On The Laws Of The Vandals
On The Laws Of The Vandals
The Vandals, as should not surprise anyone, follow few laws as recognized by the civilized world. Indeed, many animal societies, such as a wake of vultures or colony of rats, seem to possess a far more civilized grasp of Law and its uses. In part, this is because, lacking a written record, it is difficult for anyone outside their bizarre priesthood and their “Law-Speakers” to know what exactly is legal and what is not.
Settling Legal Disputes
Traditionally, it seems, these cretins simply followed the “Blood Feud” method of dispute settlement, wherein the injured party attempts to kill anyone related to, friends with, or slaves of, the injurer. The injurer, now an injured party, follows up by attempting to kill anyone related to, friends with, or slaves of, the new injurer. This process is repeated until one side runs out of potential victims. This method is still widely popular today and is used to solve any offenses, such as rape, murder and theft but also to decide inheritance cases, property ownership, and possession of government offices.
The Chiefdom
Rulership, for those unlucky enough to have to exercise it over these vile beasts, is a hap-hazard affair. Besides the priests, whom I will dwell on later, the head-ruler over the Vandals is known as the “Chief.” The Chiefdom is not hereditary and any of the seven recognized Clans may claim the title. Occasionally, the title remains within a single clan for more than one generation, but this is rare. Since it is not hereditary, it would be easy to guess that personal power, fame, renown, justness or good bloodlines might be a qualification for high office, but that guess would be wrong.
The electors, such as they are, are not a set group of elders or a poll of all the citizens. It isn’t even the army, as such, who decide rulership over the tribe. No, that would all make sense, or at least be somewhat orderly, and that is not the Vandal Way. Instead, there is a flurry of activity wherein, at the moment of the old chief’s death, every claimant for the supreme authority promptly gathers every supporter they can and moves on the capitol. There is usually a burst of murder, pillage and other crimes as the rivals try to damage one another’s support bases and, of course, any “wrongs” done by the previous Chief must be addressed through the “Blood-Feud.” Often there are furious clashes of arms between the claimants and the priests utter their terrible curses in support of whichever maniac seems most likely to reward them.
In the end, the rivals die, back down, or pledge themselves to another and, eventually, only one man is left to claim the throne. Occasionally, if two rivals are too strong to crush one another, they will support an elderly or otherwise pathetic individual so as to put off their clash. Sometimes the rest of the tribe, in order to avoid the self-destruction of the tribe, will join to back a third candidate. Occasionally, this process does not degenerate into open Civil War, but that is probably the best thing that can be said about it.
Of course, being a popular commander or a wealthy and powerful individual, or the relative of a chief does not hurt ones chances, but it does not help as much as one might expect, for the citizens of this tribe pledge to a claimant based on how to best help their own prospects and not out of any sense of civic duty.
The new chief then settles any Blood-Feuds he might have, slaying rival clans in a frenzy of blood, and appointing his cronies to the few government offices the Vandals possess. He also appoints the most important officials of the realm: the General of the Armies, who has overall command of the Vandal Horde, a job that only the most foolish Vandal Chiefs entrust to others (although some Generals have appointed assistants, this is rare), and also the Thanes, who rule outlying villages and provinces in the Chief’s name. Attempts to make these powerful positions hereditary have largely failed for the same reason that the Chiefdom itself isn’t: these uncivilized brutes cannot abide anything that smacks of order or reason. That is, with the curious exception of the Law-Speakers.
The Law-Speakers
There are a class of men known as the Law-Speakers. They are not truly priests and have no special communion with the unseen world. What they are is a strange, idiotic, and therefore a wholly Vandal method of attempting “Civilization.”
It would seem that I am not the only Greek to survive his encounter with the Vandals. During the reign of Andica Marbodid, an absurdly common name, but I think he was the second of that name, Andica developed a love of Greece and Greek Culture, so he actually forbade the Vandals from murdering Greek Merchants and eating their brains. The shamans and priests had insisted this was a great method of learning Greek methods of ship-building. For a land-locked people, this bizarre love of the sea is almost perverse. Indeed, many of their songs and poems sing of the beauty of the sea and glorify life on the oceans, despite the fact that no Vandal, as far as I know, has ever even seen an actual boat, besides their crude and ineffective canoes, and the number who have seen the Ocean could be counted on one hand.
This Chief, having fallen in love with Greek Civilization, decided that the Vandals should have an orderly and organized code of laws just like the Greeks do, so he charged two minor families of Freemen to surrender their farms and spend their days with these captive Greeks, learning their law-codes, committing them to memory and, whenever a dispute arose, settling it immediately with their knowledge of these laws.
Eventually, this Andica died or was murdered, and these two families of Law-Speakers were having trouble remembering the entire code, so they took the advice of the priests and ate the brains of the Greeks in hopes the law-code would then pass into their heads. It did not work, of course, but rather than admit their fault, the Law-Speakers pretend to have a mastery of Greek-Law and fearlessly enter into any dispute with their partial knowledge imperfectly passed on to succeeding generations.
Law-Speakers in Action
An example of a Law-Speaker in action, shows quite readily the pointlessness of this revered institution. A slave, by name of Andica, wed a freewoman and by her had several children. It came to pass that Andica and the freewoman had a falling out, so she sold him to a citizen. The citizen then claimed the children because, as they were the children of his slave, they must be his property as well. He sent several armed supporters to claim the children, who were beaten off by the armed brothers of the free-woman. As the citizen led an attack on the freewoman’s farm, a Law-Speaker happened to be riding by. Boldly galloping between the two sides, he bade them halt so he could investigate the matter. The citizen pressed his claim for ownership of the children based on the father’s servitude while the freewoman claimed them because they came from her free womb.
The Law-Speaker, having heard both sides thought for a long time. Occasionally you could read his lips as he tried to remember a phrase. He said it to himself differently each time. Slowly he spoke, after what seemed to be hours. “I know that if a freeman has children with a slave, the children are slaves. I also know that if a freewoman and a slave have children and the freewoman dies, the children are considered the fathers, and therefore slaves…but if the woman lives.” His voice trailed off while he thought.
Then the vile creature sprung his horse into action, riding down and killing the freewoman. “This woman has died, thus the law makes these children their father’s and therefore slaves.”
Satisfied, he rode off.
I suspect Law-Speakers are considered outside the bounds of the Blood-Feud, for if they were not, they would be long since extinct.