tonight and then update tomorrow. Good job people!
 
From: the Army advisor to the President
To: The president and all advisors
Re: Risk analysis of potential opponents - Europe


Mitteleuropa

Germany: Germany is currently the strongest Empire in the world. Their armies are modern and well equipped, their airforce is an example to the rest of the world and their navy dwarfs all others. However, Germany is mostly occupied with the threat that the French Commune poses. We doubt Germany will strike first, but Germany will fight for its allies, making conflict in the future likely if we choose to rebuild the Russia of the Czars.
Risk of war: moderate
Potential threat: Very high

Vereinigte Baltische Herzogtum (VBH): This Duchy was formed from our former Baltic territories after the Great War. The greatest threat they pose is their closeness to St Petersburg. Their army, existing of a small German-speaking Landswehr is of no consequence.
Risk of war: moderate
Potential threat: low

Lithuania: Yet another weak German puppetstate. They will only pose a threat in the unlikely case Lithuania will revive the Union of Lomza with Poland.
Risk of war: moderate
Potential threat: low

White Ruthenia: the weakest of all German puppetstates. Backward and poor, White Ruthenia is torn by the dynastic struggles between the king and his brother. Civil War (and German intervention) very likely.
Risk of war: moderate
Potential threat: low

Ukraine: Ukraine is by far the most powerful of all German satellites. Their substantial armies are supported by a solid industrial base. The inequalies between the rich and poor have led to the rise of the syndicalist demagogue Nikita Khrushchev. In case the 'Peoples Hetman' seizes power, a split between Ukraine and Mitteleuropa might give us an opportunity to intervene.
Risk of war: high
Potential threat: moderate

Other states:

Finland: The current Lapua-government has eyed Karelia for some time now, however we doubt that they are suicidal enough to fight us head-on. Their rhetorics are empty.
Risk of war: low
Potential threat: low

Ottoman Empire: An unlikely opponent at present, but who knows what the future might bring? The Straits have been a goal of every Czar since Piotr Veliky, and the Ottomans still have a tendency to meddle in the Balkans. Armenia, a former part of the Empire, is now an Ottoman protectorate. These remain distant goals however.
Risk of war: low
Potential threat: moderate

Don-Kuban Union: Our relations with the Cossack State are cordial at present. However, our current goals might bring us into conflict with them. We wish to stress that peaceful unification is preferable to armed conflict.
Risk of war: low
Potential threat: moderate

Georgia: After the Civil War, the Bolshevist remnants, led by Lavrenti Beria, set up an independent state in Georgia. Ironically they call themselves Menshevists! Beria has the tendency to use his secret police to meddle in the affairs of neighbouring countries. We would advise the council to remove this potential problem as soon as possible.
Risk of war: moderate
Potential threat: moderate

Azerbaidjan: The oil rich Azeri are currently negotiating an alliance with Persia and Afghanistan. This might make regaining their territory more effort that it is worth at present.
Risk of war: low
Potential threat: low/moderate

We hope to give a proper risk analysis of Asia as soon as possible.

With regards, FlyingDutchie
 
OOC here, but very nice AAR Stormbringer. This is a system of writing (democracy system) done before, but the KR world is really wonderfull for this because you never really know what'll happen :p
 
Brilliant! Thank you FD! I hope everyone else takes note of this analysis when making suggestions on foreign policy tomorrow after the update.

And thank you Vincent for the comment. I want to encourage everyone to write as much as possible. Feel free to create your character's backgrounds, biases, whatever. The more content there is here the better.
 
From: the Army advisor to the President
To: The president and all advisors
Re: Risk analysis of potential opponents - Asia

Alash-Orda: The former Steppes General-Directorate. The Alash-Orda is split between Russians, Kazachs and Cossacks living within its borders. If the rights of the Russian citizens are properly respected, peaceful reintegration might be possible.
Risk of war: low
Potential threat: low

Turkestan: The former Turkestan General-Directorate. Currently it is ruled by expantionist mad Mullahs, who are eying the Alash Orda. They are a severe threat to the stability of the area.
Risk of war: high
Potential threat: low

Xibei San Ma: The name means 'the land of the three Ma's, and it is ruled by these three warlords of the Ma-clan. The land is mostly inhabited by Uigurs and Muslim Chinese, neither of which have any ties with us.
Risk of war: low
Potential threat: low

Mongolia: An expantionist state ruled by the mad baron Ungern Von Sternberg, who seized power during the chaos following the Civil War. He even seized tracks of the Trans-Siberia Railroad! The army sees the Mad Baron as the biggest threat to the peace in the region. We advise to remove him from power as soon as possible, preferably before he strikes at the three Ma's.
Risk of war: very high
Potential threat: moderate

Fengtien republic: A Japanese puppetstate in Manchuria. The Czars lost their influence in the region after the Russo-Japanese war. Trying to regain this influence will mean war with Japan.
Risk of war: moderate
Potential threat: low

Primorsk: A Japanese puppetstate between the Amur and the Ussuri, centered around Vladivostock and ruled by the treacherous admiral Kolchak. If we wish to regain our influence in the Pacific we will need Primorsk to be reincluded. Some businessmen are pressing for a plebicite to rejoin with us, but we doubt that Japan will allow such a move.
Risk of war: moderate
Potential threat: low

Japan: Our mortal enemy in the east after our loss in the Russo-Japanese war. Any move from our part in regaining influence in the east will be countered by them. Some expantionist Japanese generals are even eying Siberia! War with Japan in the future seems unavoidable.
Risk of war: high
Potential threat: high
 
And again, a wonderful job!

New assignment for the Army Affairs Adviser:

We require a new defense strategy. Russia currently has 113 Infantry divisions, 2 Cavalry divisions, and 1 HQ division. In addition we have 15 artillery brigades and 2 engineer brigades as well as 2 squadrons of tactical bombers. We require a report that details the necessary distribution of the military on our borders so that it is able to counter potential threats.
 
To the President:
Mr President, I am worried of talk of expansion by the Japenese but Korea is a land that can hold value. However, I cannot bear the thought of war with a empire so powerfull, do we really need such a war for land? I most certainly beleive a "merger" with the Ukraine is highly worth it, but the threat of war with the German Empire is much like Japan. I will help you in any possible.

Gregory Zackonov, Advisor to the President.
 
KaiserMuffin, the closest translation of Blitzkrieg into Russian would be Молниеносная война (Thunder-like war), although noone ever cared to translate the word, it got adopted as блицкриг. :D