Rajas of india
- Thread starter spinoza013
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
If you don't like playing vanilla and like playing mods, this expansion should be great news for you, since India and three new religions probably mean lots of new tools for modders.
50% of nothing is still nothing for me.
Didn't they mention they would be optimising for that?
I dont know how you can optimize stats and events to not cause thinking! And there will be a lot more computer thinking with such an increase in characters!
People were really pleased with LoR when it was announced, I don't remember any criticism until after the release. The same for SoI, though I think there was a tiny bit of racist/Islamophobic butthurt.
Things like being able to buy your own wife or kid out of jail, for instance, absent since release, talked about all the time but nothing happens. Think what the depth here really is if you can't do a thing about your own wife being in your own vassal's jail. This is what I'm talking about as things that aren't there. Or heirs of feudal nobles being assigned as chaplain all the time, to the point that when you set up a dynastic marriage between two Catholic kingdoms, the male prince is not unlikely to show up in bishop robes. These two examples should tell you something about the depth of the game.
.png){kind=avatar}
Yeah, but it will all play the same. Who cares if he's Indian or lives in Sindh? I mean, alright.... Yeah, it'd be a cool standalone, but not only doesn't it fit into.the general CK2 mold (thematic consistency is important), but it leaves a buncha other more fitting improvements to wait or never be addressed.
I advise you to change it (the format). You can't haveAdded to my signature.
I could not possibly agree more. The interactions need so much more depth and realism.
Look, if you think they can swing an UNPRECEDENTED map expansion with 300 new provinces (50% the present area), new art, updated bookmarks (?), new religions, new units, new portraits in a mere few months -- and you think they're also going to add gameplay depth on top of that, when every expansion up til now has failed to achieve even far more modest goals, you need about 200% as many forum badges.
.png){kind=avatar}
I'm afraid 'gameplay' would be cited as an explanation there, same as what motivated the huge departure from the original de iure concept.
Only the format [ quote][ /quote] is unacceptable, not the content. You can write it as e.g.
victimizer: Curse you, Paradox! Adding tons of new fresh content is the surest way to infuriate your fans, didnt you know that?
Then Paradox should Kickstarter a super patch or ... something.... I don't know. :/
I'm interested of course, but sceptical. There are clearly more important features that needed to be addressed in a DLC over a map extension or more bookmarks, things like HRE mechanics, dynasties, crusades, RPG elements, etc. I also would have much preferred theocracies.
I'm going to wait and see how things start to look with this DLC.
I'm going to wait and see how things start to look with this DLC.
Umm, ChildeR is aware of this; he is most likely referring to new mechanics added for those new religions.