I have over 3k hours, so I must know more right?
Crown laws affect everyone inside the de jure borders. The only time a crown law doesn't affect a de jure empire county is when they are controlled by an independent Kingdom (of whom is de jure). So lets say Bulgaria is de jure ERE, Bulgaria is independent. The crown laws in de jure Bulgaria are the laws of Bulgaria and not the ERE. If Bulgaria is a vassal of ERE then they are subject to the Crown laws of the ERE.I have an assumption to run by a 3000+ hour player, if you're so inclined to respond. Regarding crown laws, the way I observe this to work is that crown laws ONLY apply to direct vassal, not skip level vassals within the realm of their direct liege. In other words, as the Roman Emperor I might have crown laws set so that vassals cannot declare war on one another. So for all of my direct vassals who's lands are under my crown law, this is the in effect (potential bugs not withstanding).
My vassal, the Despot of Bulgaria, however, might have his own crown laws set so that HIS direct vassals can declare war on each other. They can fight each other all day long within Bulgaria. But, should the Duke of Moesia, vassal of the Despot of Bulgaria, want to attack a vassal the Despot of Serbia (Serbia being under Roman Crown Law), he will be prevented from doing so due to Roman crown law.
That indeed seems to be the way that it works, but I can't say that I've ever seen this articulated anywhere in any detail so would appreciate a sanity check from someone who knows the game well.
Just verified that a vassal changed their crown law related to vassal wars while under Roman Crown Law. So, if these vassals are subject to Roman crown law, it doesn't seem to make sense that they would need to change their own crown laws, as based on Dracko81's explanation those laws would serve no purpose. Or perhaps they set the laws in the event that they become independent? I dunno. This is one of those things about CK2 that I wish were presented more clearly.Hmm, I do see vassals changing their crown laws. I'll have to pay closer attention to ensure that it is only those vassals who are not subject to their liege's crown laws, because based on your comment it should only be those vassals that bother with a crown law of any sort.
Thanks for the response.
Vassal kings have always been able to change their crown laws - human player can't for reference. But the AI is still required to follow the laws of their de jure overlord and can not circumvent it.Just verified that a vassal changed their crown law related to vassal wars while under Roman Crown Law. So, if these vassals are subject to Roman crown law, it doesn't seem to make sense that they would need to change their own crown laws, as based on Dracko81's explanation those laws would serve no purpose. Or perhaps they set the laws in the event that they become independent? I dunno. This is one of those things about CK2 that I wish were presented more clearly.
And this is exactly why it's not a clear, logical presentation on the part of PDX. Why allow vassal kings to set laws that have no gameplay impact? Especially when the player in the same situation is not allowed to do likewise. I'm inclined to trust your observations on this, and will keep a closer eye on for my own verification purposes.Vassal kings have always been able to change their crown laws - human player can't for reference. But the AI is still required to follow the laws of their de jure overlord and can not circumvent it.