- Dec 14, 1999
- 19.197
- 80.350
Let me explain myself a bit further. It is not that I see this as a bad idea but in view of the earlier Bethesda 'debacle' it might be as it draws some non-excisting parallels.
I don't mind about it though as I don't use sprites.
And, I have to say, I actually encourage the inclusion of downloadable content as a marketing tool but instead of sprites I would suggest some additional scenario's/campaign starts. I wouldn't mind paying E 1,99 for a May 1940 campaign start two months after release for example. Or for that matter an alternative may '45 scenario. Perhaps even a 'battle scenario pack'.
But paying from some extra eye-candy in a war game........it does bring up memories of Bethesda and EA (Empire Total war additional units).
Fredrik told me to post a poll, so we can see what you want..
Would have been nice if there was a "I like DLC and expansions" option, but eh.
I'd say i like both things. But if i have to choose, i'll choose expansions over DLC, because while DLC is a nice thing to add in smaller experiences or make smaller additions, at the same time, you can't really say no to all the content a proper expansion can offer, and the whole, expanding on the game bit
So i'ld like to see both things, with DLC offering smaller and more optional bits, stuff like adding in sprites, music and smaller experiences, perhaps some random events stuff, i dunno.. While the expansions move in to really move things.
I mean Fallout 3 with it's DLC is great, but at the same time, i also miss an expansion to really add something to the game.
So.. Both please