• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Just discovered that the Hermann Goering is outfitted with 25-plane biplane CAGs. Matter of fact, ALL my carriers are sportin' 25-plane biplane CAGs, which is a little frustrating after writing about ooh-look-Messerschmitt-VG-CAGs! Looks like it's time for a savegame edit soon as autosave rolls around.

EDIT:

But first, a teaser, since the 1950s are going to be a game-screen-poor decade...

800px-Leopard1_Bundeswehr_1983.jpg

The Reichsheer's answer to the ATGM
 
Last edited:
FAIIILLLL! Lol dude

Wouldn't be so bad, except that I checked the models of CAG I built with those carriers, and they were definitely not 25-plane biplane CAGs. Not at all happy about that one.
 
I enjoyed the naval update, but I do find the idea of anti-submarine helicopters to be strange. I can't really picture that in my head.

Let me assist you.

JRM_Kamov_Ka-25.jpg

Kamov Ka-25 "Hormone," progenitor of the Soviet line of shipborne ASW helicopters

800px-AdmiralVinogradov2009.jpg

A Russian Udaloy-class ASW destroyer. Note the Kamov parked on the stern.

800px-SH3H_HS15_CVW15_1995.JPEG

Flight of SH-3 "Sea King" helicopters, the 1980s US/Canadian/British common ASW helicopter

800px-MH-60R.jpg

SH-60 "Seahawk" deploying sonar probe.

800px-US_Navy_040326-N-6433N-104_An_MH-60S_Knighthawk_delivers_cargo_to_the_guided_missile_destroyer_USS_Bulkeley_%28DDG_84%29_during_a_replenishment_at_sea_%28RAS%29.jpg

Arleigh Burke-class doing replenishment at sea; note the Seahawk parked on the stern deck.

When you can hover, drop a sonar unit in the water, and take a reading from a fixed position, or use a magnetic anomaly detector while flying, you have a bit of an edge. The development of stand-off ASW munitions helps, but that's in the future.

This is actually what the Kriegsmarine was interested in Flettner's design in real life for. Focke-Achgelis developed a one-man helicopter to be towed from submarines as a spotting craft, to present the other side. And let's not even get into the Japanese aircraft-carrying I-boats.
 
5. The Domino Effect

At the beginning of the second half of the 1950s, the upper leadership of the Reich realized that they faced a problem. The Fuehrer had directed that the peacetime Reichswehr be no more than ten percent of Germany's population, a figure which Luftwaffe and Reichsmarine had no problem meeting, but that the Reichsheer and Waffen-SS found made their continued expansion all but impossible. The total armed strength of the Reichswehr was roughly thirty million men in arms in all services, a figure made possible by the work of organizations like KdF and the Todt Bureau streamlining labor within the Reich. Even so, the mass of the Reichswehr was placing a strain on Germany's economy.

This economy was nearing the completion of an ambitious expansion similar to that of the 1930s, fully exploiting the newly settled eastern regions. However, the completion of the expansion itself was creating problems of employment. There was no clear solution to this problem, creating the recession of 1956. Unemployment, kept historically low by work programs dictated from Berlin, reached upwards of 10% as these programs were completed. The great shipyards at Kiel, Hamburg, and Bremen were currently idle, due to the Reichsmarine's current stasis and the dearth of trans-Atlantic travel.

Within the Reichswehr, this period of ennui was marked by the commissioning and completion of the Steiner Report, written by SS-Hauptgruppenfuehrer and Field Marshal Felix Steiner. The Steiner Report, commissioned by Reichsmarschall Hausser and written with the active cooperation of all of the Reichswehr's branches, took from 1954 to 1956 to complete. Its conclusions were, by branch:

1. The Luftwaffe was suffering a critical officer shortage; however, because there was no sign that the United States, China, or Japan had a jet air program, let alone a supersonic capability, it was likely that continuing with routine updating would maintain the Luftwaffe's primacy. The weakest links in the Luftwaffe were its cooperation with the Reichsmarine, which had in the early 1950s claimed control over all aircraft operating in a naval role, and the airborne units' transports.

2. The Reichsmarine, while vast and well-armed, was burdened with a great number of mid-1930s ships, especially in the carrier fleet. The Bismarck-class battleships were more than capable of holding their own; the same could no longer be said for the Hipper-class cruiser, the Graf Zeppelin-class carrier, or the majority of the destroyer-frigate fleet. Steiner, with Ramcke, argued for the transformation of the Zeppelin fleet into ships meant to support amphibious operations and the class's replacement in service with a new, updated carrier similar to the Goering class.

3. The Reichsheer and Waffen-SS were equipped to fight the British campaign. After almost a decade, they had seen no substantial updates of equipment or training. Developments in rocketry and materials science had rendered much of the Reichsheer inventory obsolete, and the Standardpanzer design was starting to show its age rather badly. In response, Steiner argued for an across-the-board update of the Reichswehr's land forces, including both parachutists and marine troops, though giving priority to the armored and mechanized forces.

DrawImage.asp

Figure 119: Paraguayan troops during Battle of Corrientes, February 1956

At the same time, a school of warfare inspired by the Afghanistan intervention and spearheaded by SS-Gruppenfuehrer Otto Skorzeny was developing. The so-called "Training Group South America" (Lehrgruppe Südamerika - trans.) formed in mid-1955 to help train Argentinean and Uruguayan allies. It consisted of veterans of the Afghanistan conflict and contained some of the best-trained soldiers in the Reichswehr, led by Skorzeny. Skorzeny, unusually for a commander operating in the field, had orders from the Foreign Ministry, essentially giving him a free hand so long as the Americans were not provoked into an open war. It was the beginning of the "domino theory" period of relations between Germany and the United States.

In February 1956, therefore, the Argentinean military began a series of operations, starting with "Gabriela," the invasion of Paraguay. The goal of these operations was to shore up Argentine control of the south end of South America, from whence operations could be launched against the American-dominated north end of the continent when the inevitable conflict began. The Paraguayans were a simple matter, equipped and trained as they were primarily with American cast-offs from the 1930s. Skorzeny himself spent most of the war vacationing in Germany, though when he returned to Buenos Aires, he was presented with the first rifle captured at Corrientes - an 1891 Chilean Mauser.

German commitment to Argentina escalated steadily through 1956 - by mid-March, Luftwaffe Lieutenant-General Hans-Ulrich Rudel had arrived in Buenos Aires with a bomber wing, and the first German divisions (an SS marine corps and Ramcke's three provisional air-mobile marine divisions) were dispatched about the same time. By the end of March, 1956, seventy thousand German troops were on the ground in South America; by the end of May, it would be more than a hundred thousand as Skorzeny asked for, and got, a full-scale field command. The German commitment was deeper than just training or even troop deployment - the Reich began to sell its old Type IX U-Boat hulls to the Argentines in March as well, a way to strengthen its ally's interest in submarines while at the same time clearing the way for new construction at the great yards in northern Germany. Almost by accident, it seemed, an answer for the Steiner Report had been found.

il-28-83p01.jpg

Figure 120: A "Blitz" bomber during ferry operations to the Argentine Front

Rudel's air offensive in Paraguay was the first test of Germany's jet air force against a foreign force; because of this, Luftwaffe commanders ordered him into immediate action without any chance to recover. He was generally seen as an adequate officer, though not outstanding, and personally viewed the South American commitment as a chance to advance himself. As a result, his aircraft were pushed to their limits with constant operations. They were rewarded: after the collapse of Paraguay, debriefing interviews consistently emphasized how the Paraguayan army feared the jets that would seemingly appear from nowhere, against which they were powerless. The Reich's policy of using South America as an extended proving ground was working.

On March 13, 1956, the Argentine military occupied Asuncion and the Paraguayan government collapsed. It would be the first of several Argentine acquisitions in the 1950s, but the Fuehrer contented himself with a telegram of congratulations and a caution not to push the matter any further until German reinforcements could arrive - not that he was afraid the Argentines would lose without support, but because Germany's soldiers needed blooding again. Caudillo Carlos Alberto Pueyrredon, who knew quite well why he was Argentina's leader, quickly assented. The German buildup was not long in coming.

Fallschirmj-net

Figure 121: Military police of Skorzeny's airborne command, laying out the German compound outside Buenos Aires, April 1956

Skorzeny was one of the new "helicopter generals," a proponent of any tool that would allow his infantry to move faster than any enemy could expect. As a result, his operations in South America attracted a different school of commander from those found throughout much of the Reichswehr. They tended to be younger, men who had risen as far as they could in the peacetime military and who were generally unproven in combat - though they included some wartime stalwarts like Michael Wittmann, now an SS-Gruppenfuehrer in command of a helicopter-equipped division.

Thus, the fact that he had the equivalent of an army group at his disposal for operations in South America did not particularly engender confidence in Skorzeny's superiors. His subordinates and equipment were untested, made of raw divisions whose loss to the Reichswehr could be met with a shrug, aside from Rudel's air force, and they were hardly in danger from the operations planned. Skorzeny's plan, in broad strokes, was to unify the southern half of South America under Argentine leadership, then destabilize the governments to the north. Paraguay had been the first phase, but the Paraguayan military had been equipped to fight at the Marne, not on the modern battlefield. Chile's military was somewhat more respectable. In addition to their equipment - almost modern, by South American definitions - they were positioned along an excellent natural fortification line in the Andes Mountains, terrain particularly unsuited for helicopter operations. Chile would, therefore, be the great test of the Reich's new weapon.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-R81453%2C_SS-Obersturmbannf%C3%BChrer_Otto_Skorzeny_an_der_Oder_retouched.jpg

Figure 122: Skorzeny conducting an informal inspection of his troops, unknown site, Andes frontier, 1956. Note the rank; Skorzeny typically pretended to be a mid-ranking officer to throw off opposition

Finally, in late June, 1956, Skorzeny felt ready, and ordered the invasion of Chile. Argentine troops were not notified of the order - Skorzeny had very little respect for the Argentine military which he was supposed to be training. "Whatever we don't finish with," Wittmann recalls him as saying, "the Buenos Aires polo league will deal with." The helicopters received their first test from June 20 to June 22, 1956, in the highlands above Puerto Aisen. In a bitter, windy cold, Skorzeny's troops engaged the Chilean defenders along the border, and in a period of two days, seven Chilean divisions disintegrated; only the regional headquarters was able to flee the German advance. To the north, the Argentine military broke through at Antofagasta at the same time, surprising Skorzeny with their performance.

Perhaps the weapon which received the most resounding praise was the jet bomber. Chile had no air force to speak of, so Lieutenant-General Rudel's main enemies were weather and terrain. The Arado bombers experienced minimal losses over the Andes, and Rudel himself was praised extensively both by Skorzeny and the Argentine military, leading to his promotion to General der Flieger on the 24th. Rudel himself found out about the promotion upon return from a raid on Chilean positions at Puerto Montt, where Skorzeny's troops were attempting to envelop the Chilean capital at Santiago. Rudel, a notorious teetotaller, celebrated by ordering the disbursement of one bottle of champagne to each of the bombers under his command - tucked into the payload, "so the Chilies could celebrate too," as one of his pilots later recalled.

Skorzeny's own promotion followed. Word reached him on the 27th, as his lead units secured Puerto Montt. He was the first to hold the rank of Obergruppenfuehrer und General der Jagdtruppen, a distinction that showed the difference between the new, lightly armed and highly mobile school of infantry warfare which he was developing and the older infantry tradition of the Reichsheer. The promotion immediately preceded the beginning of his advance on Santiago de Chile, in the hopes of ending the war. Unfortunately, Skorzeny's men were stretched to their limits, as were Wittmann and von Huenersdorff's divisions at the southern end of the line. By the end of June, 1956, it was obvious to all concerned that the Chilean offensive had ground to a halt. Equally obvious, to a broader world audience, was German involvement in the Andean campaign. The Fuehrer therefore authorized escalation - first in the form of Luftwaffe intervention, then ordering Field Marshal von Witzleben to the South American command. Von Witzleben had established a reputation as a mountain warfare expert in Scotland, and was well-known for his aggressive, hard-nosed approach to warfare. He was hardly one of the Fuehrer's favorite marshals, but was generally viewed as intensely competent and ideally suited to this mission. Upon publication of these orders, the politically-minded Field Marshal von Bock used his rank and prestige to steal a march on von Witzleben, boarding transports and speeding down the English Channel before von Witzleben was out of cantonments.

Von Huenersdorff and Wittmann fought a desperate winter defense of Puerto Aisen on Chile's west coast, a move which meant that when they landed, von Bock's mechanized troops would already be on the west side of the Andes range and would be within immediate contact range of the Chilean defenders. To their north, Skorzeny and his command dug in south of Santiago, holding Puerto Montt open for von Witzleben's arrival. The German infantry along the Chilean salient all prepared for a prolonged campaign. Only the Luftwaffe continued active offensive operations. The new air commander for South America was Field Marshal Kesselring, assisted by Lieutenant-General Wolfram von Richtofen, who was widely viewed as the ailing Sperrle's natural successor in the strategic bomber command.

777px-Wesel_1945.jpg

Figure 123: City center of Antofagosta after Luftwaffe raid of July 4, 1956

Chile was, in fact, the first test of the strategic bomber forces. Under General von Richtofen, they began bombing Chile's industrialized north almost immediately after deployment. A 50% reduction in Chilean industrial production was reported after their first raids. Von Richtofen wrote to Berlin in frustration over the lack of targets: "I am bombing everywhere that my scouts spot a llama. I see no point in wasting munitions thus, and wish for more productive employment for my aircraft." To the south, Rudel continued his aerial harassment of Chilean forces, developing a technique called the "Rudelschlacht" - close contact between Skorzeny and Rudel allowed him to fly at exceptionally low altitudes to approach the battlefield, and to place his bombs and rockets precisely where he wanted them.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1970-033-04%2C_Russland%2C_Kaukasus%2C_Gebirgsj%C3%A4ger.jpg

Figure 124: Mountain guns begin an artillery barrage during Skorzeny's second push into Santiago

Word took longer to reach Skorzeny than anticipated; he hated the thought of losing his autonomy to what he viewed as tradition-bound marshals loyal first to Berlin, second to their own soldiers. As a result, he gathered his commanders in mid-July to ask their opinions: could their units sustain an assault on Santiago? The answer was generally dubious, but favorable, and thus on July 10, he launched a broad, ad-hoc offensive against the city's defenses once more, catching the Chileans off-guard with the sudden thrust. There was no real sense of planning, and indeed no staff orders survive which indicate that anything more than a general order to draw grenades and advance wherever possible was given. Two days of grinding combat followed; Chilean defenders stood their ground bravely, even foolishly, in the face of Skorzeny's attacks, but finally they collapsed under the combined weight of the enemy to their front and the Luftwaffe above.

On July 21, 1956, General der Jagdtruppen Otto Skorzeny arrived in a small truck at the city center of Santiago de Chile. He immediately sent a message to Berlin, for forwarding to Bock and von Witzleben, that typified his attitude towards the existing military establishment: "Dance card full, no room for old ladies." The marshals, furious though they were, saw little recourse but to turn back to the Dutch harbors from whence they had departed. Late in the day, the Argentine and Chilean governments came to an agreement - the two countries were to be permanently united.

southam56.png

Figure 124: South America after the Chilean War, 1956

As a result of the conflict in South America, relations between Germany and the United States began to disintegrate once more. President Eisenhower made the most cogent statement of the American view, which failed to take into account his own country's rampant interventionism in the region, at a press conference on August 15, 1956:

Finally, you have broader considerations that might follow what you would call the "falling domino" principle. You have a row of dominoes set up, you knock over the first one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will go over very quickly. So you could have a beginning of a disintegration that would have the most profound influences.

The German economy, meanwhile, was being slowly, painfully restarted. The Fuehrer authorized a series of massive construction projects to provide air and sea access to regions previously out of contact with the world, to extend the Reich's meteorology service throughout the occupied territories, and to complete those packets of Autobahn not yet completed. At the same time, the companies upon which the Reich's production rested went through a period of self-examination, led by efficiency experts at IG Farben and Siemens. By the end of 1956, it was confidently predicted that better than 10% time and personnel savings could be found in all aspects of Reich production. The shipyards, left idle with the Reichsmarine out of its growth phase, were instead tasked to build the world's greatest shipping fleet, and to build a coast guard to protect it. Finally, the engineers at Krupp of Essen were putting the final touches on an answer to the Steiner Report's concerns about the Reichsheer's armored component. Production and testing came to a sudden halt in late November when it was discovered that one of the Krupp engineers had been an American agent, and had deliberately sabotaged the armor thickness calculations. The resulting chill in German-American relations was exacerbated by the sudden, unexpected death of Henry Kaiser, Eisenhower's industrial advisor.

800px-Leopard_Vorserie_Prototyp_II.jpg

Figure 125: The final pre-production prototype of the PzKpfW-60 "Leopard"

All of this answered the Steiner Report and the general malaise of the German economy in early 1956 quite well, but it neglected the lessons learned in the Chilean war. This is not to say those lessons were universally neglected; quite the contrary, even during the war the Luftwaffe put considerable effort into beginning the modernization of its ground-attack forces. There is some evidence, albeit anecdotal, that General Rudel had already begun experimenting with ad-hoc terrain-following instrumentation, adapting the early-war radar beam guidance systems to his aircraft to facilitate the so-called "Rudelschlacht." Certainly the Luftwaffe put more immediate interest into the exploitation of Chile's lessons than the Reichsheer, which for the moment all but cashiered Skorzeny for stealing the marshals' glory in Santiago.

Skorzeny, with both bitterness and justification, accused the Reichsheer and Waffen-SS of preparing to fight the last war again. Despite the Fuehrer's preference for the unpredictable young man whose service had started in the Austrian SS, public insubordination of this scale was too much for Reichsmarschall Hausser. Only the intercession of Hauptgruppenfuehrer Dietrich of the Leibstandarte saved him from an honor court; Skorzeny instead found himself languishing as the commandant of the Sepp-Dietrich-Schule at Berlin-Lichterfelde. It was perhaps not the best appointment to dispose of an inconveniently outspoken commander; instead, most of the junior officers of the Waffen-SS throughout the 1960s bore Skorzeny's imprimatur.

Uss_belleau_wood_cvl-24.jpg

Figure 126: The rebuilt Graf Zeppelin as an amphibious assault ship, early 1960s

Ironically, given Doenitz's almost total disregard for the surface fleet, it was the Reichsmarine which absorbed the most from Chile. Ramcke perused the reports thoroughly and drew the conclusion that amphibious operations would benefit tremendously from the helicopter, and asked Admiral Doenitz for permission to use the old Graf Zeppelin as a testing and development ship. Doenitz agreed readily enough, saying that it would be a torpedo target otherwise - it might as well be put to use. Ramcke began by converting the ship's flight deck, extending it and hardening it to accommodate vertical landings, and transforming much of its belowdeck space to accommodate a marine battalion. The project, undertaken in November of 1956, quickly attracted the attention of survivors of the "Dutch School" of the early 1950s, who like most of the surface proponents were currently out of favor. They saw in the new helicopter carrier concept a way to extend their own influence and assist in protecting the Reich's commercial traffic from Doenitz's pet submarines, and thus a momentary alliance between surface admirals and amphibious generals was born in the face of the submarine-minded Doenitz.

1956 was the first year in which the Reich faced a serious military challenge, and many of the men who faced it found themselves sidelined as 1957 began. In the United States, paranoia over the "Gray Peril" deepened, and when, on January 1, 1957, the Hohenzollern pretender Ludwig Ferdinand was arrested by the Gestapo for his continued virulent anti-Party positions, the Americans took note. The Fuehrer, old and frail though he was, would brook no challenges.

----

Regarding the last paragraph, on January 1, '57, I got the "dissident minister" event for Wilhelm III. Problem is that he died in 1951. Louis Ferdinand was the next head of the Hohenzollerns. Given that spring break ends in a few days, I wonder if I'm going to make it to the '60s in a reasonable time. It's taking a week to play a year at Extremely Fast.
 
Helps some, but I think the fact that Germany disposes of 2500 divisions, 1260 ships, and 425 air squadrons, and Nationalist China has 3250 divisions, the United States has 1350 ships... you get the idea... anyway, I think that has more to do with it. The game is just a resource hog at this point.

EDIT - Oh, and Afghanistan has two submarines. Thought I'd share that one.
 
What the.... In my normal ARMA and now AOD games I never build more ~200 Divs, no matter who I play....
 
Yeah, weak point of the mod. To be competetive, you need thousand-division armies, because God knows the Chinese and Russians will spam them left and right. I tried a normal build scheme last time I tried an AAR, and it just didn't work. Wound up facing 75-division doomstacks of T-34s along the Polish frontier.
 
Wound up facing 75-division doomstacks of T-34s along the Polish frontier.

LOL! :rofl: Nothing beats running into Soviet and Chinese spams late in a HoI2 game! :cool:

Anyways, it looks like "Containment of Fascism" isn't working. Great update, it was awesome reading about the Cold War getting hot in South America and the doors that are now open because of what went on with Argentina and Chile and the other South American minors. Most excellent work! ;)
 
LOL! :rofl: Nothing beats running into Soviet and Chinese spams late in a HoI2 game! :cool:

No, that was an on-schedule Barbarossa.

Anyways, it looks like "Containment of Fascism" isn't working. Great update, it was awesome reading about the Cold War getting hot in South America and the doors that are now open because of what went on with Argentina and Chile and the other South American minors. Most excellent work! ;)

Problem is that most of South America is actually Allied. It's coup-spam time.
 
By the way, is what happening in South America an issue in America's '56 election?

Sorry, I missed this post completely. I'm midway into 1958 here (there's something special coming up on the techtree), so I can only look at '56 retroactively. Chile-Paraguay was important in the '56 election, where Eisenhower's military experience crushed Stephenson, who couldn't shake the "egghead" stigma. If it weren't an update-length post by itself, I've been considering rewriting the Long Telegram so that it reflects conditions in Berlin rather than Moscow, but it boils down to the same "you can't blink" logic. Things do take a nasty turn around Christmas of '57, I'll tell you that.

EDIT - And the junior senator from Massachusetts has had some choice things to say about German interventionism, based on his own wartime service in the '47-48 war...

EDIT2 - Oh, what the hell... (see following post)
 
Last edited:
Appendix A - Original Text of the Long Telegram, 1950

861.00/2 - 2246: Telegram
The Charge in Germany (Kennan) to the Secretary of State
SECRET
Berlin, February 22, 1950--9 p.m. [Received February 22--3: 52 p.m.]
511. Answer to Dept's 284, Feb 3 [13] involves questions so intricate, so delicate, so strange to our form of thought, and so important to analysis of our international environment that I cannot compress answers into single brief message without yielding to what I feel would be dangerous degree of over-simplification. I hope, therefore, Dept will bear with me if I submit in answer to this question five parts, subjects of which will be roughly as follows:

(1) Basic features of post-war German outlook.

(2) Background of this outlook

(3) Its projection in practical policy on official level.

(4) Its projection on unofficial level.

(5) Practical deductions from standpoint of US policy.

I apologize in advance for this burdening of telegraphic channel; but questions involved are of such urgent importance, particularly in view of recent events, that our answers to them, if they deserve attention at all, seem to me to deserve it at once. There follows:

Part 1: Basic Features of Post War German Outlook, as Put Forward by Official Propaganda Machine
Are as Follows:

(a) Germany seeks worldwide "living space" with which in the long run there can be no permanent peaceful coexistence. As stated by Hitler in his Obersalzberg speech of 1939:

"Our strength consists in our speed and in our brutality. Genghis Khan led millions of women and children to slaughter, with premeditation and a happy heart. History sees in him solely the founder of a state. It's a matter of indifference to me what a weak western European civilization will say about me. I have issued the command, and I'll have anybody who utters but one word of criticism executed by a firing squad, that our war aim does not consist in reaching certain lines, but in the physical destruction of the enemy. Accordingly, I have placed my death's-head formation in readiness, for the present only in the East, with orders to them to send to death mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish derivation and language. Only thus shall we gain the living space (Lebensraum) which we need. Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"

(b) Western world is beset with internal conflicts, inherent in nature of capitalist society. These conflicts are insoluble by means of peaceful compromise. Greatest of them is that between England and US.

(c) Internal conflicts inevitably generate wars. Wars thus generated may be of two kinds: wars between non-German states, and wars of intervention against National Socialist world. Smart Westerners, vainly seeking escape from inner conflicts of the West, incline toward latter.

(d) Intervention against Germany, while it would be disastrous to those who undertook it, would cause renewed delay in progress of National Socialism and must therefore be forestalled at all costs.

(e) Conflicts between Western states, though likewise fraught with danger for Germany, nevertheless hold out great possibilities for advancement of National Socialist cause, particularly if Germany remains militarily powerful, ideologically monolithic and faithful to its present brilliant leadership.

(f) It must be borne in mind that Western world is not all bad. In addition to hopelessly decadent and bourgeois elements, it includes (1) certain wholly enlightened and positive elements united in acceptable fascistic parties and (2) certain other elements (now described for tactical reasons as popular or nationalist) whose reactions, aspirations and activities happen to be "objectively" favorable to interests of Germany. These last must be encouraged and utilized for German purposes.

(g) Among negative elements of bourgeois-capitalist society, most dangerous of all are those whom Hitler called false friends of the people, namely socialist or centrist leaders. These are more dangerous than out-and-out revolutionaries, for latter at least march under their true colors, whereas moderate left-wing leaders confuse people by employing devices of socialism to seine interests of national and cultural forces.

So much for premises. To what deductions do they lead from standpoint of German policy? To following:

(a) Everything must be done to advance relative strength of Germany as factor in international society. Conversely, no opportunity must be missed to reduce strength and influence, collectively as well as individually, of capitalist powers.

(b) German efforts, and those of Germany's friends abroad, must be directed toward deepening and exploiting of differences and conflicts between capitalist powers. If these eventually deepen into an "imperialist" war, this war must be turned into popular upheavals within the various capitalist countries.

(c) "Populist-nationalist" elements abroad are to be utilized to maximum to bring pressure to bear on capitalist governments along lines agreeable to German interests.

(d) Relentless battle must be waged against Nazi and social-democratic leaders abroad.

Part 2: Background of Outlook
Before examining ramifications of this party line in practice there are certain aspects of it to which I wish to draw attention.

First, it does not represent natural outlook of German people. Latter are, by and large, friendly to outside world, eager for experience of it, eager to measure against it talents they are conscious of possessing, eager above all to live in peace and enjoy fruits of their own labor. Party line only represents thesis which official propaganda machine puts forward with great skill and persistence to a public often remarkably resistant in the stronghold of its innermost thoughts. But party line is binding for outlook and conduct of people who make up apparatus of power--party, secret police and Government--and it is exclusively with these that we have to deal.

Second, please note that premises on which this party line is based are for most part simply not true. Experience has shown that peaceful and mutually profitable coexistence of capitalist and National Socialist states is entirely possible. Basic internal conflicts in advanced countries are no longer primarily those arising out of capitalist ownership of means of production, but are ones arising from advanced urbanism and industrialism as such, which Germany has thus far been leading example of said trend. Internal rivalries of capitalism do not always generate wars; and not all wars are attributable to this cause. To speak of possibility of intervention against Germany today, after elimination of USSR and Italy and after example of recent war, is sheerest nonsense. If not provoked by forces of intolerance and subversion "capitalist" world of today is quite capable of living at peace with itself and with Germany. Finally, no sane person has reason to doubt sincerity of moderate socialist leaders in Western countries. Nor is it fair to deny success of their efforts to improve conditions for working population whenever, as in Brazil, they have been given chance to show what they could do.

Falseness of those premises, every one of which predates recent war, was amply demonstrated by that conflict itself Anglo-American differences did not turn out to be major differences of Western World. Capitalist countries, other than those of Allies, showed no disposition to solve their differences by joining in crusade against Germany.

Nevertheless, all these theses, however baseless and disproven, are being boldly put forward again today. What does this indicate? It indicates that German party line is not based on any objective analysis of situation beyond Germany's borders; that it has, indeed, little to do with conditions outside of Germany; that it arises mainly from basic inner-German necessities which existed before recent war and exist today.

At bottom of Bendlerblock's neurotic view of world affairs is traditional and instinctive German sense of insecurity. Originally, this was insecurity of a peaceful agricultural people trying to live on vast exposed plain in neighborhood of fierce nomadic peoples. To this was added, as Germany came into contact with economically advanced West, fear of more competent, more powerful, more highly organized societies in that area. But this latter type of insecurity was one which afflicted rather German rulers than German people; for German rulers have invariably sensed that their rule was relatively archaic in form fragile and artificial in its psychological foundation, unable to stand comparison or contact with political systems of Western countries. For this reason they have always feared foreign penetration, feared direct contact between Western world and their own, feared what would happen if Germans learned truth about world without or if foreigners learned truth about world within. And they have learned to seek security only in patient but deadly struggle for total destruction of rival power, never in compacts and compromises with it.

It was no coincidence that fascism, which had smoldered ineffectively for a quarter of a century in Western Europe, caught hold and blazed for first time in Germany. Only in this land which had never known any tolerant equilibrium of separate powers, either internal or international, could a doctrine thrive which viewed economic conflicts of society as insoluble by peaceful means. After establishment of National Socialist regime, Nazi dogma, rendered even more truculent and intolerant by Hitler's interpretation, became a perfect vehicle for sense of insecurity with which Nazis, even more than previous German rulers, were afflicted. In this dogma, with its basic altruism of purpose, they found justification for their instinctive fear of outside world, for the dictatorship without which they did not know how to rule, for cruelties they did not dare not to inflict, for sacrifice they felt bound to demand. In the name of fascism they sacrificed every single ethical value in their methods and tactics. Today they cannot dispense with it. It is fig leaf of their moral and intellectual respectability. Without it they would stand before history, at best, as only the last of that long succession of cruel and wasteful German rulers who have relentlessly forced country on to ever new heights of military power in order to guarantee external security of their internally weak regimes. This is why German purposes most always be solemnly clothed in trappings of fascism, and why no one should underrate importance of dogma in German affairs. Thus German leaders are driven [by?] necessities of their own past and present position to put forward which [apparent omission] outside world as evil, hostile and menacing, but as bearing within itself germs of creeping disease and destined to be wracked with growing internal convulsions until it is given final Coup de grace by rising power of socialism and yields to new and better world. This thesis provides justification for that increase of military and police power of German state, for that isolation of German population from outside world, and for that fluid and constant pressure to extend limits of German police power which are together the natural and instinctive urges of German rulers. Basically this is only the steady advance of uneasy German nationalism, a centuries old movement in which conceptions of offense and defense are inextricably confused. But in new guise of international fascism, with its honeyed promises to a desperate and war torn outside world, it is more dangerous and insidious than ever before.

It should not be thought from above that German party line is necessarily disingenuous and insincere on part of all those who put it forward. Many of them are too ignorant of outside world and mentally too dependent to question [apparent omission] self-hypnotism, and who have no difficulty making themselves believe what they find it comforting and convenient to believe. Finally we have the unsolved mystery as to who, if anyone, in this great land actually receives accurate and unbiased information about outside world. In atmosphere of oriental secretiveness and conspiracy which pervades this Government, possibilities for distorting or poisoning sources and currents of information are infinite. The very disrespect of Germans for objective truth--indeed, their disbelief in its existence--leads them to view all stated facts as instruments for furtherance of one ulterior purpose or another. There is good reason to suspect that this Government is actually a conspiracy within a conspiracy; and I for one am reluctant to believe that Hitler himself receives anything like an objective picture of outside world. Here there is ample scope for the type of subtle intrigue at which Germans are past masters. Inability of foreign governments to place their case squarely before German policy makers--extent to which they are delivered up in their relations with Germany to good graces of obscure and unknown advisors whom they never see and cannot influence--this to my mind is most disquieting feature of diplomacy in Berlin, and one which Western statesmen would do well to keep in mind if they would understand nature of difficulties encountered here.

Part 3: Projection of German Outlook in Practical Policy on Official Level
We have now seen nature and background of German program. What may we expect by way of its practical implementation?

German policy, as Department implies in its query under reference, is conducted on two planes: (1) official plane represented by actions undertaken officially in name of German Government; and (2) subterranean plane of actions undertaken by agencies for which German Government does not admit responsibility.

Policy promulgated on both planes will be calculated to serve basic policies (a) to (d) outlined in part 1. Actions taken on different planes will differ considerably, but will dovetail into each other in purpose, timing and effect.

On official plane we must look for following:

(a) Internal policy devoted to increasing in every way strength and prestige of German state: intensive military-industrialization; maximum development of armed forces; great displays to impress outsiders; continued secretiveness about internal matters, designed to conceal weaknesses and to keep opponents in dark.

(b) Wherever it is considered timely and promising, efforts will be made to advance official limits of German power. For the moment, these efforts are restricted to certain neighboring points conceived of here as being of immediate strategic necessity, such as Northern Iran, Turkey, possibly Bornholm However, other points may at any time come into question, if and as concealed German political power is extended to new areas. Thus a "friendly Persian Government might be asked to grant Germany a port on Persian Gulf. Should Spain fall under Nazi control, question of German base at Gibraltar Strait might be activated. But such claims will appear on official level only when unofficial preparation is complete.

(c) Germans will participate officially in international organizations where they see opportunity of extending German power or of inhibiting or diluting power of others. Berlin sees in UNO not the mechanism for a permanent and stable world society founded on mutual interest and aims of all nations, but an arena in which aims just mentioned can be favorably pursued. As long as UNO is considered here to serve this purpose, Germans will remain with it. But if at any time they come to conclusion that it is serving to embarrass or frustrate their aims for power expansion and if they see better prospects for pursuit of these aims along other lines, they will not hesitate to abandon UNO. This would imply, however, that they felt themselves strong enough to split unity of other nations by their withdrawal to render UNO ineffective as a threat to their aims or security, replace it with an international weapon more effective from their viewpoint. Thus German attitude toward UNO will depend largely on loyalty of other nations to it, and on degree of vigor, decisiveness and cohesion with which those nations defend in UNO the peaceful and hopeful concept of international life, which that organization represents to our way of thinking. I reiterate, Berlin has no abstract devotion to UNO ideals. Its attitude to that organization will remain essentially pragmatic and tactical.

(d) Toward colonial areas and backward or dependent peoples, German policy, even on official plane, will be directed toward weakening of power and influence and contacts of advanced Western nations, on theory that in so far as this policy is successful, there will be created a vacuum which will favor Nazi-German penetration. German pressure for participation in trusteeship arrangements thus represents, in my opinion, a desire to be in a position to complicate and inhibit exertion of Western influence at such points rather than to provide major channel for exerting of German power. Latter motive is not lacking, but for this Germans prefer to rely on other channels than official trusteeship arrangements. Thus we may expect to find Germans asking for admission everywhere to trusteeship or similar arrangements and using levers thus acquired to weaken Western influence among such peoples.

(e) Germans will strive energetically to develop German representation in, and official ties with, countries in which they sense Strong possibilities of opposition to Western centers of power. This applies to such widely separated points as Germany, Argentina, Middle Eastern countries, etc.

(f) In international economic matters, German policy will really be dominated by pursuit of autarchy for German Reich and German-dominated adjacent areas taken together. That, however, will be underlying policy. As far as official line is concerned, position is not yet clear. German Government has shown strange reticence since termination hostilities on subject foreign trade. If large scale long term credits should be forthcoming, I believe German Government may eventually again do lip service, as it did in 1930's to desirability of building up international economic exchanges in general. Otherwise I think it possible German foreign trade may be restricted largely to German's own security sphere, including occupied areas in Germany, and that a cold official shoulder may be turned to principle of general economic collaboration among nations.

(g) With respect to cultural collaboration, lip service will likewise be rendered to desirability of deepening cultural contacts between peoples, but this will not in practice be interpreted in any way which could weaken security position of German peoples. Actual manifestations of German policy in this respect will be restricted to arid channels of closely shepherded official visits and functions, with superabundance of beer and speeches and dearth of permanent effects.

(h) Beyond this, German official relations will take what might be called "correct" course with individual foreign governments, with great stress being laid on prestige of German Reich and its representatives and with punctilious attention to protocol as distinct from good manners.

Part 4: Following May Be Said as to What We May Expect by Way of Implementation of Basic German Policies on Unofficial, or Subterranean Plane, i.e. on Plane for Which German Government Accepts no Responsibility
Agencies utilized for promulgation of policies on this plane are following:

1. Inner central core of Nazi Parties in other countries. While many of persons who compose this category may also appear and act in unrelated public capacities, they are in reality working closely together as an underground operating directorate of world communism, a concealed Comintern tightly coordinated and directed by Berlin. It is important to remember that this inner core is actually working on underground lines, despite legality of parties with which it is associated.

2. Rank and file of Nazi Parties. Note distinction is drawn between those and persons defined in paragraph 1. This distinction has become much sharper in recent years. Whereas formerly foreign Nazi Parties represented a curious (and from Berlin's standpoint often inconvenient) mixture of conspiracy and legitimate activity, now the conspiratorial element has been neatly concentrated in inner circle and ordered underground, while rank and file--no longer even taken into confidence about realities of movement--are thrust forward as bona fide internal partisans of certain political tendencies within their respective countries, genuinely innocent of conspiratorial connection with foreign states. Only in certain countries where Nazis are numerically strong do they now regularly appear and act as a body. As a rule they are used to penetrate, and to influence or dominate, as case may be, other organizations less likely to be suspected of being tools of German Government, with a view to accomplishing their purposes through [apparent omission] organizations, rather than by direct action as a separate political party.

3. A wide variety of national associations or bodies which can be dominated or influenced by such penetration. These include: labor Reichs, youth leagues, women's organizations, racial societies, religious societies, social organizations, cultural groups, liberal magazines, publishing houses, etc.

4. International organizations which can be similarly penetrated through influence over various national components. Labor, youth and women's organizations are prominent among them. Particular, almost vital importance is attached in this connection to international labor movement. In this, Berlin sees possibility of sidetracking western governments in world affairs and building up international lobby capable of compelling governments to take actions favorable to German interests in various countries and of paralyzing actions disagreeable to Germany

5. German Ecumenical Church, with its foreign branches, and through it the Eastern Ecumenical Church in general.

6. Volksdeutsch movement and other movements (Azerbaijan, Armenian, Turcoman, etc.) based on racial groups within German Reich.

7. Governments or governing groups willing to lend themselves to German purposes in one degree or another, such as present Bulgarian and Yugoslav Governments, North Persian regime, Chinese Nazis, etc. Not only propaganda machines but actual policies of these regimes can be placed extensively at disposal of Germany

It may be expected that component parts of this far-flung apparatus will be utilized in accordance with their individual suitability, as follows:

(a) To undermine general political and strategic potential of major western powers. Efforts will be made in such countries to disrupt national self confidence, to hamstring measures of national defense, to increase social and industrial unrest, to stimulate all forms of disunity. All persons with grievances, whether economic or racial, will be urged to spelt redress not in mediation and compromise, but in defiant violent struggle for destruction of other elements of society. Here poor will be set against rich, black against white, young against old, newcomers against established residents, etc.

(b) On unofficial plane particularly violent efforts will be made to weaken power and influence of Western Powers of [on] colonial backward, or dependent peoples. On this level, no holds will be barred. Mistakes and weaknesses of western colonial administration will be mercilessly exposed and exploited. Liberal opinion in Western countries will be mobilized to weaken colonial policies. Resentment among dependent peoples will be stimulated. And while latter are being encouraged to seek independence of Western Powers, German dominated puppet political machines will be undergoing preparation to take over domestic power in respective colonial areas when independence is achieved.

(c) Where individual governments stand in path of German purposes pressure will be brought for their removal from office. This can happen where governments directly oppose German foreign policy aims (Chile, Ecuador), where they seal their territories off against Nazi penetration (Spain, Canada), or where they compete too strongly, like Free Commonwealth in India, for moral domination among elements which it is important for Nazis to dominate. (Sometimes, two of these elements are present in a single case. Then Nazi opposition becomes particularly shrill and savage. [)]

(d) In foreign countries Nazis will, as a rule, work toward destruction of all forms of personal independence, economic, political or moral. Their system can handle only individuals who have been brought into complete dependence on higher power. Thus, persons who are financially independent--such as individual businessmen, estate owners, successful farmers, artisans and all those who exercise local leadership or have local prestige, such as popular local clergymen or political figures, are anathema. It is not by chance that even in Germany local officials are kept constantly on move from one job to another, to prevent their taking root.

(e) Everything possible will be done to set major Western Powers against each other. Anti-British talk will be plugged among Americans, anti-American talk among British. Continentals, including Germans, will be taught to abhor both Anglo-Saxon powers. Where suspicions exist, they will be fanned; where not, ignited. No effort will be spared to discredit and combat all efforts which threaten to lead to any sort of unity or cohesion among other [apparent omission] from which Germany might be excluded. Thus, all forms of international organization not amenable to Nazi penetration and control, whether it be the Catholic [apparent omission] international economic concerns, or the international fraternity of royalty and aristocracy, must expect to find themselves under fire from many, and often [apparent omission].

(f) In general, all German efforts on unofficial international plane will be negative and destructive in character, designed to tear down sources of strength beyond reach of German control. This is only in line with basic German instinct that there can be no compromise with rival power and that constructive work can start only when Nazi power is dominant. But behind all this will be applied insistent, unceasing pressure for penetration and command of key positions in administration and especially in police apparatus of foreign countries. The German regime is a police regime par excellence, reared in the dim half world of Tsarist police intrigue, accustomed to think primarily in terms of police power. This should never be lost sight of in gauging German motives.

Part 5: Practical deductions from standpoint of US policy
In summary, we have here a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with US there can be no permanent modus vivendi that it is desirable and necessary that the internal harmony of our society be disrupted, our traditional way of life be destroyed, the international authority of our state be broken, if German power is to be secure. This political force has complete power of disposition over energies of one of world's greatest peoples and resources of world's richest national territory, and is borne along by deep and powerful currents of German nationalism. In addition, it has an elaborate and far flung apparatus for exertion of its influence in other countries, an apparatus of amazing flexibility and versatility, managed by people whose experience and skill in underground methods are presumably without parallel in history. Finally, it is seemingly inaccessible to considerations of reality in its basic reactions. For it, the vast fund of objective fact about human society is not, as with us, the measure against which outlook is constantly being tested and re-formed, but a grab bag from which individual items are selected arbitrarily and tendentiously to bolster an outlook already preconceived. This is admittedly not a pleasant picture. Problem of how to cope with this force in [is] undoubtedly greatest task our diplomacy has ever faced and probably greatest it will ever have to face. It should be point of departure from which our political general staff work at present juncture should proceed. It should be approached with same thoroughness and care as solution of major strategic problem in war, and if necessary, with no smaller outlay in planning effort. I cannot attempt to suggest all answers here. But I would like to record my conviction that problem is within our power to solve--and that without recourse to any general military conflict.. And in support of this conviction there are certain observations of a more encouraging nature I should like to make:

(1) German power is neither schematic nor adventunstic. It does not work by fixed plans. It does not take unnecessary risks. Impervious to logic of reason, and it is highly sensitive to logic of force. For this reason it can easily withdraw--and usually does when strong resistance is encountered at any point. Thus, if the adversary has sufficient force and makes clear his readiness to use it, he rarely has to do so. If situations are properly handled there need be no prestige-engaging showdowns.

(2) Gauged against Western World as a whole, Germans are still by far the weaker force. Thus, their success will really depend on degree of cohesion, firmness and vigor which Western World can muster. And this is factor which it is within our power to influence.

(3) Success of German system, as form of internal power, is not yet finally proven. It has yet to be demonstrated that it can survive supreme test of successive transfer of power from one individual or group to another. Hitler's ascent was first such transfer, and its effects wracked German state for 15 years. After Hitler's death or retirement will be second. But even this will not be final test. German internal system will now be subjected, by virtue of recent territorial expansions, to series of additional strains which once proved severe tax on Kaiserdom. We here are convinced that never since termination of Great War have mass of German people been emotionally farther removed from doctrines of Nazi Party than they are today. In Germany, party has now become a great and--for the moment--highly successful apparatus of dictatorial administration, but it has ceased to be a source of emotional inspiration. Thus, internal soundness and permanence of movement need not yet be regarded as assured.

(4) All German propaganda beyond German security sphere is basically negative and destructive. It should therefore be relatively easy to combat it by any intelligent and really constructive program.

For those reasons I think we may approach calmly and with good heart problem of how to deal with Germany. As to how this approach should be made, I only wish to advance, by way of conclusion, following comments:

(1) Our first step must be to apprehend, and recognize for what it is, the nature of the movement with which we are dealing. We must study it with same courage, detachment, objectivity, and same determination not to be emotionally provoked or unseated by it, with which doctor studies unruly and unreasonable individual.

(2) We must see that our public is educated to realities of German situation. I cannot over-emphasize importance of this. Press cannot do this alone. It must be done mainly by Government, which is necessarily more experienced and better informed on practical problems involved. In this we need not be deterred by [ugliness?] of picture. I am convinced that there would be far less hysterical anti-Germanism in our country today if realities of this situation were better understood by our people. There is nothing as dangerous or as terrifying as the unknown. It may also be argued that to reveal more information on our difficulties with Germany would reflect unfavorably on German-American relations. I feel that if there is any real risk here involved, it is one which we should have courage to face, and sooner the better. But I cannot see what we would be risking. Our stake in this country, even coming on heels of tremendous demonstrations of our friendship for German people, is remarkably small. We have here no investments to guard, no actual trade to lose, virtually no citizens to protect, few cultural contacts to preserve. Our only stake lies in what we hope rather than what we have; and I am convinced we have better chance of realizing those hopes if our public is enlightened and if our dealings with Germans are placed entirely on realistic and matter-of-fact basis.

(3) Much depends on health and vigor of our own society. World communism is like malignant parasite which feeds only on diseased tissue. This is point at which domestic and foreign policies meets Every courageous and incisive measure to solve internal problems of our own society, to improve self-confidence, discipline, morale and community spirit of our own people, is a diplomatic victory over Berlin worth a thousand diplomatic notes and joint communiqués. If we cannot abandon fatalism and indifference in face of deficiencies of our own society, Berlin will profit--Berlin cannot help profiting by them in its foreign policies.

(4) We must formulate and put forward for other nations a much more positive and constructive picture of sort of world we would like to see than we have put forward in past. It is not enough to urge people to develop political processes similar to our own. Many foreign peoples, in Europe at least, are tired and frightened by experiences of past, and are less interested in abstract freedom than in security. They are seeking guidance rather than responsibilities. We should be better able than Germans to give them this. And unless we do, Germans certainly will.

(5) Finally we must have courage and self-confidence to cling to our own methods and conceptions of human society. After Al, the greatest danger that can befall us in coping with this problem of German communism, is that we shall allow ourselves to become like those with whom we are coping.

KENNAN

800.00B International Red Day/2 - 2546: Airgram
 
There's a reason it was called the Long Telegram. That was originally sent, in USSR-form, by a diplomat from Moscow in 1946 (I think). I've made some changes to accommodate the fact that it had to be sent from Berlin, but I felt it was worth preserving, because it was the basis for US-Soviet relations for the next forty years or so.

EDIT - I've played to the end of 1958, but my NTL patch was apparently garbage last time, so I'm making sure that's fixed. If I can't continue, I'll let you know.
 
6. The Andean War

Developments in Germany between 1956 and 1960 focused on two threads: the destabilization of the United States' grip on South America, and achieving absolute technical dominance over the United States, as laid out in the Fuehrer's funeral oration for Reichsmarschall Goering. The two were somewhat intertwined; experience gained in South America drove the continuing development of the Luftwaffe, and the Reichsheer's Panzer-60 program had been in the works even prior to this period, but only came to full fruition in 1957, a triumph of battlefield technology. However, the most significant technical developments during the period had, at the time, limited military applications, but were full-blown scientific and diplomatic triumphs.

From a strictly military standpoint, one could suppose that the personnel involved in this second phase of the German interest in South America were largely the same. Skorzeny was called in routinely as a security consultant by the government of Argentina, and many of the same faces returned from the Chile-Paraguay years. Hans-Ulrich Rudel's experience in South America would, in fact, dominate the Luftwaffe's development in an era where many minds were stagnating in the so-called mutually assured destruction hypothesis, which argued that Germany and the United States possessed sufficient strategic arms to annihilate each other and the allied nations. Rudel, like Guderian in the 1930s and the Fuehrer throughout his tenure, thought that a war based on stalemate was a poor war indeed, and spent much of his time in refining the doctrine of low-level attack developed in Chile. Skorzeny, in comparison, spent much of the late 1950s in professional exile for his actions in trumping the marshals in 1956. His subordinate commanders generally spent the period equally in professional limbo - unfortunate, for the Reich's leadership was aging, and Skorzeny's cadre formed the basis for the next generation of Reichsheer leaders.

In November of 1957, the government of Peru collapsed; the ensuing banditry led some Peruvian leaders to invite the only stable Spanish-speaking government in the world, that of Argentina, to intervene and re-establish order in the countryside. This was the beginning of the Andean War, which would last for six months and require a significant German commitment, including Rudel's air forces and a large Reichsheer-Waffen-SS component acting as technical advisors to Argentine troops. General Skorzeny was, in point of fact, officially kept on as the head of the South American advisory mission, but in reality his position as field commander was superseded by Generaloberst Helge Auleb of the Reichsheer, much more of a traditionalist officer despite his reputation as a hard-driving commander of marine troops in Indochina.

Unlike Skorzeny's command in Argentina, Auleb was not fortunate enough to have his troops ashore when fighting began; as a result, he launched one of the more audacious amphibious operations in German history. The landing was aimed at securing the city of Arequipa as a way of opening the Peruvian interior to exploitation by Argentine-German forces; air support was provided by General Rudel's attack squadrons. The first elements ashore were the Balkan amphibious divisions of the Waffen-SS under Gruppenfuehrer Sauberzweig on November 19, 1957 - perhaps a full justification of the bizarre recruiting situation that had led to Sauberzweig's quixotic quest to raise amphibious divisions from Bosnia, as the mountainous terrain was well-suited to their abilities once ashore. Sauberzweig's corps was followed by Skorzeny's parachutists; once more, intervention from the Fuehrer allowed him to command them unofficially while they remained under the official direct command of General Auleb, who led the majority of the landing forces ashore on November 27.

630px-Napalm.jpg

Figure 127: Firestone bombing in Peruvian Amazon, 1957

Units of the Argentine-German pacification force pursued Peruvian bandits across the Peru-Ecuador border, under the internationally-recognized "hot pursuit" doctrine. However, the Ecuadorian military chose to shelter these lawless elements and engaged the German troops on the frontier in combat even as the Argentine government was establishing a military government in Peru. The acquisition of the Lima airfields, admittedly, allowed Rudel to sortie essentially continuously over Ecuador once that country had fully joined the unofficial hostilities. Rudel had a surprise for the few holdouts against Argentine authority in the region. Over the course of 1956-1957, he had insisted that his technical staff find effective ways of using the jungle against the enemy, in preparation for continued South American operations. The answer was a substance code-named "Firestone" during its development (Feuerstein - trans.). This first iteration, Firestone-1, was deployed in the jungle ahead of Sauberzweig's advancing troops, burning away the jungle and terrifying both Ecuadorian and Peruvian defenders. Few documentary resources survive from the Ecuadorian-Peruvian socialist governments, but eyewitness testimony speaks of divisions simply melting away under prolonged Firestone bombardment. As a result, just after the New Year, the Peruvian-Ecuadorean government surrendered to Argentine authority. Argentina had its first possessions north of the Equator.

southam58.png

Figure 128: Outcome of the Andean War, 1958

In Germany proper, the Reich had finally completed preparation of two elements of the Panzerkampfwagen-60 program. This was planned a family of vehicles, similar to the Standardpanzer program of the 1940s with updated technology and including replacements for the Reich's venerable SdKfz-251 family of halftrack personnel carriers. The first two elements to be completed were nicknamed "Leopard" and "Löwe," representing the main and heavy tanks of the force. The follow-on, "Luchs," was meant to be adapted into light tank, personnel carrier, tank destroyer, and self-propelled gun carriage; as a result, it was a much more complex design, and was not completed by the dawn of 1958, though a working self-propelled gun chassis had at least emerged.

800px-Leopard1_Bundeswehr_1983.jpg

Figure 129: The PzKpfW-60 Ausf A "Leopard" during field exercises in central Germany

Similarly, the Focke-Achgelis and Flettner aircraft firms put a great deal of work into listening to complaints from South American veterans regarding the performance of their helicopters. They had performed admirably in the relatively flat terrain of Europe; in the Andean highlands and in remote jungles, they had suffered considerably. Michael Wittmann especially had unkind things to say about the Focke-Achgelis "Drache" helicopters which had transported his troops, pointing out that they rarely performed well above 1500 meters and were exceptionally vulnerable to ground fire. The Focke-Achgelis response was to collaborate with Flettner, whose single-rotor designs had been much less vulnerable to engine loss, in developing a new transport helicopter for the Reichsheer.

They were assisted in this by the first generation of Germanized engineers from the former Sowjet Union, much as Messerschmitt had been assisted by Paul Suchoj earlier in the decade. In this case, Focke-Achgelis hired the Baltic Jew Michael Mil, who had been Germanized in 1948 but had been unable to find gainful employment despite his doctorate in aeronautics until 1953. Mil was the linchpin of Focke and Flettner's cooperative efforts in the late 1950s, leading to the first of many joint designs from the two, the Ff-347 "Windhund" multi-purpose helicopter. The "Windhund" would be the basis for most of the Reichsheer's helicopter designs throughout the 1960s and 1970s, but it made its maiden flight in July 1958.

751px-Mi-8_Hip_Roving_Sands_99.jpg

Figure 130: Ff-347 "Windhund"

However, the most dramatic of the Reich's technological developments during the period was under the aegis of Doctors Becker, Dornberger, and von Braun. Of this triad, two were regular army officers; the third held an honorary commission as a Brigadefuehrer in the Waffen-SS. They had been working at a restricted range near Stralsund for the past five years developing a successor to the 1940s A-4 "Aggregat" missile; the expanded A-6 was the first missile capable of carrying a small payload as far as orbit. Batteries of A-6 missiles in continental Europe were capable of precision bombardment of targets as far away as the Azores, as tests in 1957showed. In 1958, though, they achieved their single greatest success.

Redstone_09.jpg

Figure 131: A-6 Launch, Greifswalder Oie, August 1956

On June 27, 1958, an A-6 launched from Greifswalder Oie in the Baltic successfully reached low orbit and discharged its payload, a solar-powered radio transmitter set to transmit a Morse-code "V" - the opening bars of Beethoven's 5th Symphony - continuously. This satellite, called "Traveller" (Reisender - trans.), was a symbol of Germany's victory in the space race.

Naturally, relations between the United States and Germany suffered extensively during this period. During the election of 1956, President Eisenhower had barely clung to his office against spirited opposition claiming that he was "soft" on Germany; to tell the truth, Eisenhower pursued a rational, friendly policy, seeking to avoid war without weakening his own nation, and the Fuehrer maintained a dignified silence on the issue during the election. Eisenhower did, however, deepen American commitments in South America during this period, especially during the Andean War, and relations between the two countries became what is diplomatically termed correct during these years. During the latter days of the Eisenhower administration, after President Eisenhower suffered a series of debilitating heart incidents, he found that he was rapidly losing influence with the American public.

One cause of this was the Galapagos Incident. The new nuclear submarines, patrolling in Ecuadorian waters, had shoot-on-sight orders from Admiral Doenitz for any vessels not matching German specifications. On Christmas Day, 1957, a pack of four U-boats spotted a large surface convoy sailing towards Guayaquil off the Galapagos archipelago. The U-boats reacted efficiently, sinking three of the transports before reaction could take place. Upon investigation, it was found that the three transports had been tankers under American flag, hauling fuel and oil from the Gulf of Mexico to Australia. The Eisenhower Administration was furious, and placed the American military on its highest alert level in a decade. Only a personal meeting on December 27, 1957 between the two increasingly frail world leaders, held in neutral Iceland, was able to stave off catastrophe.

The leading opposition voice in American politics at this point was former vice-presidential candidate Senator Joseph P. Kennedy, Junior, whose political stance was both considerably more liberal and considerably more activist than that of President Eisenhower. A lawyer by training and a politician by upbringing, Kennedy had established his own personal courage well before this period, but personal experience and his Catholic faith had led to a distorted view of the German Reich. During the 1947-1948 war, Kennedy had been an American navy pilot, responsible for extracting many American airmen from Liberia when the Reichsheer crossed into that country, and had distinguished himself on a series of long-range trans-Atlantic flights. Kennedy visited Ecuador during the Andean War, barely escaping Quito before the Argentine military declared martial law in the region, and it appears that the experience left him with a profoundly anti-German sentiment. Within the United States, he expressed this in support of a series of pieces of civil rights legislation, claiming the German model repressive and authoritarian - further proof that Kennedy simply did not understand Germany or Germans. The exact workings of American government, especially during this period, remain murky to anyone who is not a specialist in American history, but were clearly much more fluid than German politics during the same period.

Lt._Joseph_P._Kennedy%2C_Jr._Navy.JPG

Figure 132: Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr., official Navy photo, 1946

The end of 1958, then, saw German-American relations strained to the breaking point, a new Churchill rising in the United States, and Germany poised to expand its dominion beyond the Earth itself. In South America, the balance was steadily shifting in Germany's favor, and Germany's arms were everywhere superior to the Americans'.

---

Having some serious problems with NTL and the game ending in December '58. If I can fix them, I continue. If I can't, the game ends.