• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
IV. Two Crowns for Two Kingdoms

Two Crowns

Ironically, Charles I passed away during one of the coldest days of the year, even as he had seized the throne. His son, Charles of Cornwall, was declared Charles II by the people of London, although his coronation (like many) was delayed for some months.

Charles of Cornwall never expected to become king. The youngest son of a relatively minor Lancastrian lord, there were a dozen more likely men who could have become king had his father not seized the moment and had himself crowned that winter day during the siege of London. Even then, his elder brother John was considered to be the new heir to the throne until his death from scrofula. John was the favored son; Charles was neglected by his father until he became the only son.

It is telling that it is precisely because of these circumstances that Charles became one of the greatest kings that England has ever known.

When he ascended the throne, Charles II was still an enigma to the court. Like his late brother John, Charles preferred to stay far away from Parliament on his estates. But while John had spent his time indulging in falconry and womanizing, Charles preferred to spend his time taking charge of the affairs of his estates. In fact, although he had been granted only a minor fief in Cornwall from his father, his lands had become more productive than his brother's by the time the latter died in 1470. With a reputation for strict honesty, fairness and efficiency, Parliament naturally wondered what the new king would be like in London.

A first taste of his style of rule was not long in coming. The new monarch spent several weeks reorganizing the court to his fancy, replacing many of his father's favorites with more capable men. He had no shortage of applicants, but Charles was a shrewd judge of character and more interested in a man's ability than his credentials. Despite this, he sent away few men disgruntled, being able to convince many a man his talents were needed elsewhere. But two applicants in particular caused the court to hold their collective breaths.

1476-Tudors.jpg

Jasper and Edmund Tudor were the younger half-brothers of Henry VI, born of a liason between Henry's mother Catherine and Owen-ap-Tudor, a Welsh gentleman. Although bastards, they had a legitimate claim to the throne - and arguably a better one than Charles himself had. Charles immediately welcomed the brothers to court and gave them positions of great responsibility, publicly declaring to all his complete trust in the brothers - a decision he did not have cause to regret. From that point on the House of Tudor's fortunes rose and fell with England's.

1476 was a busy year in London. Charles' court was bustling with changes and plans, yet despite all the gains in efficiency there was remarkably little concrete to show for it. To the average layman, Charles seemed little different than his father; life would go on as normal for England. The first sign that things might be difference came the following winter.

It was in December that Charles began mixing Celtic soldiers in his English armies. Scottish and Irish Galloglaigh troops had long been the bane of the Anglo-Saxon troops in the north or the Pale, fierce mercenary warriors who were deadly in close combat and famed for their surprise attacks. Despite initial resistance from the rank and file, Charles was able to seamlessly integrate the two forces, making them much tougher overall.

The change was soundly protested by Parliament, but still toothless they were unable to do much more than grumble. There were some who called Charles II a traitor, but they were won over by Charles and his young queen, Caroline of Scotland. When Stuart I had approached Charles to arrange a marriage between their houses, both kings agreed to the marriage believing that it would never threaten their rule. Charles, after all, was not the heir to the throne, and Stuart had sons and cousins waiting to inherit. When the Scottish king broke the marriage treaty and invaded, some called for Charles to send his wife and children back to Scotland, shamed, but the young lord refused. Instead, the bride and groom waited in growing horror as they heard of Stuart's last stand and John Knox's bloody conquest of Edinburgh castle.

Charles I believed he had stamped out the Scottish royal line; Charles II revived it. He could claim with some legitimacy two crowns: as son of Charles I, he was king of England, but as son-in-law of Stuart, he could claim the throne of Scotland as well. With the northern kingdom already in his hands, it was a fait accomplit, and when Charles asked to be crowned in Edinburgh Parliament readily agreed.

And so, on Wednesday, March 29th, 1477, Charles was crowned in Scotland, with a host of English, Scottish and even Irish lords and ladies in attendance, much to their mutual displeasure. It came as a shock to all, however, what happened next. By the grace of God, Charles of Cornwall was crowned Charles II, king of the United Kingdoms of the English and Celts, and claiming all of Great Britain as his birthright.

1477-UnitedKingdom.jpg

March 29, 1477, a day that will live in schoolboy's textbooks forever

1477-Map.jpg

1477 map showing the extent that Charles II claimed for the nascent 'United Kingdoms'

Charles was met with disbelief, but he stubbornly pressed his claims and, with charm more than force, gradually won over the lords to his side. Charles was a gentleman, a true noble in all senses of the word. He had a rare talent of knowing how to win loyalty and persuade his enemies, and he combined that with a tireless dedication to his calling that left the United Kingdoms in far better hands than England or its new united kingdoms had seen for decades. Since he was publicly disliked by his father he could win over the Yorkists to his cause, but as a true Lancastrian heir he won over his family as well. Married to a Scottish princess, he adapted to their ways easily and became especially well loved there for the money he spent there lavishly, much to the chagrin of Parliament (there is still a Scottish distiller that uses his coat of arms on its label). In Ireland, his claims to the throne were more convoluted and more divisive, with both Irish and Englishmen on both sides of the issue. Curiously, the only group who wholeheartedly supported his claim to Ireland were the Scots.

It was Ireland that Charles was to focus on. His efforts for the next few years were spent winning the Irish earls over to his United Kingdoms with a three-pronged effort: granting titles and lands to the earls, subsidizing a nascent middle class there which would see British unity as a blessing for commerce, and creating a powerful army and navy as a show of force. His policy bore fruit when many of the northern earls swore fealty and became lords of Great Britain, including the Duke of Ulster.

Further inroads into Eire were stymied for some time as the Irish were upset by the deposition of the pope in Europe. Having fled Rome to a new holy see in Auvergne, the holy father was - in a fit of cosmic irony - deposed by the count of Avignon, a former Roman possession. Although Charles was a staunch Catholic, his attention was captured more by the news from the east: Sweden was forced into a humiliating peace with Muscovy, giving up most of their possessions to the schismatic Slavs. As things heated up at home, things got worse on the Continent as well: the Holy Roman Empire declared that a landless pope was in the interests of the empire, while Hungary collapsed in the face of a Turkish invasion, giving control of the Balkans to the Ottomans in one fell swoop. However, by early 1479 it looked like things were settling back to normal, and Leinster was proving receptive to his overtures when everything changed.

On February 3, France declared war.

The False War

Although Charles had made some strides towards making the United Kingdoms a military power, France still held all the cards in 1479. Allied to Burgundy, France and Burgundy together had over 40,000 men under arms in the north, while Calais was almost defenseless. In the isles the British had around 21,000 men under arms, with little to no support from their Irish allies.

On the continent there was a race between Henri II of France and Claude de Marle of Burgundy to see which could take Calais first (the last British town there fell two months later). Charles retaliated by sending the Scottish army into the Orkney isles, owned by France's ally Norway. In the meantime, he began a diplomatic offensive: first he replaced his spymaster with a mastermind, the infamous 'Lord Black' whose true identity is still unclear, centuries later. Then he arranged with the archbishop of Utrecht to allow his troops to use their lands as a staging point for raids into Burgundy.

At the same time, the crown financed the purchase of a number of new ships called 'barques' from the Continent using a new, more manueverable style that made them deadlier in combat. The new navy was unable to do much, however, being trapped in port by a fleet of over 20 Burgundian warships. Lacking experienced commanders or veteran sailors, Charles decided not to test the Franco-Burgundian navies. Instead, the United Kingdoms followed a bold new policy, unheard of in its history.

It ignored the war.

Leaving the English towns of Calais and Dunkirk flying the fleur-de-lis, Charles used his new navy to hunt Burgundian privateers and French raiding parties in Ireland. The French raids, designed to remove the Irish allies from the war, only made them realize how much they depended on the British armies stationed there. In the meantime, Charles kept taxes low and spent his money building roads in Scotland, fulfilling promises made at his coronation and enriching the north considerably. By 1483, the new Scottish Bourgeoisie had gained enough strength to demand concessions from the crown, which Charles granted; this proved beneficial to the burgeoning shipbuilding industry in the north.

This 'false war' continued for several years. Despite their naval superiority, the French were unable to land more than a few thousand troops at a time in the British isles and, wrongfully perceiving the real war to be in France as it had for the last century, never invaded Britain in force. Expecting a counter attack at any moment, the French continued to maintain their forces at full strength and taxed their people heavily to pay for the war. Although they maintained their grip on Calais, the French were losing the war of public opinion with each ship sunk and each invasion defeated. In comparison, in England Lord Suffolk was able to use the war as an excuse to bring order to the United Kingdoms, something that had proven impossible for the young king to do in peacetime.

Pirates and Privateers

But as much as France was hurting, the United Kingdoms were still far from winning the war. With only a limited control of the seas, the British had no way to regain Calais, let alone fight the war. By 1484 Charles signed orders that led to a new phase in the war: the British navy began picking off isolated French and Burgundian ships ferrying soldiers to the isles. These raids were by and large successful, but not without a price: several British ships were sunk in the process, despite the introduction of new cast bronze mortars. Still, these naval battles convinced Charles that the strategy could work.

The following year the king promoted Jeremy Herbert, one of the ship captains in the raid of St. George's channel, to admiral of the navy. Sir Jeremy made only a passable admiral, but there were few other candidates. Under Herbert the royal navy continued to win minor engagements, but stayed far from the English Channel.

Around Christmas, 1485, Charles II made a momentous decision to begin attacking shipping in the channel. His decision was probably influenced by the heady celebration going on at court at the time; Sir Joseph Benblow's incredible astronomical discoveries had brought much prestige to the United Kingdoms in international circles, and Charles was seeking a quick victory.

In March 1486 the royal navy intercepted a French ship isolated from the main fleet. Despite reports that the French fleet might be as close as a few hours away, Sir Jeremy decided to take the risk. The result was the fateful battle of Land's End, in which 12 English warships fought 15 French ships under one of the most capable French admirals. At the time it was thought to have been a French trap, but later evidence suggests that it was pure luck - if not entirely unsurprising. The result was no more surprising: the royal navy was decimated, with a few surviving ships limping back to Cornwall.

A contemporary folk song records the popular feelings of the time. With the French in control of the channel, many of the ships and their sailors came from the north; they were upset when the fleet was destroyed. However, far from rebelling against the king or the war, the blame was placed squarely on the shoulders of the lord admiral, Jeremy Herbert. This is typical of the charisma that characterized the court of Charles II.

Herbert's Navy

Where did all our young men go?
Hey-di Hi-di ho la
Off to England, row by row
Hey-di Hi-di ho

Old Laird Herbert built a navy
Built it out of forest green
Said the laird "the French will pay,
Dearly for all the death we've seen"

Where did all our young men go?
Hey-di Hi-di ho la
In the navy, row by row
Hey-di Hi-di ho

Old Laird Herbert sailed his ships
Sailed them to the shining sea
Said the laird "the French will pay,
We'll hunt their ships day after day"

Where did all our young men go?
Hey-di Hi-di ho la
To the channel, row by row
Hey-di Hi-di ho

Old Laird Herbert saw his chance
Saw a fleet of ships that day
Said the laird "the French will pay,
Let the dice roll where they may"

Where did all our young men go?
Hey-di Hi-di ho la
Up to Heaven, row by row
Hey-di Hi-di ho

Old Laird Herbert sailed home alone
Sailed one lone ship back to port
Said the laird "The French did pay,
But not so much as us to-day."


Encouraged by this victory, Henri II offered Charles a peace treaty to end the war that would result in the status quo, and Charles, despairing of any chance of turning the war into his favor, accepted. The ports of Calais and Dunkirk were returned to England while Orkney was returned to Norway, and both sides maintained their honor, so vitally important to both monarchs.

Only a few days after France and Burgundy made peace with the United Kingdoms, Burgundy annexed Switzerland. This overt aggression did one favor for the United Kingdoms: it convinced the pope to turn away from France in disgust and back to England.

Although the United Kingdoms had not won the war, she had achieved her aims: Great Britain had rallied around her king, won the pope's blessing, gained support from her Irish allies, maintained her territory and fought the French to a standstill. Even better was a gift to the state the following spring, in 1487, from Irish earls grateful for British protection during the war.

That June the Council of Ostergotland opened, and Charles made good use of his newly-won prestige by sending British bishops to the council and quietly supporting certain resolutions. The council went on to condemn the excesses of indulgence sellers, emphasized the importance of parishes, demanded that bishops supervise their parishes and finally ending the practice of paying annates for church benefices. The council ended on this high-water mark in September 1488. During the council Britain's standing in Christendom had risen substantially as British bishops, outnumbering those from many other Christian nations, had argued eruditely one way or the other.

1489-Council.jpg

The main issue of the Council of Ostergotland was that of payment for benefices

Two Kingdoms

At home, Charles squandered some of this prestige trying to convince the earls to join the Kingdoms. For two long years the Irish showed their stubbornness; finally, in the autumn of 1488, Charles forced their hand by sending his troops into Munster. This brazen act was typical of Charles, designed not only to convince the earls to accept his rule, which they did in short succession, but also for even grander aims. As most of Ireland accepted British sovereignty, Brittany became alarmed. Allied with the earl of Munster, the Bretons declared war on the United Kingdoms when British troops entered Munster, not realizing they were playing into the king's hands.

1488-Brittany.jpg

The War of British Unification began in 1488 with the invasion of Munster

Charles had as his goal the unification of all Anglo-Saxons and all Celts under one empire that would stretch from Scotland to Brittany and from Leinster to Anglia. As 'little Britain', Brittany was as much part of the British crown as Ireland. It was painfully obvious, however, that the situation was very different: Brittany was a strong country neighboring France, and the Bretons who lived there had little in common with the Irish, Welsh and Scots who made up the "Celts" of the United Kingdom.

It was unlikely that the French would sit idly by, and in fact French troops massed around the border with Brittany in an ominous manner. A potential conflict was averted, however, when shortly after the war began, Charles received an offer of alliance from the erstwhile French ally Burgundy. With them supporting the British - although merely in spirit - Britain could act unimpeded in Brittany.

A powerful English navy, mainly the powerful new carracks, quickly ferried across English armies into Brittany. Fierce resistance from the Bretons made little difference to the outcome; British troops lost one initial battle and then overwhelmed the defenders. After they won a few towns along the coast, victory was assured.

1489-Brittany.jpg

The invasion of Brittany began in 1489

1489-Moribhan.jpg

The pivotal battle of Moribhan, September 1489

Seeing the way things were going, Brittany's Francois II began negotiating in 1490, but only after the last Breton rebels surrendered in March did he even consider serious terms.

1490-Siege.jpg

The conquest of the Vendee broke the final Breton resistance

In fact, Francois proved remarkably stubborn; even while he was kept prisoner in the Tower of London, Francois resisted becoming a vassal of the king. After a year's fruitless negotiation, Charles was seriously considering simply annexing the country and leaving Francois in charge of a rump Breton state to satisfy the French. It was doubtless the thought of his country being divided that made Francois accept the inevitable; in 1491 he knelt in front of Charles II and pledged fealty to the king of the Britons, and Charles added a new kingdom to his empire.

1491-Map.jpg

Map of the United Kingdoms in 1491 showing the height of Carolingian power in the Continent.

It is perhaps telling that Shakespeare chose to end his history of Charles II with this diplomatic triumph:

Francois: O, what envenom'd gift the Moirae give;
This matter of Britain! May God forgive
Human frailty; I, no Meriadoc
Indeed, say but a kestrel to his hawk
Can'st not eke out another Nominoe.
Gloat, sir; here you have Bretagne brought low.

[Francois kneels]

Charles: I fear my intentions have gone awry:
Stand! No hawk, sir, but a tercel see I,
Fitting for John, who painted Richmond red
And won a county; My lord, have no dread,
No black poison shines this gift's golden hue
Of opportunity to bid adieu
To the matter of France! May God forgive
Human pride; Disparate, we are captive
To the fates. United, six make a fasces
That cannot break! Hesitation betrays
That noble dream. Swear and be king in Nantes
Or wait, while another awaits detente.

Francois: Honeyed words, majesty, but not untrue.
By vowing, my daughter's birthright accrues
And tho' Bretagne fade to Brittany
Her marriage bed a better jubilee
Than a bier! Generations of pure gold
Can satisfy silver centuries old.
I swear! I am your man, and you high king
Of all the Celts. Let Armorica sing!

Charles II, Act V, Scene V, 201-26

Cole's Notes: In this last scene Charles persuades the reluctant king Francois of Brittany to swear fealty to him.

Francois first curses the fates (Gk. Moirae) for forcing him to surrender to the English, one of the two principal enemies of Brittany, then compares his own defeat against the British to Conan Meriadoc's legendary victory over the French in the 9th century in the battle of Nominoe which established Breton independence.

Charles proceeds to turn Francois' speech against him; instead of a kestrel (a servant's bird), Charles compares him to a tercel (a king's falcon) and suggests Francois compare his situation to John the Red, who was born of a union between the Duchess of Brittany and the Earl of Richmond and ended up lord of both domains. The tacit promise in this stanza is that Francois' only child Mathilda will have children who rule over both England and Brittany. Charles also suggests that France is the real enemy, just waiting for the chance to conquer Brittany, and that by allying themselves with England they can defy the fates and retain their autonomy. The fasces metaphor is another Roman symbol - the bundle of sticks carried by consuls - that Charles uses to make his point. The six are, of course, the six Celtic nations of Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Brittany, Cornwall and the Isle of Man.

After hearing all these arguments, Francois gives in and agrees that his daughter Mathilda will marry Charles' son Frederick, uniting the two nations at some future date. He believes that these grandchildren (the generations of 'pure gold') will be enough to prevent an uprising in Brittany - the Armorica of Roman times - by suggesting it will honor his ancestors (the 'old silver'), coming back a final time to Shakespeare's precious metal metaphor.


The United Kingdoms at a Glance in 1491

Treasury: 73 million ducats
Estimated GDP: 398.4 million ducats
Standing Army: 18,000 Landsknechten and 9,000 knights
Reserves: 13,000
Royal Navy: 9 small ships and 6 transports
Prestige: 3rd highest (93.1)
Reputation: Slightly Tarnished (3.32/23)
 
Last edited:
Great update dharper. Really cool to see that you have pushed back onto the continent.

You will have to worry about France constantly re-invading your lands though.
 
How large is your fleet at this point?
 
Fulcrumvale said:
How large is your fleet at this point?
Still fairly small - 18 ships, about half of which are caravels. That by itself is a major change...after the defeat of the navy in this chapter I decided against cheaper, smaller ships and began building more capital ships. You'll get to see them in action in the next update. Will they be strong enough to defeat the French navy and its admirals?
BBBD316 said:
You will have to worry about France constantly re-invading your lands though.
Well, that's why I didn't ally with Brittany, only guaranteed its independence. That strategy didn't work as well as I hoped, though...I underestimated the tenacity of the French.
 
nette001 said:
Is your caption under the map of 1491 "a shape of things to come"?

Obviously... ;)

Great update again. :) Loved the 'False War' part.
 
"Oh, no," he coyly remonstarted. "I'm no ferret. I have a very different playing style........."

Britain by 1477! Ireland conquered! Brittany subdued!

You are a ferret in caribou's clothing, my friend. :cool:
 
What is the situation between Burgundy and France at this time?

Joe
 
I have finally caught up with the AAR again and must say good show! Creating the United Kingdom in the late 15th century is quite an interesting achievement. Your reentry into Europe also promises an interesting development for the future.

~Lord Valentine~
 
isca said:
"Oh, no," he coyly remonstarted. "I'm no ferret. I have a very different playing style........."

Britain by 1477! Ireland conquered! Brittany subdued!

You are a ferret in caribou's clothing, my friend. :cool:
What can I say? I enjoy roleplaying my games. Scotland was self-defense! And Great Britain was a total fluke that I thought I worked into the game quite well. :)

Honestly, I had no interest in France when I began my game...

nette001 said:
Is your caption under the map of 1491 "a shape of things to come"?
I have a bad habit of giving people hints...but I also like to use the truth to misdirect. You'll soon see what I mean!

cohort said:
My experience with the dastardly French navy was not particularly pleasant. So send it to the bottom for me!
Funny you should mention the French navy...they feature quite prominently in the next chapter...

Storey said:
What is the situation between Burgundy and France at this time?
Cordial neighbors. No hint of animosity between them from day 1. I'm not sure why Burgundy ended up without allies.

Lord Valentine said:
Creating the United Kingdom in the late 15th century is quite an interesting achievement.
I wish I could take credit for it, but it was just a fluke! Incidentally, it actually messed up my game somewhat - Pierre-luc (the writer of the events) never expected England to become Great Britain during the War of the Roses, so none of the WotR events fired after that...including the one ending the war and taking away the bad modifiers. I suffered with them until 1500 when I manually triggered the end of the war. :eek: Methinks a minor tweak is needed for Magna Mundi. :D

Gigalocus said:
loving this AAR and waiting for some expansion over the Seas!
Since I'm using Magna Mundi exploration is handled a little differently than most games - but don't worry, England gets some historical exploration and I'm hoping to have a much bigger overseas empire than they did when my game ends!
 
ubik said:
Good read!

What's your reputation right now?
I've added some stats to the end of each of my chapters, although I don't have a save game in 1453 so my information is slightly off for chapter 1. My reputation in 1491 was "Slightly Tarnished", 3.91/23. I don't think I've ever let it grow higher than 7. :)
 
dharper said:
I've added some stats to the end of each of my chapters, although I don't have a save game in 1453 so my information is slightly off for chapter 1. My reputation in 1491 was "Slightly Tarnished", 3.91/23. I don't think I've ever let it grow higher than 7. :)

are you still continueing this with version 3, i hope so! Or, has propaganda got me and saves are compatible?
 
Great AAR! Had not noticed it until today :)
 
Gigalocus said:
are you still continueing this with version 3, i hope so! Or, has propaganda got me and saves are compatible?
I'm continuing with version 3...which makes three different versions of Magna Mundi on my hard drive...

Wetew said:
Great AAR! Had not noticed it until today
Thanks! Updating again today. :)
 
V. Ambitions

York's Gambit

The British victory of 1491 is often dismissed as symbolic. Despite winning promises of fealty from a captive Francois, Brittany remained largely independent, and the looming spectre of nearby France ensured that it would remain so indefinitely. To see the Treaty of London as a "Lost Opportunity", as did many Briton lords, is still a common misperception. Charles II was overjoyed at the treaty, as well he might be.

Although few regarded Brittany as an equal to the Kingdoms, the war was distinctly one-sided, and the fighting over quickly. The United Kingdoms had shown that it could project its power beyond the British isles and staked a claim on the continent. It was a much-needed victory for Charles, with all that entailed: parades in London, medals for the troops, and promotion of officers. Charles was particularly fond of pomp and pageant, a passion which many commoners shared. By 1491, he had won over much of Europe with his charm.

1491-Status.jpg

the United Kingdoms were, for the first time in generations, the toast of Europe

King Charles was no strategist the equal of his ancestor Henry V, but he once again showed tact and wisdom in choosing his officers. He encouraged his generals to try new tactics and rewarded those who succeeded; during the wars he promoted a number of men to positions of power, including one William Henry York, of the House of York. For his part in the war York was made General of the Armies of Scotland, the second-highest position below the king.

1490-Staff.jpg

Many of the more famous figures of this period got their start in the War of British Unification

Charles idolized York, and for good reason. William Henry York was undoubtably the finest general of his generation in the United Kingdoms - dynamic, innovative and courageous, a shrewd judge of men and merciless when the situation called for it. He was also a handsome young man popular with the ladies, and many considered him the equal of his infamous cousin Richard. Like Charles, he was idealistic and convinced of the righteousness of his cause.

York is a bit of an enigma to historians. He was a Yorkist, but from a family that had chosen the Redemption, loyal to the Lancastrian on the throne. Charles once again showed generosity to his rivals by including him on his war councils, and there, it was a simple act for York to convince the king that another victory lay around the corner. Indeed, it seems clear that York had gained the confidence of the king earlier, and that his plans for France were what convinced Charles to bide patiently for the Treaty of London.

What is clear is that even before 1491 Charles and William were closeted together in London, making grandiose plans for an invasion of France. As soon as the war ended, York was sent off to Utrecht in command of 18,000 men, while Sir Archibald Norfolk was placed in command of 6,000 in Brittany. Since both Brittany and the Bishopric were neutral states, York and Norfolk could land troops there and invade France, retreating back behind neutral lines if need be. The launch of the HMS Vanguard, the eighth ship of the line in the British navy, helped secure the lines of resupply back to England, freeing up men for the offensive. With the support of another 20,000 Burgundians, the British would have a slight advantage over the French that Charles hoped to finesse into a return to the borders of 1419.

Preparations for the war were in full-swing in 1492, and even the news of an Italian explorer returning to Castille was overshadowed by the logistics effort. Preparations were complete by Christmas 1492 and the United Kingdoms formally declared war with the melting of the snow in March 1493.

The war got off to a rocky start when the faithless Burgundians chose to turn coat. Phillipe V of Burgundy had not been idle that winter; he had arranged alliances with both the Kingdoms and with France, and now he chose to support the stronger of the two, adding his men to those of Phillipe VII of France. This about-face immediately threw the plans for the war into chaos, and from the first shots fired it was clear that the aims of the war had to be scaled down considerably. Nevertheless, both York and Norfolk acted with aplomb by marching into northern France.

Predictably, Franco-Burgundian forces poured into the low countries to take Calais. Charles had given the local garrisons permission to surrender to the overwhelming enemy forces, and save for the town of Dunkirk, all did so in short order. Some 23,000 foot and 9,000 horse besieged the town, leaving Paris unguarded. This part of the plan was intact, and deciding to risk it, York and Norfolk sent their armies on a forced march into the enemy capital, now guarded by a mere 2,000 French soldiers under Bernard de la Brettonniere. Bernard had fled Brittany when it fell to the Kingdoms and joined the French; now he suffered defeat a second time as the British forces overwhelmed his positions. Paris was now under siege.

A British victory was forestalled when Guillaime de Dumas led 15,000 Burgundians to the relief of the city. The battle gave time for another 6,000 French reinforcements to belatedly arrive, making it 29,000 Franco-Burgundians against only 13,000 British, even after York called in reinforcements of his own, lifting the siege of Normandy and Caux. Still hoping to take Paris, York dug in stubbornly and the battle quickly became the bloodiest engagement of the war.

1493-Paris.jpg

The battle of Paris, 1493

Far from being the "quick, sure victory" that York had promised, the battle was to bloody the nose of both sides, leaving one in three combatants on both sides dead before York gave up the field to de Dumas. The news from Calais had broken the spirit of the men, no matter how much he tried to cajole them into another charge. There, in the low countries, king Phillipe of France had finally crushed Dunkirk's resistance and his armies began marching back to Paris. With every passing day, a French victory came closer, and de Dumas knew it; his tactics wasted men but gained time. The British commander had once again proven his superior tactics but it was not his day.

The battle for Paris was decisive, but not in the way York had hoped it would be. The initial British victories on land were now reversed as French troops pushed Norfolk back into Normany and harassed York as he began a long, circuitous retreat towards Burgundy. Phillipe of Burgundy, having suffered so much to protect Paris, having not even won Calais, now withdrew his forces from the war. This gave York the opportunity to move his forces by sea into friendly Brittany.

British control of the channel was won in a quick, painless victory over a surprised Phillipe de la Porte who overconfidently awaited the British with the northern fleet. In one, decisive battle French naval superiority was lost in the north.

1493-Channel.jpg

The battle of the channel, 1493

Sir Jeremy Herbert took full credit for the smashing victory, having proven his chops as an aggressive seawolf, just the kind of man Britain needed, but alas, only one man. Britain had far more talent in its army than they had in the navy, and the royal navy was still woefully underfunded thanks to Charles' territorial ambitions.

Caught off-guard by these double losses, Phillipe of France was forced to sit and begin diplomatic overtures with Phillipe of Burgundy to bring home the 30,000 troops left in Calais. Sensing defeat, their remaining ally Norway also exited the war. Once again, York and Norfolk marched into Normany, hoping to defeat the French with their limited numbers there. But France was far from finished.

Encirclement

1494 marked a marked change in the war strategy. By then Charles was deeply mistrustful of York, and being far from court, York had lost the king's favor to others. Many whispered about the close relations York's family had always had with the Burgundians, and about Burgundy's betrayal of England. Others mentioned the Yorkist ambitions to the throne, never wholly dismissed by them. The worst of all, however, was the simple fact that York had failed. Although the Kingdoms could eke out a narrow victory, any hope of dealing a profound blow to Phillipe had been already lost, and now men were dying over a point of honor.

In London, Charles II was overjoyed by the news of Herbert's victory in the channel, and he began to realize that Britain's greatest strength lay in its navy. Beginning that year, Charles ordered Herbert to split the British navy and encircle France, strangling its trade and forcing it to an economic defeat. To this end he arranged treaties with both Castille and Aragon to resupply the British ships circling the penninsula, and with Navarre to maintain supplies with the British ships anchored off Aquitaine.

French warships along the coast were brutally overwhelmed by the titanic British navy as it moved south, then west, cutting off the few French ships carrying troops to Ireland. None made it there alive. As the British navy moved southwards, however, it grew smaller as Herbert assigned flotillas to embargo the coast. By October that year, Herbert was finally positioned to attack the southern French fleet in Lyons. Led by du Valentinois, the French threw everything they had into that one battle, while Herbert's forces were weakened by the encirclement.

The cote d'azur was stormy that night, and the two fleets met unexpectedly around mid-morning. The battle that ensued lasted into the next day, but in the end Herbert chased off the surviving French warships. With several of his ships taking on water, Herbert sailed back to Barcelona for repairs. When news of the battle arrived in London, Charles furiously sent orders for Herbert's replacement and gave Lord Syndey Howard command of the British navy. He sailed from London with a flotilla to support the assault on Lyons, and together the two admirals defeated the southern fleet decisively and blockaded Lyons. The French were now completely encircled.

1495-Encirclement.jpg

The British strategy of encirclement

England's Rose

British celebration of the victory at sea was characteristically muted by news from ashore: in November the two Phillipes managed to work out a treaty whereby the stranded French troops returned home to once again chase the British out of Normandy. Having learned from their mistakes, the French guarded the border carefully, and York never again attempted to march east. His gambit failed, his name in disrepute, York returned to London a broken man, where he died in 1500.

Many have compared this last failure to the straw that broke the camel's back: the United Kingdoms had grown into an empire where England and its nobility no longer enjoyed complete preeminence; the House of York had been split into two rival camps; the king enjoyed the blessing of the pope; their ally Burgundy was now supporting the French; and now their rising new star had been cast aside. Whatever caused it, one thing was clear: the rose of York would not bloom in London. The War of the Roses was over.

For the next several years the war took place entirely on the waves. Although the British enjoyed superiority, they were stretched to their limit, while France could attack at any point that seemed weak. The Royal Navy rose to the challenge and won every engagement. Few ships reached French ports, and fewer left again.

By 1497 France was growing desperate. Their economy was in ruins, their navy in tatters, and their people ready to revolt. The young, brilliant Louis XIV had won the war on the continent but had little to show for it. Where time had been against York in Paris, it was against Louis in the channel. France was spending ducats it didn't have to build ships and finance privateers, only to see them turned against them by the canny British. In the end, Louis despaired of victory, just as Charles had before him. In November of that year the Treaty of Rome was signed by both sides. The French agreed to pay reparations to the British, return to the 1492 borders and recognize British control of Brittany; the British now allied with Brittany for the first time. The British agreed to stop hunting French ships and remove the bulk of their forces back to Britain. Although it was far from the complete victory Charles had dreamt of, it was something unheard of since 1419: a victory over France.

1497-Treaty.jpg

The treaty of Rome was largely symbolic, but an English victory nonetheless

With the end of the war, Lord Howard held a grand ceremony in which several older ships were taken out of service, leaving the Royal Navy a thoroughly modern fleet of carracks and barques.

There were no parades for the Royal Army in 1497.

A New Game

Burgundy had proven a false friend to Britain. Not only had they turned against the Kingdoms in the war, but even after signing peace with Britain they had continued to give letters of marque to privateers preying on British shipping. Charles was furious with them but impotent to do anything about it. With a strong, aggressive Burgundy against them, there seemed no hope of regaining his patrimony in France.

It was thus fortuitous timing for Edward Cabot when he broached the subject of a royal expedition to the Atlantic. By 1499 news of one Columbus' journey had electrified Europe, and although the pope had divided the new world he had discovered between Castille and Portugal, Cabot offered to lead an expedition to map the new world and place Britain's flag there. Little did anyone suspect how vast the new world would be and how futile his dreams of encircling it! Nevertheless, he captured Charles' imagination, and, typical of Carolingian London, that was all that mattered. It did not hurt that news arrived almost simultaneously that France had sponsored an explorer of their own. The race was on!

1499-America.jpg

Cabot's Expedition

Embittered about the continent, Charles was caught up in the dream of exploration and heaped royal funds on Cabot's expedition. He was rewarded with a few rough maps of some coastline and a few captive natives who called themselves the Powhattan. Charles was nevertheless overjoyed and immediately sponsored a trading colony. Fort Charleston was promptly built, named after the king who discovered the Americas for Britain.

Alas, the planned colony of Charleston did not survive the harsh winter of the Americas. In spring news returned that a ship had reached the colony only to find it abandoned. The fate of that mysterious, doomed colony is still a mystery. If the men starved to death, where were their bodies? Were they attacked by natives, as some suggest? Or were they adopted by them? Whatever the case, they were gone by 1500.

Undeterred, Charles sponsored a second trading post, this time under the command of Giorgio Vivaldi, an Italian. With this beachhead in the new world, Charles sent over a small contingent of soldiers to stake his claim there. This second settlement proved more resilient, and over the next five years the colony grew considerably.

1499-NewEngland.jpg

The site of New England

That year, Burgundy became a kingdom, and Charles gnashed his teeth at the news.

With the death of the pope in 1501, Charles once again interfered in the papal conclaves, ensuring a pious man who would push through his idealistic notions of Sublimus Dei - that the natives had souls and should not be enslaved, much to the annoyance of his allies in Lisbon. That pope did not live long enough to make much of a difference, however.

The following year, Portugal dissolved into civil war, and ceased their colonization of Brazil. The Portugese civil war was to last from 1502 to 1505, and many in London were uneasy, for the Portuguese had long been the most trustworthy and valued of Britain's allies. It was during this time that Charles reached out to Brittany and encouraged them to become part of the realm; now that war with France was no longer in the future, he felt it time to coax them towards the United Kingdoms. In 1504, they accepted, creating the true empire of Celts and Saxons, united at last. French armies immediately surrounded the little Breton kingdom:

1504-Brittany.jpg

Brittany became the fourth kingdom (and fifth member) of the United Kingdoms in 1504

1505-Brittany.jpg

One small village of the indomitable Gauls still holds out against the Romans...wait, wrong series

In 1506 Charles II died, having spent thirty years on the throne. He has been called "the idealist," "the dreamer," "the knight," but most of all, "the Great." He was loved by his subjects, and in return he loved them. He rarely had harsh words, except for failure, which in the end he always forgave. He was a pious Catholic and a favorite of the pope and a generous man who, in his own lifetime, turned England into the United Kingdoms of England, Scotland, Ireland, Brittany and Wales, and gained acceptance by Europe as a power. During his reign England became stable again, won wars, and put the War of the Roses to rest. In many ways, Charles was unique among British monarchs. His like would not be seen again...certainly not in his son's lifetime.

Was he a visionary or tilting at windmills? It is hard to say. A lesser man could easily have brought England to ruin; Charles II left England the greater for his life. But his costly, long wars retarded the wealth of the nation and distracted him from other pursuits. Perhaps it is fitting that Shakespeare's Charles II, written for his descendant almost a hundred years after Charles' reign, ends as Francois bends knee to Charles, at the height of his power - and the beginnings of his ambitions.

The United Kingdoms at a Glance in 1506

Treasury: 163 million ducats
Estimated GDP: 523.2 million ducats
Standing Army: 24,000 Landsknechten and 10,000 knights
Reserves: 16,000
Royal Navy: 11 caravels, 3 small ships and 3 transports
Prestige: 2nd highest (79.5)
Reputation: Slightly Tarnished (1.87/18)
 
Last edited:
I wonder what chaos the Reformation will bring?