Okay, since you apparently want to argue this lets break down the entire statement from the PI moderator.
edit 2: this is pretty much the most indepth explanation on why i think tywinzo took this as a negative, if you can't at least acknowledge that you can understand why he was upset even though you agree or disagree with his reaction then i honestly can think of nothing else to say.
Reported it to the programmers. ("it" is clearly referencing the stack trace which tywinzo provided. while i do not personally know what this is, i can make some guesses based off the content) I think we have a hum of what's the problem, so thanks for the report! (hey, we have a good idea what the issue is [note there is no references to reports from other users]. at this point this would be a good place to stop talking from a customer support perspective since ADDITIONAL BUG INFO FOR THIS BUG WASN'T NEEDED FROM TYWINZO) But just for future reports, try to be more thorough with the reproduction information provided. (this section is not relevant to the current conversation since it adds nothing, in future bug reports from tywinzo they can request additional information if he fails to provide WHAT THEY NEED since apparently the full set of reproduction details were not needed from him at this time [i'm assuming this since they did not request more specific info for this specific bug]. So i'll restate this, this section of the conversation was not necessary and in fact was inflammatory based on tywinzo's reaction. Stating that PI was right and tywinzo was wrong to feel dismissed is pretty silly).
edit:changed "stack info" to "stack trace"
