• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The Year of Strategic Crisis
Part 16: Littoral Expeditions III, November 20 – December 31, 1941

As had been noted previously, once the marines were ashore at Aden, Da Zara’s fleet was cut loose from providing close air support and could operate independently as the marines were occupied with taking the rest of the colonial territory. Da Zara had raided the island of Socotra and had sunk any and all British ships discovered there. This minor action did not, however, keep him occupied for long. In addition, Da Zara received reinforcements from Italy. Two brand new fleet carriers had been completed back in Ocotber, and by late November had been prepared for combat and sent down the Red Sea to join his fleet. These were the carriers RN Ilipa and RN Zama, named after two of Scipio Africanus’ most famous victories over the Carthaginians.

Thus, while the marines were marching through the deserts of Aden showing the flag to the various Bedouin tribes and showing the Italians to be the new masters of the area, Da Zara sailed further south. With two more fleet carriers, his airpower was doubled from four wings of carrier-borne warplanes to eight. Da Zara’s fleet had become truly awe-inspiring and formidable. The Italian Somali port of Muqdisho had fallen to a British overland invasion recently, and in preparation for a new marine operation in that area, Da Zara raided the port, as he had received intelligence that there was some sort of British naval presence in the area. It was only three squadrons of submarines, perhaps based there to attempt to interdict Italian maritime lines of supply and communication. Da Zara wiped them out.

075-01-RaidingMogadishu.jpg

The raid on Muqdisho.

Da Zar had worked out a way to use his overwhelming air strength without tying his own forces in a knot. He would use them on a 2/2 basis: two carriers dedicated to offensive operations, and two to defensive operations, or to a different offensive operation. This way, the Italian aviators would not have to worry about maneuvering in a sky bloated by Italian warplanes. While sensible and indeed correct, its first test proved awkward as superior British air forces based at Mombasa kept up a nonstop assault on Da Zara’s fleet and eventually forced it back beyond the range of those British fighters. This event changed the marines’ priority, fresh from occupying Aden, from recovering Muqdisho to assaulting and taking Mombasa, which was the only other port in British possession on the entire eastern half of Africa. It was a disaster in face of British resistance, the marines losing over two hundred and fifty men for no gain; only thirty-two British soldiers were killed. The marines landed at undefended Muqdishu instead, at least recovering that port for Italian use and denying it to the British.

075-02-AttackingMogadishu.jpg

The marines landing at Muqdishu after a defeat at Mombasa.

Da Zara, having recovered somewhat from the aerial pounding his newly strengthened fleet had taken, moved back down the coast of Kenya on a search and destroy mission to wipe out whatever British naval strength he could find. For a fleet of his size, the pickings were minor. There was no British battlefleet to destroy, merely isolated naval units. One destroyer flotilla was sunk by his action up through the end of the year, as were four transport flotillas, two submarine flotillas, and a light cruiser. It was likely a hemorrhage of local British naval strength, but compared to the potential pickings of Tel Aviv it was paltry. As an admiral, even one assigned to littoral operations, Da Zara still thought in terms of naval strategy rather than maritime strategy. The former concerned merely ships, their deployment and their use in combat against the enemy. The latter concerned the relation of ships and their effects on sea to events on land. Da Zara preferred to strike at the Mediterranean Fleet rather than simply blockade it. Fortunately, Mussolini understood maritime strategy and could control his admirals. Da Zara would stay off the coast of Kenya, covering the marines as they began their overland march to Mombasa.

075-03-OverlandMarchtoMombasa.jpg

The marines’ overland march to Mombasa.

Balsti’s 2a Divisione was quickly pulled off the march to Mombasa, however, to deal with a British threat that had materialized north of Muqdisho in the form of an infantry division. If both marine divisions left the port then the British might take advantage of circumstance to reoccupy it and wreck the marines’ logistics. Balsti attacked the British, but was unable to force them out of their positions. Re had to make the march to Mombasa on his own. Reaching the outskirts of the capital of Kenya, he attacked but too was thwarted. The marines, having split their strength to deal with two threats, were unable to defeat either of them. The British, superior in numbers by two brigades, were operationally concentrating in time, forcing the marines to disperse in space to deal with them. The marine response had failed.

075-04-FailedAttackonMombasa.jpg

Re’s failed attack on Mombasa.

The third littoral operation of the year was turning into a more protracted campaign than expected by Italian strategists and policymakers. The coup-de-main against Mombasa failed, and the marines were now dispersed in an attempt to deal with two threats at once. In the new year they would have to rethink their operation and concentrate to defeat each threat singly, together with massive support from Da Zara’s fleet. Italian operations for the year ended in stalemate everywhere. The marines were thwarted in Africa, the Soviets were stopped in Dacia and stalled despite recurrent pressure in Anatolia.
 
Well, not all years can be so successful as the last few have been for you. However, I think 1942 will be a better year. It is good to see the Navy develop more CV's. Are they comparable to those of Britian, USA, or Japan?
 
Enewald: Since HoI3 came out. :p

Maj. von Mauser: I have no idea what others' carriers are like. But these two I just built are IIRC using mostly/entirely 1940 techs. Maybe some 1938, maybe some 1942. :p

Jemisi: Yeah, British losses are slowly accumulating. Especially with the major element of their sea power staying in Tel Aviv. :p
 
It is said, "That every dog shall has his day"
In this case, the British soldiers were given some more time...

Granted eventually, the 2nd Roman Imperium shall crush the old carcass of Great Britain.:rolleyes:
(and her dominions...my beautiful Canada. :()

:rofl:
 
About those ships in Tel Aviv..Since they obviusly ARE getting supplies (if they weren't getting any, they would loose strenght, QuiAff?), what about taking Tel Aviv and forcing them to retreat to another port, in the Med., where there is no supplies? (Crete?) Or are you afraid they might retreat thru' Suez or Gibraltar?
 
Nazaroth: We'll see...:D

BlitzMartinDK: If supplies somehow reach Tel Aviv, they'd also reach anywhere else--and besides, there isn't anywhere else any more. Crete was never British, and I took Cyprus and Malta. :p

Jemisi: It never was. ;)

Update will be tomorrow evening, guys!
 
So they ARE definitely out of supply in Tel Aviv! -have you tried bombing recently? -to see if they are loosing strenght?

I don't think in HOI3 that being out of supply as such makes you lose strength. All that happens is you don't recover either combat or ongoing attritional losses - so it'd be a long time afore they starve and just disappear
 
Are they actually out of supply though? As far as I know, in 1.3, you can sail through any straights regardless of ownership can't you? Doesn't that mean that supply still moves through them if you have a port to bring it to?
 
I don't think in HOI3 that being out of supply as such makes you lose strength. All that happens is you don't recover either combat or ongoing attritional losses - so it'd be a long time afore they starve and just disappear

I thought it added another quantity of attritional losses too. But only a couple of percent, so it doesn't make a ginormous difference.
 
Jemisi: Remember, Cyprus was what I was attacking in preparation for an assault on Tel Aviv when the Spanish crisis struck. ;)

BlitzMartinDK: AFAIK units out of supply don't lose (much) strength. Or org, for that matter. :p

loki100: True, but given how idle they are, I have all the time in the world to wait. ;)

BlitzMartinDK: :p

True Grit: I believe they are, yeah. I've not caught any non-Italian ships getting in or out of the Med, and I've got Tel Aviv blockaded, and that's the only port not dominated by the Italians (or Vichy) in the Med. :p

womble: Maybe, dunno. :p

Update tonight, guys!
 
BlitzMartinDK: AFAIK units out of supply don't lose (much) strength. Or org, for that matter. :p

Ah, but they also don't regain lost strength - due to combat or attrition. So if you keep port-striking Tel Aviv, your bomber would eventually recover, but the British fleet would not. Hence you'll take less damage with each attack, and do more damage to the RN...
 
anweRU: That is true. That would also be quite bloody, and take a long time. And keep my (naval) air forces occupied while I could rather use them elsewhere. :p

Update coming up!
 
The Year of Strategic Crisis
Part 17: Technology and Procurement, July – December, 1941

At last we come again to the issues of strategic research and procurement again, the issues of capability which educate, though do not necessarily underpin, the evolution of Mussolini’s developing strategy of limited liability in Africa and defense everywhere else. There is little, if any, change to be seen in Italian research priorities during this period. However, Italian procurement decisions reflected certain pressing circumstances more than they had before.

July was a fairly productive month for Italian research teams, whether industrial or doctrinal. On the 3rd, the General Staff produced another study on central planning in operations. They continued their efforts by beginning another on the concept of the grand battle plan, which was the logical culmination of their work in this field. On the 7th, Macchi developed a more advanced aero engine and was given another contract, this one concerning single engine aircraft armament. The 11th saw the development by Breda of a new Italian support weapon, and a contract to Caproni for a medium fuel tank. At the very end of the month, the General Staff published a study on human wave tactics, which was supposed to improve divisional cooperation. Macchi gained another contract in the aftermath of this study, for a further developed single engine airframe. Finally, by the 5th of August, the Air Staff had completed another study on naval bomber tactics and immediately went to work on a sequel.

076-01-NAVTactics.jpg

The development of naval bomber tactics.

Immediately following that study was yet another Air Staff study, this one on port strike tactics. The work to update the manual began immediately. By the 22nd of August, an Air Staff study on naval air targeting had been completed, as had a General Staff study on guerrilla warfare—albeit, strictly speaking, it should rather have been partisan warfare. The distinction was that partisan warfare assumed a friendly conventional army whose operations the partisans would support, whereas guerrilla warfare assumed no such friendly forces. Nevertheless, the General Staff was ordered to continue their study of guerrilla warfare, and Macchi got a contract for small fuel tanks. On the 28th, Macchi developed a light bomb. At this point, Mussolini temporarily diverted funds from research in favor of increasing the size of Italy’s officer corps slightly, and did not replace Macchi’s contract with another one. This was indicative of a later move: on the 15th of September Mussolini ordered the creation of six more infantry divisions. He was expanding Italy’s army mightily.

076-02-Land-CentricProcurement.jpg

Italy’s land-centric procurement of September 15th.

To continue the roll of technological progress, an air launched torpedo was developed the next day by Macchi. Mussolini ordered a General Staff study into first aid. On the 17th, Breda completed their development of new infantry anti-tank weaponry, and Mussolini diverted resources back into research. Thus two new projects came into being after the completion of Breda’s: the further development of both large and small warship radar. In late September and early October, two more infantry divisions were deployed behind the front: not in Dacia, but rather in Anatolia as the beginning of a separate army. On October 13th, on the eve of the marine’s assault on Aden, the General Staff published a new manual on small wars and littoral operations for special forces. They immediately began working on a further edition of it. By October 20th, with the two new Italian carriers completed, Mussolini turned back to naval procurement. Two more fleet carriers were ordered, as well as the necessary CAG fleets, and four light cruisers too. Mussolini was planning on creating a third strike fleet.

076-03-Naval-CentricProcurement.jpg

Italy balancing its previous land-centric procurement with more naval procurement.

On the 3rd of November, the General Staff complete its study of the so-called grand battle plan. Apparently its development allowed for greater chances of fresh Italian divisions reinforcing the battle. At this point Mussolini turned back to naval development. Cantieri gained a contract for aircraft carrier anti-aircraft weaponry. A Naval Staff study on carrier group doctrine completed on the 5th was not renewed, but instead another contract went to Cantieri, for a further developed aircraft carrier engine. This was to be the pattern of the last two months. On the 7th, a carrier crew training manual was published and Cantieri got a contract for aircraft carrier armor. The only exception was on the 8th, when the development of a more advanced doctrine of light cruisers’ escort role led to a new Naval Staff study, on the concept of the carrier task force. On the 9th, a new single engine aircraft armament was developed, and a new manual on naval underway replenishment published. Cantieri gained two contracts: a better aircraft carrier hanger and light cruiser main armament. The 4th of December saw a new manual on light cruiser crew training, and a new contract to Cantieri for further advanced light cruiser engines. The development of a single engine airframe on the 5th led to a contract for light cruiser armor. The publication of another edition of the doctrine for port strike tactics by the Air Staff was replaced by a contract for light cruiser anti-aircraft armament. Another Air Staff study, on naval bomber tactics, was actually continued after its publication on the 9th. On the 25th, Macchi developed a small fuel tank, and the Air Staff was ordered to return to its studies on port strike tactics. The General Staff published another manual on guerrilla—really partisan—warfare, and began doing research for a third edition on the 28th. In the last development of the year, the General Staff study on first aid was completed on new year’s eve, and was replaced by orders for another on combat medicine.

076-04-CheWouldBeHappy.jpg

The publication of the second edition of Italy’s guerrilla—partisan—warfare manual.

And thus, it can be seen that research-wise, Italian priorities remained as they had the past two years. Doctrine was the most important aspect of the armed forces, with technology taking a more secondary importance—as it should be. On the other hand, Mussolini had begun the process to expand the Regio Esercito and, indeed, was forming another army which would stand side-by-side with Pintor in Anatolia.
 
Great update! I'm still loving this AAR.

Those are really expensive infantry divisions, what's your practical at? Presumably significantly below that for aircraft carriers.