Why is the AI still hilariously incompetent at marriage?
- Thread starter Agnitio Ex Mach
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
She's got no lovers. Neither does he. Anyways by the time I got to play as the king, he wasted the subjugation CB on Sami, let another AI re-take territories that were rebelling, and drained the nation's manpower. I suppose this isn't so much as stupid marriage AI but stupid AI in general.
I always get pissed when there are like 5 eligible princesses but my dynasty king members decide to marry clubfooted lowborns.
Love can fade as a lone hog in the morning's fog.
Some people may be into this stuff.
Is anyone complaining here that a ruler has a mistress? Marriages of the ruling class weren't primarily out of love, but for power; given the norms of the time, hence why male rulers often had a mistress and could get away with it.
I am not arguing the point that AI is stupid , but programming something with so many variables would probably be quite a task.
AI was never a strong part of Paradox games , what you can do in CK2 tough is role-play , make something up , to calm your mind.
"And thus my ridiculously stupid neighbor-king has thus tried to send a fool to come up to me, pull out a dagger when my guards already circled and encased him, and say "I'm supposed to murder you. King Rogvird sent me." So I just walked right up to King Rogvird and slapped him to death."
I wish the AI would use betrothals. Right now it is way too easy to get marriages.
Last edited: