-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You guys with your fancy rights and amendments and other fairy tales of all couleur. The only thing you need is the non-aggression principle.
I wouldn't trust a German with anything having to do with "non-aggression."
You just say "transgender rights". And that's all.
I really want a non-Christian president. They don't even have to be an atheist. Just a non-Christian.
And when you call someone a fruitcake, you call them a relic of tradition everyone pretends to like, which actually tastes like a small rat died and was chopped up into small glutinous mystery chunks.
I see my policy of never discussing politics on online forums is as wise as ever.
It's fair to say that even Livingstone is probably more Catholic than the pope these days. So O'Malley surely qualifies, too.
I wouldn't trust a German with anything having to do with "non-aggression."
Accept my non-aggressiveness, or get blitzkrieged.
You just say "transgender rights". And that's all.
I really want a non-Christian president. They don't even have to be an atheist. Just a non-Christian.
Atheism is the same shit as religion, pretending to know things that can't be known. We actually need less of that kind of people.
If gender can be a verb (and it is, because they taught me so at university), why not transgender?
I had to cope with a lot of "gendered" texts; there is no good reason why they can't be transgendered just as well.
At the risk of exhibiting excessive amounts of mc clan arrogance, I've forgotten more about politics than most people know - worked as a journo for a couple years, am still doing freelance research work in the field. Which is why pretty much any online political discussion induces massive amounts of #headdesk and a deep hatred for comments sections.