• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.

Johan

Studio Manager Paradox Tinto
Administrator
Paradox Staff
Moderator
15 Badges
Dec 14, 1999
19.194
80.189
  • Diplomacy
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • War of the Roses
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Magicka
  • Starvoid
It’s yet another Friday, and I am busy wrapping this project up. Before I go off for a weekend of resting, I’ll give you some sneakpeaks in this little development diary though.


One of the most eagerly awaited features of Napoleons Ambition is the option to go with Historical Monarchs/Leaders/Advisors. Here you see me running with the option of historical monarchs, and I get Karl XII on the historical date. Running with this option means more historical flavor, at the expense of some gameplay-options like succession wars, royal marriages and inheritances as they will not serve any purpose.

na_aug3a.jpg


As mentioned last week, we have expanded the scripting capacity of the game-engine severly. With the following effects added upon the large amounts already existing, you could create very powerful usermods. For example, if you so determine, you could have entirely different dynasty-chains for different countries appearing depending on choices.

Code:
any_owned = {}
any_neighbor_country = {}
random_center_of_trade = {}
set_revolution_target = this/from/tag
country_event = event_id
province_event = event_id
remove_province_modifier = <modifier>
remove_country_modifier	= <modifier>
revolt_risk = <num>
create_marriage	 = this/from/tag		
create_alliance	 = this/from/tag		
create_admiral = <power>
create_explorer	= <power>
create_conquistador = <power>
create_general = <power>
create_colony = <size>
remove_merchant = this/from/random/tag	
send_merchant = this/from/random/tag	
kill_ruler = "name" / this		
kill_leader = "name"
define_admiral = { name, stats etc..}
define_explorer = { name, stats etc..}
define_conquistador = { name, stats etc..}
define_general = { name, stats etc..}
random_empty_neighbor_province = {}
release_vassal= this/from/random/tag


In Napoleons Ambition you will be able to create new centres of trade as well as destroy them. You can create a new centre in any of your provinces that fullfill the following conditions. It must be trading with a centre of trade not owned by you, that centre must trade at least 400 ducats worth, and you must be able to afford to pay 500 gold to open it. You can only close centres that you own, if they are worth less than 300 ducats of trade in total. This screenshot shows my England that could afford splitting the Burgundy CoT by opening their own trade in London. There are a lot of strategic options to this, and it will change quite a lot how trade works in the game.

na_aug3b.jpg
 
basharious said:
oh, changed the sign of building a ship, have we?

London has no port, and can't build ships :)
 
spier said:
Good to hear, although i'm a little concerned about the possible exploits associated with being able to set up COTs at whim.

I think that limiting the number of COTs that you can open in a given time frame and based upon the size of your empire would be one way of controlling COT expansion. I imagine that having the AI of every large empire open up a COT in would be a bit chaotic for the world market.

I do see a lot of promise for this feature. To add another strategic element to it, would it be possible to implement a feature whereby your colonies would automatically send their goods to your COT if you open one up rather than sending them to another faction's COT?

That would indeed be a cool feature.

There is no "at whim".. as you can only do it if that CoT is rich enough to support a split.. and you are not owning it..

so even if you own a 1300 worth Lissabon CoT, you can't create a new one out of it.. since you cant split your own.. but an enemy can and will..
 
Seelensturm said:
So the Kalmar Union will go on when using historical monarchs?

until the day it ended historically.
 
YodaMaster said:
That's why I asked if this last known monarch was "eternal" in EU3 as he would be in EU2 if no alternative. And I'm sure people under NDA know the answer. Question was for the Dev Team.

Well, if you are playing historically and want a proper historically accurate game, then yes, it is an eternal monarch, as the country should no longer exist. Everything else is just fantasy.