can you please add a suez crisis scenario begining in 1954 or 1955, because cold war starts getting hotter from that point
OK write up what you propose. Tell me who the leaders should be (cabinet by minister numbers) and when the coup occurs. I'd say two things, however:Hey great mod but there are a few ideas that I have. Now that we have all this extra infrastructure capacity, you should make some sort of national highway program event for countries like the US and Canada. Also I think that Czechoslovakia shouldn't be communist right from the start. It should be a social democrat which gets a coup event in 1946. This is because the czechs were trying to be a bridge between east and west, until the ruskies killed that dream , so there should be some way to reflect that in game and maybe even give them the option to go to the Allies in some weird situation.
I hope these suggestions help.
Present plans for the Suez scenario are to start July 25, 1956, the day before Egypt nationalizes the Suez Canal. That will give you a few months to deploy your forces. If you want to prepare earlier then I'd suggest loading up in 1945 as Britain or someone else, wait for Egyptian independence, reload as Egypt. You won't have that much to do so the years will go fast as other countries fight the Korean War. Your major decision is whether to intervene openly in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. (Historic choice is "send material and volunteers").
nomonhan said:What I'm trying to do is to order the AI to build fewer units overall and to concentrate on infrastructure. I cannot find any parameter to do that.
What I'm trying to do is to order the AI to build fewer units overall and to concentrate on infrastructure. I cannot find any parameter to do that.
I'm already looking at the Cold War Mod's stuff and have permission to use their material.
I don't want too many units spammed out over some 60 years time. For large countries that will be some trick. For medium sized and non-belligerent countries such as Sweden there's the peacetime IC mod. For small countries I think the best answer is very limited IC (2-4) plus enough free money so they can maintain themselves. East Turkestan would get a little bit more with control of Urumqi. But with just 3 border provinces they are not going to amount to much. That would be historical.by the way, i noticed East Turkestan, and i presume a lot more countries, can't build industry or infrastructure, any reason(s) for that ?
The distinction between "hard" and "soft" units does not apply in AoD. Mechanised divisions have ~50% softness, which makes them pretty much ideal for combined arms all on their own. For spearheads, Armoured Divisions can still be a good idea due to the "roll over" bonus they get (at the price of being a bit more fragile from a STR perspective and needing more fuel and supplies).Nomonhan, question regarding division types, since later in the Cold War both sides heavily mechanized their forces, for instance the Soviets stopped using foot infantry and mounted all their infantry divisions in BTR's and BMP's, how should that best be represented? It doesn't seem practical to make only Mechanized Infantry, because then your army is 100% hard units, without soft infantry.