Let's go for beta 7 then!
Let's make it a big hit.
We're still missing in-game building graphics...
Let's make it a big hit.
We're still missing in-game building graphics...
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Yeah, we need someone skilled in graphics and could commit the time and effort needed to accomplish the graphics.
Marquis, how have you been doing on redoing the interface?
Marquis, how have you been doing on redoing the interface?
Like I say, it's sluggish at the moment, only have a small amount of free time at the moment due to the amount of work I have to do, hopefully in a few weeks I can dedicate alot more time to working on the interface (in game one, the frontend is finished), early unit graphics (cold war + modern) and city graphics (probably the one in need of the most work - unless we use the same graphics for every part of the world).
I think it should be the same for almostly, except slight changes in the smaller town graphics.
We should have special buildings for the middle-east , africa and south america. But make the western ones first, and then we'll see what we can use in the others.
In the big cities which will be shown more or less they do.
Just have a base graphic with slight mods to things like what is the church in original.
Just have a base graphic with slight mods to things like what is the church in original.
Not all the big cities look alike. Not all of them has tall buildings. Some great cities only have many low buildings, and no high ones. Not in the western world I guess.
I think cities like Mexico have tall buildings in the center, but inly a few.
I think cities like Mexico have tall buildings in the center, but inly a few.
Yes, very few large cities in the mid-east have tall buildings. Baghdad seemed pretty level, no large outcroppings of skyscraper in the middle from the pictures i've seen, but i'm not very knowledgeful about the makeup of cities around the world.
This is a picture of Stockholm and so looks most of the major swedish cities. My point is the swedish cities have maximum one or two tall buildings, mostly the church.
about the winning and losing screens, i had2 wipe my system, so ill have2 look4 the images again il get back2 ya when i have them
Like London it has height restrictions
Like London
it has height restrictions
Yeah, I think the super high sky scrapers is more of a thing the Americas indulge in and its starting to catch on in East Asia.
I think most european cities are level, one because of height restrictions, but because they're generally very old. Which means the centre's are made up buildings almost 200 years old (eg. paris), only outcroppings are blocks of flats and telecom towers.
Weren't we going to have America as latin tech and europe as second best tech? So it would work like that. Give Latin skycrapers
Oslo doesn't have that many tall buildings, but it has the tallest hotel in Northern Europe. Throw in one Tall building in the graphic for europe.
And: Make some fine high detailed old buildings for europe... ok you don't need detailed, but make some old fine buildings.
Another thing: The chief judge's house and the tax collecter etc. How should their buildings look?
The chief judge (sp?) should have a medium tall building, right?
The dock can be an usual brick dock (you'll find one with the other dock graphics) and the ship yard should have one or two cranes.
Or Am I completely wrong?
Edit: Should Europe be orthodox then? that would be wrong, since we are at the same stage as you are, we have american airplanes etc.
And: Make some fine high detailed old buildings for europe... ok you don't need detailed, but make some old fine buildings.
Another thing: The chief judge's house and the tax collecter etc. How should their buildings look?
The chief judge (sp?) should have a medium tall building, right?
The dock can be an usual brick dock (you'll find one with the other dock graphics) and the ship yard should have one or two cranes.
Or Am I completely wrong?
Edit: Should Europe be orthodox then? that would be wrong, since we are at the same stage as you are, we have american airplanes etc.
hmmm, ok... maybe latin tech should be expanded to europe also. Give it to all the west (excluding south america) , isreal and russia. Then Orthodox for South America and certain asian nations, then muslim for mideast and exotic for africa.
Sounds good. I wouldn't care if america had taller buildings, but if they're more "civilized" than us it would be another thing.
The bigger the city is, the more taller buildings it has.
There are some old europe-fashion buildings in New England right? Maybe add one in the graphic? I think there's some in the whole east-coast of the USA, and most of europe.
The bigger the city is, the more taller buildings it has.
There are some old europe-fashion buildings in New England right? Maybe add one in the graphic? I think there's some in the whole east-coast of the USA, and most of europe.
grr...
No angry smile.
We are the same as you!
Its just your a bigger nation and whatnot.
Half of the advances being made are from Europe!
Latin should be all of the 'west' (West Europe, Israel, Japan, USA, Canada, Australia, NZ)
Russia is kinda out of it at the moment as is China, maybe they can change groups eventually along with maybe some other nations.