Naval battles? Is this an allusion to the possible introduction of this feature in future in case we'll be diligent boys and will not be engaged in piracy?)
Last edited:
i am a viking and i like to plunder whores from the continential cost. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRSGSb7_L2Y
God, look at the amount of self-rightousness in this thread.
Yes, Paradox needs money to operate. Piracy is bad for Paradox. Pirating is wrong when it is against such a nice company as Paradox. It's bad. It's wrong. It's badong. Piracy hurts Paradox. Do you really want to hurt Paradox?
That is my opinion. If you want to check the game to see if it's buggy, play the demo or ask the forums. Everything else is just whitewashing. The games aren't even that expensive and often are on sale on Gamersgate if you wait a little. Games aren't a human right. Someones intellectual property is not a right.
Italicized and bolded your hypocrisy.
Talk about whitewashing.
With all due respect, dont you think you are hurting the developers of thoses games more than if you actualy pirated their games ?Piracy is simply not justifiable(sp?) to me. If a company rips you off once, shame on them, if they do it twice shame on you, if you keep falling for it, you're pretty dense. Madden NFL Football, SOCOM US NAVY SEALS, and a few other titles are company and developers that have simply proven to not give a damn about the hardcore fanbase and as such have lost my support. I do not pirate their games to test run them in the off chance I may like the product;just simply do not purchase them (which really hurts because I loved SOCOM on the PS2.
Wait, so that renders my argument invalid? How?
Oh never mind. I changed it to what I meant. Is the so called hipocracy still there?
In realted news, I think it's wierd that people so happily claim that they have pirated the game here. I mean come on, this is Pardox' own forum. They will read this. And then admitting that you don't consider their game worth paying for? I mean come on. That's just mean and rude.
Its hypocrisy because the way you wrote it make it seem as if you thought piracy was only bad when it hurt a company you liked, but not so otherwise. Basically, thats like saying there are times when piracy is not an issue or can even be beneficial, which is what other people here where arguing. It is fixed now, thought I wonder if it was something like a freudian slip