Did not this happen before?
Once. In Lite.
I cast my vote at the start of the first day, on a packmate - because he was the third voter - and when I came back the next day it was a 4-way tie with all 4 wolves in there ..
I like how pever and enk were both sort of telling the truth.
This update makes me laugh really hard, I will tell you that.
I was confused, and irritated and didn't want this silly drama to waste another entire day (or more) if the lynch result was unclear. My order was that I wanted both enk and pever to die, if one was lynched I would kill the other. If neither was lynched I would have killed pever; if both were lynched I would have done nothing.
I'm still not sure why an evil pever would announce that he is blocking the seer, but he seemed the best bet to be killed.
OY's point about enk was pretty good too, a completely cock-blocked seer is just as bad as none at all and I was certain that there was an apprentice out there somewhere.
If killing enk was lynch-worthy than knock yourselves out. I don't think it was, it was a risk but one that I thought worth taking in order to clear this mess up and let the village move on.
To be fair, this whole thing would have continued if enkhuush wasn't shot.
I mean, can you imagine what would have happened if pever had died alone? People would still be confused about it because pever *was* a Distiller.
So yeah, it wasn't a loss entirely. Especially not with that baddie lover thrown in.
It... kind of makes sense. Seeing how pevergreen was a distiller after all it's likely we would have run enkhuush up anyway, probably believing him to be a wolf of the other pack.
Exactly.
However, I still don't get why sbr would be confused at all. And by that, I mean that despite all the smoke and mirrors today it seemed fairly likely enkhuus was good. I thought sbr concurred with me. So why still shoot him?
At the very least he could have send in a conditional order ..