This went badly - screwed up with the change of page.
-edit: and now I didn't -
My apologies o
-edit: and now I didn't -
My apologies o
Last edited:
Good point, I'll try that.Miihkali said:You can still fix it, just delete your former post and post them again, then they both will be on this page and our 'discussion' on previous page and in start of this page
Your opinion shall be taken into consideration comrades, we thank you for it.Jan Skrzetuski said:I have talked with comrades from my factory - we all think that submarine production is quite risky undertaking at the moment - our Republican Navy specialises in battleships and it would take years before we can train enough good seamen and officers for submarine warfare. Even with the best equipement available, lack of experience would make us very vulnerable. So, our final opinion is: we sholud focus on great cannons mounted on enormous warships that can destroy not only another ships, but also fortifications and enemy coastal artillery. Moreover, some of us think that aircraft carriers should be second element of our sea power.
Well then, another question for the U(nion)-man Sarmatia is in orderJan Skrzetuski said:Oh - and we have watched the film - it's very inspirating, but lack of music makes it less enjoyable. Some patriotic melodies, i.e. our national anthem would be a great addition to such productions.
SnichtheWalrus said:While my comrades and I support the expansion of the Navy we have concerns over the state of the Army and Air Forces. While the Navy can intercept, bombard and land troop they cannot occupy territory and are vulnerable to aircraft. Carriers and subs seem a good option but how about some Army modernization first.
I'm afraid I am at fault with you comrades, for I have neglected the updates on our most Revolutionary Army. Ever since January 1936 there has been a constant triple series of infantry in production, changed to 1939 infantry when it became availiable. We also produced 4 divisions of armored forces so far.DarkReborn said:I've been talking to my comerades soldiers in the barracks, sure, the navy and the airforce are needed for tactical situations, specially for disembarks, but the ones who rised against the royalist scum were us, the people's army, we need more comerades soldiers, more tanks and more big, and big artillery cannons, that's sure thing.
Gigalocus said:Ah, i see the Vanguard has made an appearence
Well you see comrades - the Hammer isn't the Vanguard. The later was ordered in 1941, beeing closer in game to a 1941 BBV then to a 1938 BBVII (SHBB).trekaddict said:I salute the comrades at the dockyards, but I have a question if allowed: why did we not call the class Vanguard Class, as it is the vanguard of the Republican Navy?
Unfortunatly the events surrounding the whole afair have a couple of problems I haven't been able to solve yet, so we'll have to wait until the KR team can respond to their thread. oSouthCarolinian said:now we'll get to see how well the Union's navy does against the German navy. hopefully you'll crush them.
There's not much to say about them anyhow. Except that they have a czar again, wich in itself... says it allRGB said:There's no picture of White Russia by the way.
But I'm pretty sure it sucks even without any pictures.
th3freakie said:Unfortunatly the events surrounding the whole afair have a couple of problems I haven't been able to solve yet, so we'll have to wait until the KR team can respond to their thread.