pillaging teleporters and spell jammers should not grant evil alignement.

[akinata]

in a lore perspective you are not destroying ressources for the people but prevent strategic military use of the teleporter AND disable one of the enemy defences.
in a gameplay perspective, pillaging a spell jammer is mandatory depending on your culture traits or greatly helps the attackers into attacking a city.
as for teleporters it is self explanatory...
it severly punish good aligned players.

 

[Goblin-Cookie]

It should also not grant resources.

 

[Melikat]

I've noticed (at least in the case of a Sanctuary) that you can simply occupy the improvement and it will disable it. After occupying a Sanctuary I was able to pillage the rest of the provinces in the city, even before the Sanctuary was pillaged. I suspect the same would be true of teleporters or spelljammers? (Not that I disagree with removing the evil act from pillaging Spelljammers, but at least there is a method to bypass it).

 

[akinata]

I've noticed (at least in the case of a Sanctuary) that you can simply occupy the improvement and it will disable it. After occupying a Sanctuary I was able to pillage the rest of the provinces in the city, even before the Sanctuary was pillaged. I suspect the same would be true of teleporters or spelljammers? (Not that I disagree with removing the evil act from pillaging Spelljammers, but at least there is a method to bypass it).

yes but that means putting a unit there while the attack is a bout to happen. which could also get wiped out by an external force while you main force is sieging.
i hope pillaged sector cannot get rebuild while the city is being sieged tho... or it would negate the purpose of that pillaging.

 

[evilcat]

It would be nice if we could disable politly improvment. So we can disable spelljammers or teleporters without profits of pillaging. No money, healing and so on.