No idea. Though outside the forced inheritance (the part you by law is forced to pay your descendants) you can do pretty much whatever you want so could well be. But again I don't know.
That wiki page is completely bonkers. It claims that the average gross wage here is 3000 € a month which it most certainly isn't. It's 5200 € a month. I have literally no idea where they got their numbers from.
Also torn the amount I converted to 70k USD is low; though obviously it's in the high end and you could possibly argue that low wage ends at say 60k or 65k USD. It turns out though that the weakening of the Euro is more severe than I realised. The USD is now at 1 USD = 7 DKK according to google, which obviously means that my 70k USD figure isn't good anymore (hence why I prefer giving numbers in DKK or euro). What I called 70k USD would rather be around 50k USD with the current exchange rate.
And Torn back when the exchange rate I used was valid the average wage was nearly 100k USD. Nothing delusional there.
What do you mean? You think I'm trolling? I've talked about Danish wages before and said the same things; in fact you made a joke about it which won the POTM.
I was talking about mean, individual wages. Household income can be seen in the below English link which is in Denmark and is from the databases and hence the most correct numbers you can get. Note that a household/family is any address where at least 1 person over 15 (and eligible to pay tax) lives. Meaning that a flat with 1 person living there is a household; and so is a house with a couple and 4 children.
Yearly household income for couples is 737 580 DKK which is 98344 € and 105 369 USD with the current USD exchange rate. For singles it's 285 948 DKK which is 38126 € which with current exchange rate is 40850 USD.
http://dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/indkomster/familieindkomster
No idea what the median is.
Which adjustments? Are you talking about things like PPP? If so then I don't know. And I'm also questioning how correct it is to give that, since it doesn't change that how much money people actually are paid and while services and goods are more expensive in Denmark than in the US (generally), that doesn't mean that some store will say that my 100 bucks is less worth than your 100 bucks which is what should happen if you go fully through with PPP. Hence why I'm not sure how useful it is. Prices will just be higher in stores mainly catering to Danes than in stores mainly catering to say Americans. Though I'm no economist so I might be completely wrong here.
But as mentioned above the yearly average household income here is 105369 USD for couples (no matter whether they have children or not) and 40850 USD for singles (no matter whether they have children living with them or not). For households with three or more people over 15 and paying tax living there I don't know what it is, though the amount of such households will be negligible.
Firstly jeray is not right in what the average wage is (I'm minimising quotes so answering small ones together with bigger ones). The average wage is 39k a month which is 5200 €. What it is in USD will fluctuate with time, hence why giving the number in € is much better since the DKK is pegged to the Euro (despite being far stronger than the euro; the peg's for obvious economic reasons though from time to time speculants are trying to break it since they'd make a fortune from it, since should the peg break the value of the DKK would skyrocket).
Anyway with the current USD rate it's around 5600 USD a month. Though do note that the 39k number is from a report to parliament back in 2013 and hence the 39k is the 2012 numbers. The average wage will have risen since then, but the 39k should still be good enough as long as we aren't needing precise calculations.
Again no idea what the median is for the monthly wage, for for the hourly rate it's 218 DKK (29 € 31 USD), whereas the mean is 243 DKK (32 € 35 USD). Though note that pretty much everybody have fixed wages (and hence fixed hours) and hence talking hourly rate instead of monthly wage is pretty strange. Though for some reason they didn't give the median monthly wage in the abstract, but only the mean. No idea why.
And Torn's number is rubbish with regard to this discussion---I assume you mean the 308 144 DKK (41085 € 44020 USD) he quoted. Here you have the detailed numbers in English and if you look at the description you'll notice that it covers every single person in Denmark who is over 15 years of age and who's liable to pay tax (and everybody with permanent residence here has to pay tax). So his number is not the average wage, but the average personal income. People on the various security nets are counted too. So are retired people, students, disabled people who can't hold a job, etc. Nothing wrong with the numbers per se (and they can be quite interesting and useful), but they're not what we're discussing. The average wage obviously will be higher since the average won't be dragged down by people who aren't working and hence obviously making less, since benefits (generally) are lower than wages.
http://dst.dk/en/Statistik/emner/indkomster/personindkomster
Read the link you posted again. Those 44k USD are the average income of the total population above 15. That is not the same as the average salary; that's quite below the average salary in fact. And the rate I used to get the 70k USD turned out to be really outdated due to the recent fall in euro USD rates. If I give it in € instead then the 30k to 70k obsoletely converted USD would be around 25k to around 50k €.
Google translate translation seems right (can't guarantee that there isn't some terms which are wrongly translated, but in layman terms it's right). And as mentioned the exchange rate I used was horribly obsolete. Perhaps I should just always give numbers in €, but then non Europeans complain---on the other hand giving them in € means I never run into problems like this where the numbers I give used to be correct, but not aren't due to the exchange rate significantly changing. Back when I did the numbers the 39k a month equaled around 96k USD a year.
As mentioned Torn's numbers are the average income for the entire population over 15 years of age and hence much lower than the average wage since people with jobs earn more than people on benefits. There's no technicalities at all there. Torn just aren't talking about the same population group as the rest of us. He's talking about the entire population over 15 whereas we're just talking about employees. And all numbers I reported indeed are true numbers and I can point you to the source of every single one of them. But yes the currency conversion turned out to be horribly out of date.
And there's absolutely no omissions in the numbers I gave. The all the numbers are from Statistics Denmark which is the government agency who has to compile statistics for the government/administration and the public. And they're fully independent and have always been so since they were formed around 1850. Politicians don't mess/obfuscate/omit anything from the data they use. They have direct, unlimited access to the databases. And most of all that data from the databases they then make publicly available. Some of it is summed up on their main site, but if you really want hard data then you can go to their statistics bank site where you have all publicly database information at your disposal and can draw out data in any combination you'd like.
Here you have the statistics bank.
http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/SelectTable/Omrade0.asp?SubjectCode=&PLanguage=1
For instance on October 1st 2016 there were 551 New Zealand citizens living in Denmark; the amount of people from NZ on October 1st 2016 was 674 meaning that 123 people from NZ doesn't have NZ citizenship (presumably due to having a Danish one). You can also all kinds of graphs/charts for how their number has changed just like you can get things like age, gender, where they live, etc. You can then also have where they live shown on a nice map. (October 1st 2016 is the most recent they have publicly released data for; the data bases of course have real time data, but unless you're in the central administration you won't be able to see that real time data, but only get data dumps with regular time intervals and the public also don't get access to all data for obvious reasons. For instance if I have a specific address in Denmark I can trivially find out every single loan/mortgage on it, when it was built, when extensions where build, who the owners are, and everything else which is listed for that property. (Some American did a data scrape (authorities called it hacking) of that land registrations data base and put the data on his website a few months back; led to quite a fuss and the Americans (upon request) looking into shutting him down, though he went off the grid before they caught him.))
To prove most of the combined databases are publicly available then anybody try and ask me something and I'll answer as long as the data is publicly available. (Though don't ask about things from the land registration database; I'm not comfortable posting that online.)
Here you for instance have the amount of kiwis (as in people from NZ) in Denmark over time with each tick on the graph covering a year. Vertical axis is the amount; horizontal the year. And since I randomly saw it was a possibility and fought it fun then I also included the number of people from East Germany; it's the graph titled DDR---there were two of those until 2008 when they both had died/left the country/stopped counting as East Germans (I have no idea why they weren't just counted as Germans which the rest apparently was as evidenced by that drop after 1991).
Remember that Danes don't have to worry about things like paying for education, health care, etc. since it's free. Education including everything in university (including a student wage for studying) is completely free; and so is health care. It's all funded through the taxes which is why they are so high. So you need to take that into consideration when you compare the amount of money Danes and Americans have to spend, because while Americans will have a higher one in PPP they also have to set money aside for university, health care, etc.
You think that having a sex room is spectacular? Again it's pretty much just a bed. And the reason it's there is that in daytime the cells aren't closed so if you want some privacy during sex you need to go to a specific room. So I don't see how having the sex room making it grand compared to outside living accommodations. And the gaming room is comparable to a living room. Except the TV isn't that big, the board games are old, and it's probably something like a ps2 which is available (might be ps3 these days; don't know). That's not something I'd call spectacular in any way; anybody with a living room can easily do better.
Also the furnitures in that cell aren't stellar at all; in fact the chair close to the cell door is a type used in schools around the 70s and unless it's a design classic (which I doubt) it isn't really worth anything.