Thinking of doing a Basque Cathar game, or a Zoroastrian game for conversion to EU4. Since this will be a significant investment of time, I'm looking for opinions, and hoping others have experience of if either of these is even fun in EU4.
Other suggestions are also welcome. I currently have a 1200s (no Mongols quite yet) game with a restored Roman Empire +Persia and Africa, but converted as Eastern Tech. Have yet to get the patience to play another 100-200 years so the conversion is Western Tech (started as Doux of Aegean Isles sp. in 867). Also had boring states without the Mongol chaos.
Going Piast dynasty is somewhat appealing, as is forming Russia or Hungary/Carpathia. However, none of those seems like it'd be as interesting in EU4 as other options especially as I've played Russia/Poland before, and Hungary has a terrible EU4 color and bleh ideas. Maybe struggling to form a Jewish state? Norse or Shia HRE?
Thanks for contributing in advance!
Other suggestions are also welcome. I currently have a 1200s (no Mongols quite yet) game with a restored Roman Empire +Persia and Africa, but converted as Eastern Tech. Have yet to get the patience to play another 100-200 years so the conversion is Western Tech (started as Doux of Aegean Isles sp. in 867). Also had boring states without the Mongol chaos.
Going Piast dynasty is somewhat appealing, as is forming Russia or Hungary/Carpathia. However, none of those seems like it'd be as interesting in EU4 as other options especially as I've played Russia/Poland before, and Hungary has a terrible EU4 color and bleh ideas. Maybe struggling to form a Jewish state? Norse or Shia HRE?
Thanks for contributing in advance!