• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Europa Universalis IV - Development Diary 26th of July 2022

Hello everyone! Today I’ll introduce you to the new monuments we’ve designed for the next update. As before, this content will be free for all Leviathan DLC owners. Along with that, I’ll also comment on some game balance changes we’ve implemented for free in the 1.34 update.

New Monuments

As already mentioned in some of the previous DDs, we decided to introduce a few more monuments. Overall, we’re happy with the monument density we got after the 1.32 update, so we just wanted to address one specific region that was lacking in love (Scandinavia, which fits in pretty well with the upcoming DLC), and a few gaps we wanted to cover here and there. Since we had few monuments to cover this time, we also tried to get creative with the attached modifiers (you may notice some new modifiers on them, also). Let’s see:

The Falun Copper Mine was already present in the game, as a local modifier to the province of Dalaskogen. As it was the main copper production site for Europe in the Modern Age, we decided to turn it into a monument (and for those not owning Leviathan, the local province modifier will stay as it is).

great_project_falun_copper_mine.jpg

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Local modifiers:
+3 Local Goods Produced

Area modifiers:
−5% Local construction cost
−5% Local construction time
Local modifiers:
+6 Local Goods Produced

Area modifiers:
−10% Local construction cost
−10% Local construction time

Global modifiers:
-10% Artillery cost
Local modifiers:
+9 Local Goods Produced

Area modifiers:
−20% Local construction cost
−20% Local construction time

Global modifiers:
-20% Artillery cost

Built by King Erik VII in the early 15th century, Kronborg Castle was established to enforce the Sound Toll, though it would later be transformed into a magnificent royal residence.

great_project_kronborg.jpg

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Local modifiers:
+15% Local defensiveness

Global modifiers:
+25% Navy tradition from protecting trade

When upgraded:
+1 Mercantilism
Local modifiers:
+25% Local defensiveness
+1 Naval combat local bonus off owned coast

Global modifiers:
+50% Navy tradition from protecting trade

When upgraded:
+3 Mercantilism
Local modifiers:
+33% Local defensiveness
+2 Naval combat local bonus off owned coast

Global modifiers:
+100% Navy tradition from protecting trade

When upgraded:
+6 Mercantilism

The city of Visby was one of the main ports on the Baltic trade routes, its walls protected it from its many enemies, making it the heart of an independent Gotland.

great_project_visby_city.jpg

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Local modifiers:
-25% Local shipbuilding time
+50% Hostile disembark time

Global modifiers:
+20% Privateer efficiency
Local modifiers:
-33% Local shipbuilding time
+100% Hostile disembark time

Global modifiers:
+33% Privateer efficiency
+15% Domestic trade power
Local modifiers:
-50% Local shipbuilding time
+200% Hostile disembark time

Global modifiers:
+50% Privateer efficiency
+25% Domestic trade power

Trakai Island Castle was completed in the early 15th century by Grand Duke Vytautas, first for a military purpose and later transformed into a royal residence.

great_project_trakai_castle.jpg

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Local modifiers:
+10% Local manpower modifier

Global modifiers:
+0.25 Yearly prestige
+0.5 Monthly splendor
+5% Reform progress growth
Local modifiers:
+15% Local manpower modifier

Global modifiers:
+0.5 Yearly prestige
+1 Monthly splendor
+10% Reform progress growth
+1 Possible advisors
Local modifiers:
+25% Local manpower modifier

Global modifiers:
+1 Yearly prestige
+2 Monthly splendor
+20% Reform progress growth
+2 Possible advisors

Salvador da Bahia was one of the oldest cities established by the Portuguese in Brazil, becoming the capital of the colony for more than two centuries.

great_project_salvador_da_bahia.jpg

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Local modifiers:
+10 Local trade power

Global modifiers:
+10% Global trade power
+10 Global settler increase
Local modifiers:
+15 Local trade power

Global modifiers:
+10% Global trade power
+10 Global settler increase
+0.25 Goods produced
Local modifiers:
+25 Local trade power

Global modifiers:
+10% Global trade power
+10 Global settler increase
+0.5 Goods produced

M'banza-Kongo was the seat of Manikongo, the ruler of the Kingdom of Kongo, becoming the most important city in the region during the 15th and 16th centuries, as the power of its king prospered.

great_project_mbanza_kongo.jpg

Requirements:
Culture is in Kongo group and is accepted by its owner

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Global modifiers:
+20% Institution spread in true faith provinces
+10% Reform progress growth
Global modifiers:
+33% Institution spread in true faith provinces
+15% Reform progress growth
+0.5 Yearly legitimacy
Global modifiers:
+50% Institution spread in true faith provinces
+20% Reform progress growth
+1 Yearly legitimacy
Allow Estate Privileges to be revoked regardless of loyalty and influence

The historic city of Harar Jugol was one of the main places of pilgrimage for Muslims, with dozens of mosques and shrines, and a tradition of scholars and holy men.

great_project_harar_jugol.jpg

Requirements:
Province has the state or syncretic religion, which is in Muslim group.

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Local modifiers:
+0.25 Institution Growth

Global modifiers:
+0.1 Prestige per development from missionary
Local modifiers:
+0.25 Institution Growth

Global modifiers:
+0.2 Prestige per development from missionary
-10% Stability cost modifier
Local modifiers:
+0.5 Institution Growth

Global modifiers:
+0.3 Prestige per development from missionary
-25% Stability cost modifier

When upgraded:
Unlocks decision which allow to embrace Legalism at below -50 Piety and Mysticism above 50 Piety

Dujiangyan is related to the ancient irrigation system developed around the city of the same name, and how it made the Sichuan region one of the most prosperous in China.

great_project_dujiangyan.jpg

Modifiers:

Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Local modifiers:
-20% Province governing cost
-5% Development efficiency

Area modifiers:
-0.05 Monthly devastation
Local modifiers:
-10% Development efficiency
+1 Possible number of buildings

Area modifiers:
-20% Province governing cost

Region modifiers:
-0.05 Monthly devastation
Area modifiers:
-40% Province governing cost
-10% Development efficiency
+1 Possible number of buildings

Global modifiers:
-0.05 Monthly devastation



Idea groups & Policies rebalance

We already talked in previous DDs about the new national ideas that we developed for some countries. Along with that, we decided to rebalance some of the existing idea groups. The general design behind this rebalance was to give again a bit of extra diversity to the different groups available, so choosing different possibilities between them might be more viable from this update. Getting into more detail, here are some of the reasoning behind specific changes:
  • Ideas giving National Manpower and Land Force limit are nerfed, to combine them with the new changes in the combat system. We felt that there were already many different sources of Manpower and Land Force available to the player and that also some ideas (e.g. Quantity) were heavily favored over others.
  • We’re also nerfing both the Economic Ideas and the Economic-Quality Policy Development Cost reduction, as we felt that we already introduced a fair amount of Development Cost elsewhere, so we saw it right to reduce it considerably here, effectively rebalancing the total amount you get from these sources.
  • We wanted to buff some of the underdogs in the Idea Groups, such as Espionage, Trade and Naval, to make them more viable compared to others in their groups.
Here you’ve got a detailed account of the changes implemented:
  • Innovative Ideas:
    • ‘Optimism’ gives now also gives +1 Leaders without Upkeep.
    • 'Formalized Officer Corps' replaced by ‘Expanded Policies’, now granting +1 Free Policies.
  • Economic Ideas:
    • Bonus now gives -10% Development Cost instead of -20%.
  • Espionage Ideas:
    • ‘State Propaganda’ now also reduces Covert Action Relation Impact by -50%.
    • ‘Vetting’ now also grants -0.1 Yearly Corruption.
    • ‘Audit Checks’ replaced by ‘Blackmailing’, now granting:
      • Reasons to Accept Vassalization +15.
      • Monthly Favors Modifier +33%.
    • Bonus gives now Rebel Support Efficiency of 100% instead of just 50%, and reduces Covert Action Relation Impact by -50%.
  • Trade Ideas
    • ‘Shrewd Commerce Practice’ now also decreases Promote Mercantilism Cost by 25%.
    • ‘Free Trade’ now also gives +2 Merchant Trade Power.
    • ‘Overseas Merchants’ now also decreases Trade Company Investment Cost by 25%.
    • Bonus now also gives +10% Loyalty of the Burghers/Vaisyas
  • Exploration Ideas:
    • ‘Free Colonies’ now gives +10% Settler Chance.
    • ‘Global Empire’ now also gives +25% Treasure Fleet Income.
  • Aristocratic Ideas:
    • ‘Noble Knights’ gives now -20% Cavalry Cost instead of 10% and +15% Cavalry Combat Ability instead of 10%.
    • ‘Serfdom’ now gives +20% National Manpower Modifier instead of +33%.
    • ‘Noble Connections’ now increases mercenary manpower by 25% instead of 20%.
  • Divine Ideas:
    • ‘Martyrs’ gives now +25% Manpower in True Faith provinces instead of +15% Global Manpower modifier.
  • Horde Ideas:
    • Bonus now also gives +10% Tribes Loyalty Equilibrium.
  • Indigenous Ideas:
    • ‘Controlled Burns’ from Indigenous Ideas gives now +15% National Manpower Modifier instead of +20%
  • Offensive Ideas:
    • ‘Grand Army’ now gives +10% Special Unit Force Limit and +15% Land Force Limit Modifier instead of 20% Land Force Limit Modifier.
  • Quality Ideas:
    • ‘Quality Education’ now also gives +0.5 Navy Tradition.
  • Quantity Ideas:
    • ‘Levée en Masse’ now gives +33% National Manpower Modifier instead of 50%.
    • Bonus now gives +33% Land Force Limit Modifier instead of +50%.
  • Naval Ideas:
    • ‘Naval Glory’ now also gives +1 Impact on Siege.
    • ‘Oak Forests for Ships’ now also gives +10% Ship Durability.
    • Bonus now gives -100% Naval Barrage Cost instead of +10% Ship Durability.
Policies:
  • Economic - Quantity:
    • No longer gives -10% Development Cost, instead it gives -5% Land Maintenance Modifier.
  • Innovative - Quality:
    • Now gives Infantry Combat Ability +15% instead of +10%.
  • Aristocratic - Espionage:
    • Now gives Cavalry Combat Ability +15% instead of +10%, and +10% Noble Estate Loyalty Equilibrium.


Crownland & Government Reform Progress

You may know that it was commented by my colleagues @PDX Big Boss and @Ogele that we replaced the tax modifier from high crownland with Reform progress growth, but for those who don’t follow as much in detail the DDs, here is a kind reminder of it:

1657651615437.png

We made an additional change to this: now each Crownland Level above 50% Crownland increases Reform Progress Growth (the modifier, not the flat value) by 20%, up from the current 10%, so the final amount of RPG you can get at 100% Crownlands is 100%. And we’ve also lowered the subsequent reform growth cost from 50 to 40. This makes for more consistent growth of RP, making it easier to progress through the expanded tiers of Government Reforms.



Governing Capacity

Along with the above change, we also decided that we could make Reform Progress Growth even more strategic, by adding a malus to Administrative Efficiency if being over the Governing Capacity - which is something that can be countered either by the Centralize State mechanic or by getting more Gov. Cap. with buildings, monuments, reforms, etc. This will certainly curb growth speed, but we think that this also adds some more depth to the game because it presents the player with the choice of how to get extra Gov. Cap. from the different features from where it can be expanded, but also an additional “How do I spend my precious Government Reform Progress” because it can be used either on the ‘Centralize State’ mechanic or in getting more Government Reforms.

Thus, the change we implemented is adding -1% Administrative Efficiency for every 2% Governing Capacity above the cap. This way it scales logically and gives off a dynamic and natural effect on the expansion speed of the country in question.

Adm..jpg

To help adjust the Governing Capacity, we made that Courthouses and Town Halls no longer require an open building slot to be constructed, similar to how Universities work, making them a more interesting type of building. Additionally, the State House building now no longer requires an open building slot, and now decreases local governing cost by a percentage of 25% and a flat -25. These governing modifiers are doubled when constructed on a Paper, Gems or Glass province.



Other Miscellaneous Changes

Aside from that, we've implemented a few more changes here and there, which we're covering in this miscellaneous section, as we think they might be of interest:

  • Slackening for Manpower now only gives 1 year worth of manpower instead of 2 years.
  • Expanding the Infrastructure of a province now increases local development cost by -25% instead of -5%. We decided against using Development Efficiency because it could end up at 0 Dev Cost for a province
  • Ramparts give 1 Combat Roll Bonus for the defender.
  • Pagan religious rebels can now force you to convert to their religion if the majority of your country has this religion. Nahuatl, Mayan and Ican are excluded from it due to their "primitive" status in the game.
  • If you have Mare Nostrum then the Spy Network in a foreign country will decrease AE Impact in that nation by -30% instead of -10%
  • Support Rebels now costs 30% Spy Network instead of 60%
  • Scorched Earth now causes +0.25 Local Monthly Devastation alongside the -50% Hostile Movement Speed for 5 years
  • Devotion now gives +25% Church Power, 25% Harmonization Speed, 0.001 Monthly Piety Accelerator, 0.5 Yearly Authority, 0.1% Yearly Patriarchal Authority, 0.5 Yearly Doom Reduction, 0.05 Yearly Karma Decay and 0.05% Clergy/Brahmins Loyalty Equilibrium additionally to the Papal Influence, Prestige and Global Tax modifiers
    Note: this change has been added to make Theocracies more fitting for other religions too.
  • Crimea now becomes a Tributary State of the Ottomans instead of a March when they seek Ottoman protection during the "Fate of the Crimean Khanate" event.

There were a lot of things to cover today! Please let us know of any feedback you have regarding these changes, as we feel today's DD is more about engaging with the community on balance changes than any other. Also, keep in mind that the numbers presented still have room for improvement, so please stay civil in discussing them. Next week the DD will be all about the great art our team has been working on for the upcoming DLC, brought to you by @SaintDaveUK . See you!
 

Attachments

  • great_project_mbanza_kongo.jpg
    great_project_mbanza_kongo.jpg
    105,8 KB · Views: 0
  • 127Like
  • 44Love
  • 19
  • 15
  • 7
Reactions:
How does the Salvador de Bahia monument's T2-T3 effect on +goods produced work? Because if it gives straight + goods produced on a province, T3 is equivalent to +2.5 production dev on EVERY single province. Isn't that a lot or am I just exaggerating? SA has ~250 provinces, multiply it by 2.5 extra prod. dev, multiply by 3(trade good price) to get the yearly extra production income = 1875. Let's say provinces have autonomy and lower it to yearly extra 1000 ducats just from production income. Upgrade to T3 costs a total of 8500 ducats (and some time). To me, it seems so good that taking loans and maxing it out is reasonable even if you haven't conquered all the continent.
 
  • 8
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
@Pavía Regarding the cannon backline define; if you set morale damage taken to 0, the cannons do not take any morale damage whatsover which leads to a situation where the cannons take full casualty damage at the end of the battle if you do not manually retreat - meaning you always lose all of your cannons if you were going to lose that battle. Would it be possible to make the cannon backline morale damage define act the same way as cannons did before the change? I.e. cannons take morale damage but continue firing at 0 morale and do not retreat at 0 morale until the frontline is empty.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
I think economic + quantity shouldn't lose as much as 20% to dev cost. I think it would be healthier to reduce the economic dev cost bonus to 15% and reduce the quantity policy bonus from 10 to 5% of the dev cost. Expand infrastructure is better if it reduces dev cost not by 25% but by 15%.

I agree with nerf Economic + quantity but i think this nerf is too huge. Somebody can't do expand infrastrukture on many cases because of govering capacity for example in WC or huge and fast conquest. We should also remember that exceeding govering capacity is even more painful.
 
  • 20
  • 6
Reactions:
A very nice dev diary.
However, I really question the reasoning for not having courthouses, town halls and state houses not require a building slot. Why, when you want to make governing capacity more important and "strategic", take away the opportunity cost for building gc buildings? Now, as soon as you have enough money, spamming these everywhere will be a no-brainer. How does this improve the game or make these buildings more "interesting"? Mindless clicking instead of actual strategic choice is not interesting.
This decision should be reconsidered, in my opinion.
I have mixed feeling about this, while I agree with you that spamming courthouses will be a no brainer and it doesnt add any depth to the game nor fun, managing buildings mid to late game is already tedious as it is.
 
  • 14
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Yea honestly this needed to happen. The building was basically required already. It's a gold sink and that's it. I'd really just prefer EU3's building system.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
  • 2
Reactions:
Opinion on making administrative development useful for mid-to-lategame? One idea I've seen is tying administrative development to governing capacity, so that tax income meta can actually be a thing. Currently production and manpower development is optimal, as well as exploiting tax development as often as possible so you can optimise governing capacity.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
All it's gonna do is make quality eco quantity the meta instead of quantity eco quality. Really spicy changes.

Quantity and Economic benefitted from stacking on top of each other. At least a Quality-Eco meta would not have ludicrous army sizes as before.

And if anything, Innovative will be considered with Quality now as well.

Edit: I would also like to add on that Quality, Manpower will be spent more which means you will lose steam quicker, unlike with Quantity.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Can you specify which monuments have which tier in the start date? I think it's important. Also, I can't see the changed ''Expanded Policies'' which gives 1 free policies anywhere in Innovative.
 
  • 3Like
  • 2
Reactions:
I really love the changes, including the Admin Efficiency punishment.

But may I suggest throw in Inf-to-Cav Ratio into the ideagroups somewhere? It's a modifier that many countries might want but can't get anywhere except for turning Tengri and/or being a Horde/Cossack.
 
  • 8Like
  • 6Love
  • 1
Reactions:
  • ‘State Propaganda’ now also reduces Covert Action Relation Impact by -50%.

This is 100% useless, and I highly recommend a different bonus be added.

If you're building a spy network in a country, you wanna cause harm, whether that's directly through conquest, rebels, trade conflicts, etc. You are not going to care about the opinion of a country you're spying on.

Also on the subject of espionage ideas, please change it so that rebels who are supported cannot be dealt with via harsh treatment. It won't really change too much, but I had a 1356 game where I was playing Byzantium and was trying to get Genoa's provinces to defect since declaring directly on an HRE member would be suicide. I continually supported rebels which regularly got to 80-90%, at which point Genoa would just use the Harsh Treatment option. The separatist faction never popped because of that.
 
  • 21
  • 4Like
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
How does the Salvador de Bahia monument's T2-T3 effect on +goods produced work? Because if it gives straight + goods produced on a province, T3 is equivalent to +2.5 production dev on EVERY single province. Isn't that a lot or am I just exaggerating? SA has ~250 provinces, multiply it by 2.5 extra prod. dev, multiply by 3(trade good price) to get the yearly extra production income = 1875. Let's say provinces have autonomy and lower it to yearly extra 1000 ducats just from production income. Upgrade to T3 costs a total of 8500 ducats (and some time). To me, it seems so good that taking loans and maxing it out is reasonable even if you haven't conquered all the continent.
Honestly that seems so good that it'd be optimal to forego making a Brazilian CN in order to hold that monument directly. +2.5 production dev across your entire empire is +50%(!) goods produced if you average 5 production dev, and it stacks multiplicatively rather than additively with goods produced modifiers.
 
  • 7
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I think that this change is a huge nerf to economic ideas because you are lossing -20% of development cost with thw nerf of basic idea. I prefer nerf Land Force Limit Modifier 10% to 5%.
  • Economic - Quantity:
    • No longer gives -10% Development Cost, instead it gives -5% Land Maintenance Modifier

Yeah, I agree. I think this is a double-whammy because the two modifiers feed into each other. By reducing both, you're going to see an out-sized effect on land force limit. One or the other, but please not both. I usually take economic only for the dev cost reduction. By changing it to only offer 10% instead of the 30% with quantity, I probably won't take it unless I need the discipline from the Eco-Quality policy in a SP game now.
 
  • 10
  • 9
Reactions:
Wow, this is definitely going to shake things up. Love it!

I do feel that defensive has been kind of left out? I feel like it could use a niche where it actually makes combat better on your own terrain. Currently it's used in tandem with offensive where you just have the enemy sieges take longer on your terrain and because of that you can siege more quickly than your enemy.

That said, offensive does this better in every way, meanwhile defensive is left with no good or unique features and no good or unique policies. There is really nothing there that makes my head spin with ideas. Only thing being maybe attrition stacking, but with the cap of 5% and mercs being a thing it just doesn't work.

As a side node, what's the 'Expanded Policies'? Can't find it on innovative ideas or policies. Also feel like innovative ideas would have been a great fit for reform progress growth.
 
  • 2
Reactions: