Yes a good central position for NATO is important.
How about Trieste and Taranto?
How about Trieste and Taranto?
Last edited:
Supaplex I have the impression that the generals you posted are modern(2006) Serbian generals not SFRY generals of the '90...
And maybe we can add another NATO base in Greece (is a NATO member?)Yes a good central position for NATO is important.
How about Trieste and Taranto?
No problem, Croatia almost done, Vojvodina too, Bosnia had some provinces painted... and the lake asked by Hax addedGukan how is map going? I Figure out how to paint in other layer?
Well I find that would be really stupid. Arkan was a paramilitary leader not any general. However there could be a ''Arkan's Tigers'' event or something that enables leader Arkan and gives Serbia few brigades or whatever you guys decide to use.
How much i wish our(I'm from Kosova) incompetent leaders would have chosen this flag in real life despite it being the election losers symbol(and despite some idiots argued that the star looks jewish)./cry
Oh well we gotta live with our Real Life abomination i guess.
Sry if too off-topic.
Supaplex I have the impression that the generals you posted are modern(2006) Serbian generals not SFRY generals of the '90...
Good Point, maybe Trieste must be added to the map?
You better have Arkan on that General List...
Isn't it possibl just to have a big american fleet in the Adriatic where they can send air attacks from?
An HoI2 carrier cant attack belgradeIsn't it possibl just to have a big american fleet in the Adriatic where they can send air attacks from?
Or must they be from land?
Before setting nato bases everywhere we think is fit we should look where they actually were...
adding Italy bulgaria romania greece, Austrtia, hungary but only 30-50 province each country.1900 is province limit. Yugoslavia and Albania have over 1000+ With strong country army and NATO army as well.