Interior Minister Zyhokhyen:
Thank-you for your response to my prior message. I would like to point out that the high court did not say that the plaintiff in Al'Sahwari v. Minister of Finance was missing, but that:
Counsel for Per Al'Sahwari...shall have 7 days from the issuing of this order to appear for oral argument. Should Counsel fail to do so, this suit shall be dismissed with prejudice.
The suggestion was that you or your counsel could approach the plaintiff and seek to become the replacement for the missing counsel. As that case bears directly on the issue of whether the Finance Minister had the power to implement the regulations in question or not, its resolution would appear to settle this issue.
You also stated a hope that legal action can be avoided, but offered no alternative. I was aware, Alan Jones was aware, and Saul Florian will soon be if he is not already aware, i.e. all the Finance Ministers since the implementation of the regulation are aware that you felt it was a matter for Interior Minister rather than the Finance Minister. You were told, in no uncertain terms, first by myself and then by Alan Jones, while we were Finance Ministers, that we disagreed. Thus, there clearly was an unresolved dispute, between you and the Finance Ministry, with a court case that could have led to its resolution. Now that you are Interior Minister, you appear to have standing to bring suit on this matter directly, if you don't want to insert yourself in the prior case. Rather than issuing a contradictory regulation, consultation or legal action would have seemed to have been the appropriate course of action to press your view.
Have you consulted with the new Finance Minister and gotten his agreement on this matter? If not, the dispute is still unresolved. Your announcement, claiming to undo the supplemental registration fees, does not resolve the matter at hand, as the heart of the matter, which cabinet minister has jurisdiction over this has not been agreed. Thus, as this is therefore not a method to resolve the matter at hand, I ask you one last time to actually commence a process that would lead to its resolution, not its escalation, as your announcement did. If you do not, I predict that the court action you hoped to avoid will swiftly ensue.
Signed,