It shouldn't be dynastic or government based. Because they are changeable.Am I the only who finds it sad that the mighty "Ottoman Empire" was renamed to "Ottomans"?
It shouldn't be dynastic or government based. Because they are changeable.Am I the only who finds it sad that the mighty "Ottoman Empire" was renamed to "Ottomans"?
Agreed. Hopefully this change is consistent; i.e. we don't have Ottomans and The Mamluks.It shouldn't be dynastic or government based. Because they are changeable.
Well true dat, we should get egypt with mamluk dynasty, and turkey with ottoman dynasty.
Indeed. Having to regularly patrol every sea zone is very tedious.
It happens in CK2 but if you zoom in you can always distinguish between them easily.In the first screenshot I can see Crimea's fleet and army stationed in one province, and one eclipsing the other's info banner (which, I guess, also serves as a selection tool). This might not be overly good news.
You don't. A ship in an adjacent port keeps the sea zone free of pirates. A big fleet can keep under control a big swath of ocean. You don't need to literally patrol the sea zones.
The lack of provinces is bugging me. It should have at least as many provinces as CK2 imo.
Am I the only who finds it sad that the mighty "Ottoman Empire" was renamed to "Ottomans"?
Ottoman Turkey would have been better...
Ottoman Turkey would have been better...
This.Indeed. Make the country colors look a bit more like those in CK II, and not so... pastel? as they are here.