Sorry for the lack of response but I was a little busy, however, in following days there should be at least 3 new chapters.

The hardest are Canaries, 0 mercs and weakest pagan religion and I doubt that I will ever change my mind.
Thanks and added.Nicely done!
I had another idea.Maybe you could start as one of the Manichaean counts under the PEchengs in 867 and conquer all of the Steppes and Persia?
If you didn't solved your problems already of course I can help.Man, I really need your help. Today I failed for the third time with the Jewish Duke of Khazars who starts in 1066. I always played Ironman, because with saving and reloading everything becomes boring. Can I send you a PM?
Thx.Cool concept! I'm impressed by what you've managed to pull off. I'll be following.![]()
As Battle Bunny stated, it would be probably too easy, considering that I can't convert to heresy at any moment I want.Hey, what would you think about a game where you would take a count in Irland in 867 and then playing as you want but you'll have to convert to the first catholic heresy that you'll find ?
Gonna look for it. Thanks.Too easy. A more worthwhile challenge is starting with a small heretic vassal to begin with - no time to build up before getting jumped by everyone. I can't think of any examples myself, but there may be some Cathar counts near the 1187-1204 bookmarks - and if not, you can always Ruler Design one.
Thanks for proposition but seems very similar to Roussel de Bailleul. A little blobing by holy wars - waiting for crusade - winning it - blobing by holy orders. But who knows, maybe I will repeat entire scheme (or it will be harder as him) so added.
Ck2 is mostly about "how long it will take to win", not like in eu "win is even possible?".Is there any character you don't think you could win with?
The hardest are Canaries, 0 mercs and weakest pagan religion and I doubt that I will ever change my mind.