Your words were not aimed solely at German.
You said that the "solution" was a "worker's revolution". You described the Third Republic as being "rotten to the core" and said that "it must be toppled for a new structure" to emerge. You stated that Mario Zepeda (then-President), Alejandro Cortez (senior Republicano) and Antonio de Santa Rosa (the founder of the Third Republic) "must all be destroyed". You dismissed elections as a means of achieving power and called upon the workers to "take what is rightfully theirs" and "institute a worker's state" - what you explicitly described as a "final conflict".
If this cannot be called violent rhetoric justifying a revolution and the overthrow of the Third Republic, then what can it be called?
- V. Severino
"I never once called for the workers to take up arms against the republic. How you choose to interpret my words is up to you, but I have explained myself beyond what is necessary."
-Ferran Marti, Alcalde de Santiago