Took me the better part of an hour to come up with this formula, the least ya'll could do is acknowledge it.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Took me the better part of an hour to come up with this formula, the least ya'll could do is acknowledge it.
Wow Rov, I'm hurt that you think that i'd do something so egregious as searching the question on google.
No point in denying it: we're all enamored with Cliges.I don't know. The prize was my admiration, but Cliges is so cool that he already has that.
Or is it two words?"four-syllable" is also a four-syllable word
Nature has a slight preference for females so outside of things like drowning your girls (or getting them aborted these days) as happens in certain parts of the world there will be more females than males.
What third world country is the US?
Any country which doesn't collect data in a way which made the KGB envious are not proper countries.
(You get one guess as to which country has such surveilence/data collection systems.)
Hence why I said at least in the west.
And the GDP example is a poor camparison, since GDP isn't determined by biology. Gender is decided by biology just like skin colour. How can you say that black people are a minority, but men aren't? Because how are blacks different from whites if not from their biological differences?
(Also I am not saying men should have minority protection; just that you can't say men aren't a minority.)
Minority =/= oppressed group
Also, the political parties in America really aren't that clearly defined. It's hard to say exactly where the line between Republican, moderate, and Liberal lies in contemporary US politics, and many people don't necessarily agree entirely with either party. (Also, I believe that currently more people identify as Independent than either of the two big parties.)
It's stupid because it would divide all pre-existing minority groups in half for little reason. Also, because it's so close to half of the population in virtually every society that it doesn't actually matter.Nature has a slight preference for females so outside of things like drowning your girls (or getting them aborted these days) as happens in certain parts of the world there will be more females than males.
What third world country is the US?
Any country which doesn't collect data in a way which made the KGB envious are not proper countries.
(You get one guess as to which country has such surveilence/data collection systems.)
Hence why I said at least in the west.
And the GDP example is a poor camparison, since GDP isn't determined by biology. Gender is decided by biology just like skin colour. How can you say that black people are a minority, but men aren't? Because how are blacks different from whites if not from their biological differences?
(Also I am not saying men should have minority protection; just that you can't say men aren't a minority.)
Absolute nonsense here. Political parties are clearly defined. There is no "moderate" party and there is no "Liberal" party. You're conflating political sensibilities and ideologies with parties.
Certainly I don't think political party identification means much. But your rebuttal here is garbage.
Wow. That has to be the worst formula I've ever seen.
I expected a few more & more positive reactions, to be honest.
I don't know if people used to agree antirely with the American parties though that seems strange, but at least here in Europe nobody agrees entirely with any party.
Still a minority; a minority being big doesn't make it less of a minority. And why would it halve all other minorities? People can be members of several groups. So a black man would both be a member of the male minority and the black minority.
Natural sex ratio at birth for human beings is actually around 105 males born to every 100 females born. In certain places in the world (i.e., large sectors of China/India), the ratio is higher due to artificial factors, which you have alluded to. Males have this bad habit of dying more early (partially through more idiocy/risk-taking behavior, partially for biological reasons)
http://www.searo.who.int/entity/health_situation_trends/data/chi/sex-ratio/en/
Look, there is no moderate party. But to say that the two dominant political parties in America are clearly defined is also garbage. You don't have to register to belong to either of them, they don't have a defined set of policies that all members agree on. You an belong to the democratic party and disagree on a number of policies withanother member of the democratic party.
Simply not true. The two political parties are clearly defined, and if one belongs to the Democratic party, but doesn't agree with them on all issues, one is still a part of the Democratic party. That the political parties aren't perfect hiveminds does not mean they are not clearly defined.
The impression I get is that they aren't well defined. I primarily get this impression because they cover so much of the political spectrum (there being only two really viable parties meaning many more people with a wider range of viewpoints claim either of those two parties). Maybe I'm wrong, but that's the impression I get. For instance, HIllary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are both potential Democratic Party nominees for President, but they're a ways apart on the political spectrum.
You clearly aren't even reading anything I type, so I'm not continuing this.