• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

keynes2.0

Field Marshal
45 Badges
Jun 27, 2010
7.861
4.281
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Rome Gold
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • March of the Eagles
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Hearts of Iron Anthology
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Darkest Hour
  • East India Company
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall
  • BATTLETECH: Season pass
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • BATTLETECH: Flashpoint
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Age of Wonders II
  • Age of Wonders
  • BATTLETECH: Heavy Metal
  • Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Surviving Mars
  • BATTLETECH
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Pride of Nations
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria 2
  • Cities: Skylines
I dont know anything about astrophysics. I'm just talking about straightforward information like apparent magnitude of stars or the mass of various objects in the solar system.
 

yonderTheGreat

Colonel
114 Badges
Dec 12, 2002
1.144
578
www.planetdungeonsiege.com
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Magicka
  • Majesty 2 Collection
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • War of the Roses
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Magicka: Wizard Wars Founder Wizard
  • Pride of Nations
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Diplomacy
  • Dungeonland
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • For The Glory
  • For the Motherland
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
Not sure what you're saying. Wikipedia was quoting official Russian sources - the doubt arises not from Wikipedia, but the Russian sources. Same for the German sources. I hate it when people knock Wikipedia - it's open to abuse, sure, but I think its excellent.

My objection was poorly phrased.

If you find a good source via Wikipedia... cite the source directly. Don't say cite only Wikipedia as the source.

I don't mean to sound like I'm knocking Wikipedia. It's a SUPERB *initial* starting point. But the person I was referring to openly criticized the lack of reputable sources earlier in the thread (perfectly legit point) and then directly cited WP. Why not directly cite the original Russian Sources. That would have been much more consistent by my reckoning. That's literally all I was saying.
 

stevieji

Squadron Leader
28 Badges
Dec 17, 2013
647
10.956
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
But the person I was referring to openly criticized the lack of reputable sources earlier in the thread (perfectly legit point) and then directly cited WP. Why not directly cite the original Russian Sources. That would have been much more consistent by my reckoning.
That person was me - the same person - and the same person who already gave as full an assessment as it's possible for me to make in that other thread. Rather than spend time repeating myself, I simply directed you to the source of my information.
Another person in this thread referenced exactly the same data and seems to have escaped this kind of criticism - and indeed seems to have received a degree of approbation. o_O

If you find a good source via Wikipedia... cite the source directly. Don't say cite only Wikipedia as the source.
I have no access to 'the original Russian Sources' - I have access to Wikipedia. In any case, this is not a PhD thesis, it's a thread in a games company's forums - I literally don't need to cite anything. If I want to I can even make ill-informed guesses - or simply make stuff up. That seems to be what a lot of people do. :p
I certainly don't see any reason why I should necessarily have to go looking beyond Wikipedia for information. It's rigorously peer-reviewed and certainly comprehensive enough for this kind of forum.
Now, is there anything else I can help you with?
 
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions: