Europa Universalis IV – Developer Diary 1 – The world is at your feet

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.

Johan

Studio Manager Paradox Tinto
Administrator
Paradox Staff
Moderator
15 Badges
Dec 14, 1999
19.197
80.294
  • Diplomacy
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • War of the Roses
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Magicka
  • Starvoid
Welcome to the first installment in our development diary series for Europa Universalis IV (EU4)! Last week's little prologue doesn't really count ;)

If the world of Europa Universalis IV is your playground, then the map is the sandbox – this is where you shape your plans and turn various traits associated with the territories into mighty empires. If you are familiar with Paradox Development Studio (PDS) games, then you already know that the map is almost everything. The map is where the magic happens. You know it, we know it.

Crusader Kings II (CK2) was a large step forward in terms of visuals for us, but in Europa Universalis IV, we hope to take it one step further and add a few bells and whistles,
because we really want the world to come alive for you. This means making the map more intuitive, more attractive and something you won't mind staring at for hours on end. The feeling and atmosphere created by the map is important and will not make your eyes bleed. We promise.

To understand where we are going, it's important to understand where we've been. In Europa Universalis III (EU3), we built the map with quite low resolution. We increased the resolution in the Divine Wind expansion, which helped a lot with how the map looked but the provinces still felt a little weird – the borders didn't look as natural as we wanted them.

At this point, we haven't yet come to the phase where the borders will be tweaked, but our ultimate goal is to make borders feel smooth and adapted to the real life terrain and historical borders.

We occasionally get comments from our players that our province borders are ahistorical – that they do not accurately reflect the composition of nations or their historical shape.
So I want to clarify that when we make the designs of the provinces But in the long run, historical shapes for provinces are not really relevant.

“What?” I hear you say? “Did I hear that right?”

Yes, and there are good reasons for it.

A game map has to communicate a lot of information quickly, so first of all you need to be sure you can fit all the necessary graphical elements into the province.

Second, you need to have a rather convex shape of a province. If you don´t do this, you'll end up with all sorts of unintuitive thoughts when it comes to where units should move and how quickly.

Third, you need to bear in mind the number of connections a province has to neighboring territories. The number of neighbors is a crucial factor in military matters, and for game balance purposes.

So, if we valued history over balance or ease of play, an historical province of Warmia would be small, serpentine and surrounded by a concave province. This presents a lot of problems for a province-based game as we mentioned earlier.

The number of provinces you have on a map is limited by the number that one person can reasonably handle. Since provincial development and movement happens in real time, you need to make it relatively easy for players to locate and take action in a given province. We've learned what an optimal amount of provinces is, and in EU4, we aim to have a small increase of about ten percent cimpared to EU3. There will be significant changes, primarily in Eastern Europe, Japan & India, but also in other places on the map.

Here is a quick look of a small version of the underlying map defining which province is which, as it looks right now, before the major province overhaul.

attachment.php


Gameplay, of course, is only one reason to make a map. The play area should be pleasing to the eye so that it makes the world come alive and immerses you more deeply in the history. So in EU4, we have added back in the topology that we removed in the expansion Divine Wind and added trees to the map.
We also took the colored border system from Crusader Kings II (CK2) which makes playing on the terrain mapmode a more attractive option for many players.

As you may have noticed, we have changed map projection to the one we had in Victoria 2; a map that has been received positively by pretty much everyone in the community.
We are also making the map more of an interface tool for players, with cleared on-map interface windows, as you've seen in CK2.

We aim for a "believable world"-feeling on our maps. You will see the seasons changing. You will see when winter is coming and when it melts away to give room for a glorious summer. Mountains will rise and cast shadow over your provinces, you will see reflections in the water, ships with rippling sails and birds flying over the map.
The map will make information accessible and make it easier to get the big picture for when you build your empire.

But remember that eye-catching improvements are not just there to be pretty!
Many will show you very important things that affect how you play on the map. Your actions in Europa Universalis IV are affected by the season changes and the terrain and we want to make that visible for you.

Here is an example of the Nile Delta, with shadows, trees, and all other nice new things.
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • map.png
    map.png
    85,1 KB · Views: 109.083
  • pic_2.png
    pic_2.png
    1,1 MB · Views: 91.206
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Maps looks great, graphics wise. But I feel that the historical borders vs gameplay argument is a bit forced. Historicalish borders are perfectly possible if you refrain from implementing weird, distracting shapes and if you don't increase connections between provinces. I hope Paradox would accept communty input on minor map improvents such as names, captiols and maybe shapes if they don't change balance. And if not there's always modding. :)

Province sizes matter quite a lot though. Small border adjustments are usually fine.. but the proposals for Algarve we've seen are usually breaking a few rules.
 
Very nice, all of it!
 
The map is pretty, but is my computer going to be able to run it? I hope we can turn off those trees and shadows and things.

My guess is there will probably be options to turn shadows and water reflections on and off. Perhaps province and unit idle animations too.
 
Also, seems like there are tons of provinces in Japan, that looks promising.

Japan in the screenshot is the same as in Divine Wind as we haven't made any changs to Japan yet.
 
Would "sprites" be finally moddable (I mean meshes), or would EU4 still use EmotionFX?

We are switching away from EmotionFX for EUIV, to our own inhouse format. At the moment we cannot disclose any information about how much support(if any at all) we will offer for this new format. We'll get back to you on that :)
 
I hope we get to see large changes for the way cities look depending on their tradeing power and size, so large trading hubs will have lots of cranes, a harbour, dockyard, market area etc..

Currently, city size is directly connected to the tax value of that province.
 
And yes... In my opinion there's too much "We made this like in Victoria", "We made that like in CK2"... Stop copy/pasting yourself! Do something like in EUIV and not in any other game. Then i'll believe you that this is EUIV and not Europa Universalis 3.5

Yes, why learn from anything we've done in the past, we should just throw the baby out with the bathwater for the sake of it...
 
Istria has been changed after the screenshot was taken so lets put that topic to rest until you see a newwe version of the map. Then the complaints can resume again.